原发性THA术后90天内再入院与1年患者报告的预后指标改善降低和再手术率增加相关。

IF 4.4 2区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® Pub Date : 2025-02-27 DOI:10.1097/CORR.0000000000003429
Shujaa T Khan, Ignacio Pasqualini, Yuxuan Jin, Alison K Klika, Nicolas S Piuzzi
{"title":"原发性THA术后90天内再入院与1年患者报告的预后指标改善降低和再手术率增加相关。","authors":"Shujaa T Khan, Ignacio Pasqualini, Yuxuan Jin, Alison K Klika, Nicolas S Piuzzi","doi":"10.1097/CORR.0000000000003429","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Readmissions after THA can negatively impact patients, increase healthcare utilization, and subsequently increase costs. However, there is little to demonstrate whether readmission after THA is associated with poorer results in outcomes that matter to patients, such as pain relief, restoration of function, or activities of daily living. Moreover, the impact of medical-related readmissions compared with orthopaedic-related readmissions on postoperative outcomes is currently unknown.</p><p><strong>Questions/purpose: </strong>Are patients readmitted within 90 days of an index THA less likely to achieve a minimum clinically important difference (MCID) or patient acceptable symptom state (PASS) threshold in postoperative patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) compared with those who are not readmitted? (2) Is the cause of readmission within 90 days (medical or orthopaedic) associated with a lower likelihood of achieving either MCID or PASS thresholds 1 year after THA? (3) How does 90-day readmission compare with other patient-specific factors associated with a lower likelihood of attaining either MCID or PASS? (4) Are patients readmitted within 90 days more likely to undergo further surgery?</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between January 2016 and December 2020, we treated 11,026 patients with primary THA at a large tertiary academic center. Patients undergoing nonelective (n = 551) and bilateral THAs (n = 1582) were excluded, leaving 8893 for final analysis here. Of these, 2476 patients were lost to follow-up and thus not included in the 1-year PROMs analysis, but they remained included in the study overall. Data for each patient were extracted from a validated longitudinally maintained institutional database. The mean ± SD age of patients was 65 ± 11.5 years, 57% were women, and 86% self-reported as White. Readmissions were individually reviewed and grouped into medical-related or orthopaedic-related causes based on the primary cause. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to investigate the association of 90-day readmission with 1-year PROMs. Overall, 6% (502 of 8893) were readmitted within 90 days, with 75% (377 of 502) being medically related and 25% (125 of 502) being orthopaedically related readmissions. PROM scores were obtained preoperatively and at 1 year after each of the THAs and included Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS) pain, physical function, and joint replacement scores, as well as the Veterans Rand 12-Item Health Survey mental component summary score. Each was scored from 0 to 100, with higher scores representing better patient-perceived outcomes. Anchor-based MCID (HOOS pain 33, HOOS physical function 34, and HOOS joint replacement 18) and PASS thresholds (HOOS pain 80.6, HOOS physical function 83.6, and HOOS joint replacement 76.8) were utilized.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients readmitted within 90 days of an index THA were less likely to achieve the MCID in HOOS joint replacement (OR 1.5 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.1 to 2.06]; p = 0.01). Similarly, compared with patients who were not readmitted, readmitted patients were less likely to achieve PASS thresholds in HOOS pain (OR 1.37 [95% CI 1.07 to 1.77]; p = 0.01) and HOOS joint replacement (OR 1.4 [95% CI 1.05 to 1.92]; p = 0.02). Patients readmitted for orthopaedic causes compared with those not readmitted were less likely to achieve the MCID in HOOS joint replacement (OR 2.59 [95% CI 1.56 to 4.31]; p < 0.001) and the PASS threshold in HOOS pain (OR 1.79 [95% 1.12 to 2.86]; p = 0.02) and HOOS joint replacement (1.76 [95% CI 1.06 to 2.93]; p = 0.03) at 1 year. However, patients readmitted for medical causes, compared with patients who were not readmitted, were not less likely to achieve MCID or PASS thresholds in any of the HOOS subscales. The 90-day readmission (Akaike information criterion [AIC] increase 14.1) was the sixth most important variable influencing the likelihood of not achieving the MCID in HOOS joint replacement, following PROM phenotype (AIC 265), opioid use (Narx score), smoking, insurance, and race. Similarly, 90-day readmission ranked as the seventh and sixth most important variable for not achieving PASS thresholds in HOOS pain (AIC increase 7.5) and HOOS joint replacement (AIC increase 8.3), respectively. Patients readmitted within 90 days were more likely to undergo further surgery compared with those who were not readmitted (20.3% versus 0.04%; p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although medical-related readmissions are more frequent after THA, patients readmitted for orthopaedic causes are less likely to perceive meaningful improvements in pain relief and hip function at 1 year. Surgeons can reassure patients readmitted for medical reasons that their long-term symptom relief and functional recovery remain achievable. These findings highlight the importance of specifically identifying patients at higher risk of orthopaedic-related readmissions and implementing personalized preoperative optimization strategies tailored to their specific risk factors to reduce the chance of complications that may lead to readmission. Future studies should focus on identifying optimal management strategies for readmitted patients to ensure that they continue to perceive substantial benefits in their hip symptoms and function after surgery.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level III, therapeutic study.</p>","PeriodicalId":10404,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®","volume":" ","pages":"1438-1452"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12266905/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Readmission Within 90 Days After Primary THA Is Associated With Decreased Improvement in 1-Year Patient-reported Outcome Measures and Increased Reoperation Rates.\",\"authors\":\"Shujaa T Khan, Ignacio Pasqualini, Yuxuan Jin, Alison K Klika, Nicolas S Piuzzi\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/CORR.0000000000003429\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Readmissions after THA can negatively impact patients, increase healthcare utilization, and subsequently increase costs. However, there is little to demonstrate whether readmission after THA is associated with poorer results in outcomes that matter to patients, such as pain relief, restoration of function, or activities of daily living. Moreover, the impact of medical-related readmissions compared with orthopaedic-related readmissions on postoperative outcomes is currently unknown.</p><p><strong>Questions/purpose: </strong>Are patients readmitted within 90 days of an index THA less likely to achieve a minimum clinically important difference (MCID) or patient acceptable symptom state (PASS) threshold in postoperative patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) compared with those who are not readmitted? (2) Is the cause of readmission within 90 days (medical or orthopaedic) associated with a lower likelihood of achieving either MCID or PASS thresholds 1 year after THA? (3) How does 90-day readmission compare with other patient-specific factors associated with a lower likelihood of attaining either MCID or PASS? (4) Are patients readmitted within 90 days more likely to undergo further surgery?</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between January 2016 and December 2020, we treated 11,026 patients with primary THA at a large tertiary academic center. Patients undergoing nonelective (n = 551) and bilateral THAs (n = 1582) were excluded, leaving 8893 for final analysis here. Of these, 2476 patients were lost to follow-up and thus not included in the 1-year PROMs analysis, but they remained included in the study overall. Data for each patient were extracted from a validated longitudinally maintained institutional database. The mean ± SD age of patients was 65 ± 11.5 years, 57% were women, and 86% self-reported as White. Readmissions were individually reviewed and grouped into medical-related or orthopaedic-related causes based on the primary cause. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to investigate the association of 90-day readmission with 1-year PROMs. Overall, 6% (502 of 8893) were readmitted within 90 days, with 75% (377 of 502) being medically related and 25% (125 of 502) being orthopaedically related readmissions. PROM scores were obtained preoperatively and at 1 year after each of the THAs and included Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS) pain, physical function, and joint replacement scores, as well as the Veterans Rand 12-Item Health Survey mental component summary score. Each was scored from 0 to 100, with higher scores representing better patient-perceived outcomes. Anchor-based MCID (HOOS pain 33, HOOS physical function 34, and HOOS joint replacement 18) and PASS thresholds (HOOS pain 80.6, HOOS physical function 83.6, and HOOS joint replacement 76.8) were utilized.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients readmitted within 90 days of an index THA were less likely to achieve the MCID in HOOS joint replacement (OR 1.5 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.1 to 2.06]; p = 0.01). Similarly, compared with patients who were not readmitted, readmitted patients were less likely to achieve PASS thresholds in HOOS pain (OR 1.37 [95% CI 1.07 to 1.77]; p = 0.01) and HOOS joint replacement (OR 1.4 [95% CI 1.05 to 1.92]; p = 0.02). Patients readmitted for orthopaedic causes compared with those not readmitted were less likely to achieve the MCID in HOOS joint replacement (OR 2.59 [95% CI 1.56 to 4.31]; p < 0.001) and the PASS threshold in HOOS pain (OR 1.79 [95% 1.12 to 2.86]; p = 0.02) and HOOS joint replacement (1.76 [95% CI 1.06 to 2.93]; p = 0.03) at 1 year. However, patients readmitted for medical causes, compared with patients who were not readmitted, were not less likely to achieve MCID or PASS thresholds in any of the HOOS subscales. The 90-day readmission (Akaike information criterion [AIC] increase 14.1) was the sixth most important variable influencing the likelihood of not achieving the MCID in HOOS joint replacement, following PROM phenotype (AIC 265), opioid use (Narx score), smoking, insurance, and race. Similarly, 90-day readmission ranked as the seventh and sixth most important variable for not achieving PASS thresholds in HOOS pain (AIC increase 7.5) and HOOS joint replacement (AIC increase 8.3), respectively. Patients readmitted within 90 days were more likely to undergo further surgery compared with those who were not readmitted (20.3% versus 0.04%; p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although medical-related readmissions are more frequent after THA, patients readmitted for orthopaedic causes are less likely to perceive meaningful improvements in pain relief and hip function at 1 year. Surgeons can reassure patients readmitted for medical reasons that their long-term symptom relief and functional recovery remain achievable. These findings highlight the importance of specifically identifying patients at higher risk of orthopaedic-related readmissions and implementing personalized preoperative optimization strategies tailored to their specific risk factors to reduce the chance of complications that may lead to readmission. Future studies should focus on identifying optimal management strategies for readmitted patients to ensure that they continue to perceive substantial benefits in their hip symptoms and function after surgery.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level III, therapeutic study.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10404,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1438-1452\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12266905/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/CORR.0000000000003429\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CORR.0000000000003429","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:人工髋关节置换术后再入院会对患者产生负面影响,增加医疗保健利用率,并随后增加费用。然而,很少有证据表明THA后再入院是否与患者预后较差有关,如疼痛缓解、功能恢复或日常生活活动。此外,与骨科相关的再入院相比,医学相关的再入院对术后结果的影响目前尚不清楚。问题/目的:与未再次入院的患者相比,在术后患者报告的结果测量(PROMs)中,在指标THA后90天内再次入院的患者是否更不可能达到最小临床重要差异(MCID)或患者可接受症状状态(PASS)阈值?(2) 90天内再入院的原因(内科或骨科)是否与THA术后1年达到MCID或PASS阈值的可能性较低有关?(3)与其他患者特异性因素相比,90天再入院与获得MCID或PASS的可能性较低有何关系?(4) 90天内再次入院的患者是否更有可能接受进一步手术?方法:2016年1月至2020年12月,我们在一家大型三级学术中心治疗了11026例原发性THA患者。排除非选择性tha患者(n = 551)和双侧tha患者(n = 1582),留下8893例作为最终分析。其中,2476例患者没有随访,因此没有纳入1年的PROMs分析,但他们仍被纳入整体研究。每个患者的数据都是从一个经过验证的纵向维护的机构数据库中提取的。患者的平均±SD年龄为65±11.5岁,57%为女性,86%自述为白人。对再入院进行单独审查,并根据主要原因分为医学相关或骨科相关原因。采用多变量logistic回归模型调查90天再入院与1年prom的关系。总体而言,6%(8893例中有502例)在90天内再次入院,其中75%(502例中有377例)与医学相关,25%(502例中有125例)与骨科相关。在术前和每次tha后1年获得PROM评分,包括髋关节残疾和骨关节炎结局评分(HOOS)疼痛,身体功能和关节置换术评分,以及退伍军人兰德12项健康调查心理成分总结评分。每一项的评分从0到100,分数越高代表患者感知到的结果越好。采用基于锚定的MCID (HOOS疼痛33分,HOOS身体功能34分,HOOS关节置换术18分)和PASS阈值(HOOS疼痛80.6分,HOOS身体功能83.6分,HOOS关节置换术76.8分)。结果:指数THA后90天内再次入院的患者在HOOS关节置换术中达到MCID的可能性较低(OR为1.5[95%可信区间(CI) 1.1至2.06];P = 0.01)。同样,与未再次入院的患者相比,再次入院的患者在HOOS疼痛中达到PASS阈值的可能性更小(OR 1.37 [95% CI 1.07至1.77];p = 0.01)和HOOS关节置换术(OR 1.4 [95% CI 1.05 ~ 1.92];P = 0.02)。因骨科原因再次入院的患者与未再次入院的患者相比,在HOOS关节置换术中达到MCID的可能性更低(OR 2.59 [95% CI 1.56至4.31];p < 0.001)和HOOS疼痛的PASS阈值(OR 1.79 [95% 1.12 ~ 2.86];p = 0.02)和HOOS关节置换术(1.76 [95% CI 1.06 ~ 2.93];P = 0.03)。然而,与未再次入院的患者相比,因医疗原因再次入院的患者在任何HOOS亚量表中达到MCID或PASS阈值的可能性并不低。90天再入院(Akaike信息标准[AIC]增加14.1)是影响HOOS关节置换术中未达到MCID可能性的第6个最重要变量,其次是PROM表型(AIC 265)、阿片类药物使用(Narx评分)、吸烟、保险和种族。同样,90天再入院分别是HOOS疼痛(AIC增加7.5)和HOOS关节置换手术(AIC增加8.3)未达到PASS阈值的第七和第六大重要变量。与未再次入院的患者相比,90天内再次入院的患者更有可能接受进一步手术(20.3%对0.04%;P < 0.001)。结论:尽管THA术后医学相关的再入院更为频繁,但因骨科原因再入院的患者在1年后不太可能感受到疼痛缓解和髋关节功能有意义的改善。外科医生可以向因医学原因再次入院的患者保证,他们的长期症状缓解和功能恢复仍然是可以实现的。 这些发现强调了明确识别骨科相关再入院风险较高的患者的重要性,并针对其特定的风险因素实施个性化的术前优化策略,以减少可能导致再入院的并发症的机会。未来的研究应侧重于确定再入院患者的最佳管理策略,以确保他们在手术后继续感受到髋部症状和功能的实质性改善。证据等级:III级,治疗性研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Readmission Within 90 Days After Primary THA Is Associated With Decreased Improvement in 1-Year Patient-reported Outcome Measures and Increased Reoperation Rates.

Background: Readmissions after THA can negatively impact patients, increase healthcare utilization, and subsequently increase costs. However, there is little to demonstrate whether readmission after THA is associated with poorer results in outcomes that matter to patients, such as pain relief, restoration of function, or activities of daily living. Moreover, the impact of medical-related readmissions compared with orthopaedic-related readmissions on postoperative outcomes is currently unknown.

Questions/purpose: Are patients readmitted within 90 days of an index THA less likely to achieve a minimum clinically important difference (MCID) or patient acceptable symptom state (PASS) threshold in postoperative patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) compared with those who are not readmitted? (2) Is the cause of readmission within 90 days (medical or orthopaedic) associated with a lower likelihood of achieving either MCID or PASS thresholds 1 year after THA? (3) How does 90-day readmission compare with other patient-specific factors associated with a lower likelihood of attaining either MCID or PASS? (4) Are patients readmitted within 90 days more likely to undergo further surgery?

Methods: Between January 2016 and December 2020, we treated 11,026 patients with primary THA at a large tertiary academic center. Patients undergoing nonelective (n = 551) and bilateral THAs (n = 1582) were excluded, leaving 8893 for final analysis here. Of these, 2476 patients were lost to follow-up and thus not included in the 1-year PROMs analysis, but they remained included in the study overall. Data for each patient were extracted from a validated longitudinally maintained institutional database. The mean ± SD age of patients was 65 ± 11.5 years, 57% were women, and 86% self-reported as White. Readmissions were individually reviewed and grouped into medical-related or orthopaedic-related causes based on the primary cause. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to investigate the association of 90-day readmission with 1-year PROMs. Overall, 6% (502 of 8893) were readmitted within 90 days, with 75% (377 of 502) being medically related and 25% (125 of 502) being orthopaedically related readmissions. PROM scores were obtained preoperatively and at 1 year after each of the THAs and included Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS) pain, physical function, and joint replacement scores, as well as the Veterans Rand 12-Item Health Survey mental component summary score. Each was scored from 0 to 100, with higher scores representing better patient-perceived outcomes. Anchor-based MCID (HOOS pain 33, HOOS physical function 34, and HOOS joint replacement 18) and PASS thresholds (HOOS pain 80.6, HOOS physical function 83.6, and HOOS joint replacement 76.8) were utilized.

Results: Patients readmitted within 90 days of an index THA were less likely to achieve the MCID in HOOS joint replacement (OR 1.5 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.1 to 2.06]; p = 0.01). Similarly, compared with patients who were not readmitted, readmitted patients were less likely to achieve PASS thresholds in HOOS pain (OR 1.37 [95% CI 1.07 to 1.77]; p = 0.01) and HOOS joint replacement (OR 1.4 [95% CI 1.05 to 1.92]; p = 0.02). Patients readmitted for orthopaedic causes compared with those not readmitted were less likely to achieve the MCID in HOOS joint replacement (OR 2.59 [95% CI 1.56 to 4.31]; p < 0.001) and the PASS threshold in HOOS pain (OR 1.79 [95% 1.12 to 2.86]; p = 0.02) and HOOS joint replacement (1.76 [95% CI 1.06 to 2.93]; p = 0.03) at 1 year. However, patients readmitted for medical causes, compared with patients who were not readmitted, were not less likely to achieve MCID or PASS thresholds in any of the HOOS subscales. The 90-day readmission (Akaike information criterion [AIC] increase 14.1) was the sixth most important variable influencing the likelihood of not achieving the MCID in HOOS joint replacement, following PROM phenotype (AIC 265), opioid use (Narx score), smoking, insurance, and race. Similarly, 90-day readmission ranked as the seventh and sixth most important variable for not achieving PASS thresholds in HOOS pain (AIC increase 7.5) and HOOS joint replacement (AIC increase 8.3), respectively. Patients readmitted within 90 days were more likely to undergo further surgery compared with those who were not readmitted (20.3% versus 0.04%; p < 0.001).

Conclusion: Although medical-related readmissions are more frequent after THA, patients readmitted for orthopaedic causes are less likely to perceive meaningful improvements in pain relief and hip function at 1 year. Surgeons can reassure patients readmitted for medical reasons that their long-term symptom relief and functional recovery remain achievable. These findings highlight the importance of specifically identifying patients at higher risk of orthopaedic-related readmissions and implementing personalized preoperative optimization strategies tailored to their specific risk factors to reduce the chance of complications that may lead to readmission. Future studies should focus on identifying optimal management strategies for readmitted patients to ensure that they continue to perceive substantial benefits in their hip symptoms and function after surgery.

Level of evidence: Level III, therapeutic study.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
11.90%
发文量
722
审稿时长
2.5 months
期刊介绍: Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® is a leading peer-reviewed journal devoted to the dissemination of new and important orthopaedic knowledge. CORR® brings readers the latest clinical and basic research, along with columns, commentaries, and interviews with authors.
期刊最新文献
Beyond the Bone: Value Over Volume-Redefining Success in Orthopaedic Care. Art in Science: Perspectives Through Fire and Sand. Classifications in Brief: The AO Spine Upper Cervical Injury Classification System. What Predicts a Subsequent Skeletal-related Event, and How Do Factors Associated With Mortality Differ After an Initial Versus a Subsequent Event? More Frequent Electrical Stimulation Impairs Nerve Regeneration After Median Nerve Repair in a Rat Model.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1