弱势群体公共服务中的数字包容:公共服务生态系统理论视角下的研究主题与目标-行动框架系统回顾

IF 10 1区 管理学 Q1 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Government Information Quarterly Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-06 DOI:10.1016/j.giq.2025.102019
Hui Liu, Qingshan Zhou, Shuang Liang
{"title":"弱势群体公共服务中的数字包容:公共服务生态系统理论视角下的研究主题与目标-行动框架系统回顾","authors":"Hui Liu,&nbsp;Qingshan Zhou,&nbsp;Shuang Liang","doi":"10.1016/j.giq.2025.102019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Ensuring access to digital public services for vulnerable groups is a critical issue in digital government and digital inclusion research. Mapping the research trajectory in this domain is essential for fostering a systematic understanding among scholars and policymakers. Guided by the updated 2020 PRISMA statement, this study conducts a systematic literature review following five steps: database identification, search strategy development, article selection, data extraction, and synthesis and analysis. Three databases including Web of Science, Scopus and DGRL are searched for peer-reviewed empirical studies published from 2014 or later. Using the Public Service Ecosystem theory as a theoretical lens, this study makes two key contributions: analyzing the distribution of research themes and developing a goal-action framework. This framework not only refines the concept of digital inclusion in public services but also serves as a practical guide for stakeholders.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48258,"journal":{"name":"Government Information Quarterly","volume":"42 2","pages":"Article 102019"},"PeriodicalIF":10.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Digital inclusion in public services for vulnerable groups: A systematic review for research themes and goal-action framework from the lens of public service ecosystem theory\",\"authors\":\"Hui Liu,&nbsp;Qingshan Zhou,&nbsp;Shuang Liang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.giq.2025.102019\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Ensuring access to digital public services for vulnerable groups is a critical issue in digital government and digital inclusion research. Mapping the research trajectory in this domain is essential for fostering a systematic understanding among scholars and policymakers. Guided by the updated 2020 PRISMA statement, this study conducts a systematic literature review following five steps: database identification, search strategy development, article selection, data extraction, and synthesis and analysis. Three databases including Web of Science, Scopus and DGRL are searched for peer-reviewed empirical studies published from 2014 or later. Using the Public Service Ecosystem theory as a theoretical lens, this study makes two key contributions: analyzing the distribution of research themes and developing a goal-action framework. This framework not only refines the concept of digital inclusion in public services but also serves as a practical guide for stakeholders.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48258,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Government Information Quarterly\",\"volume\":\"42 2\",\"pages\":\"Article 102019\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":10.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Government Information Quarterly\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0740624X25000139\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/3/6 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Government Information Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0740624X25000139","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

确保弱势群体获得数字公共服务是数字政府和数字包容研究中的一个关键问题。绘制这一领域的研究轨迹对于促进学者和政策制定者之间的系统理解至关重要。本研究以更新的2020 PRISMA声明为指导,通过数据库识别、搜索策略制定、文章选择、数据提取、综合分析五个步骤进行系统的文献综述。在Web of Science、Scopus和DGRL三个数据库中检索2014年及以后发表的同行评议的实证研究。本研究以公共服务生态系统理论为理论视角,分析了研究主题的分布,构建了目标-行动框架。该框架不仅完善了公共服务中数字包容的概念,而且为利益相关者提供了实用指南。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Digital inclusion in public services for vulnerable groups: A systematic review for research themes and goal-action framework from the lens of public service ecosystem theory
Ensuring access to digital public services for vulnerable groups is a critical issue in digital government and digital inclusion research. Mapping the research trajectory in this domain is essential for fostering a systematic understanding among scholars and policymakers. Guided by the updated 2020 PRISMA statement, this study conducts a systematic literature review following five steps: database identification, search strategy development, article selection, data extraction, and synthesis and analysis. Three databases including Web of Science, Scopus and DGRL are searched for peer-reviewed empirical studies published from 2014 or later. Using the Public Service Ecosystem theory as a theoretical lens, this study makes two key contributions: analyzing the distribution of research themes and developing a goal-action framework. This framework not only refines the concept of digital inclusion in public services but also serves as a practical guide for stakeholders.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Government Information Quarterly
Government Information Quarterly INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
15.70
自引率
16.70%
发文量
106
期刊介绍: Government Information Quarterly (GIQ) delves into the convergence of policy, information technology, government, and the public. It explores the impact of policies on government information flows, the role of technology in innovative government services, and the dynamic between citizens and governing bodies in the digital age. GIQ serves as a premier journal, disseminating high-quality research and insights that bridge the realms of policy, information technology, government, and public engagement.
期刊最新文献
Trustworthy AI in public administration: The PRO-Trust pipeline for ethical fraud detection in public procurement Decentralisation in public sector data platforms: A pathway to enhancing public value? Governing digital government platforms for service innovation: A staged governance model based on boundary resources and coordination activities Beyond technology: Exploring public value creation mechanisms and outcomes in platform-to-government data sharing Operational transparency in government social media communication: Two survey experiments on representation, engagement, and collaboration
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1