IF 2.2 4区 工程技术 Q3 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC Journal of Computational Electronics Pub Date : 2025-03-04 DOI:10.1007/s10825-025-02298-2
Martin Calasan
{"title":"Iterative methods for solving g-functions: a review, comparative evaluation, and application in the solar cell domain","authors":"Martin Calasan","doi":"10.1007/s10825-025-02298-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The voltage–current characteristics of solar cell models, regardless of the equivalent circuits used, are nonlinear functions that can be mathematically represented by the <i>g</i>-function. Computational modeling plays a key role in solving such complex functions, enabling accurate simulations and efficient solutions that are essential for optimizing solar cell performance. This paper first provides a comprehensive overview and comparative evaluation of several iterative methods used to solve the <i>g</i>-function. Next, the accuracy of these iterative methods across both positive and negative values of the functional argument is assessed. The number of iterations required to achieve the desired accuracy is then analyzed, along with the influence of accuracy on the number of iterations. Additionally, the computation times of all the observed methods are examined, along with the impacts of the initial values on the required number of iterations. Finally, the paper demonstrates the application of the proposed iterative methods for voltage calculations within a single-diode model of solar cells. The findings suggest that the Halley iterative method demonstrates superior efficiency, requiring fewer iterations for accurate results and lower computation time, whereas the Newton and Ostrowski methods yield similar performance. MATLAB codes for each iterative method discussed are provided, ensuring their applicability for addressing various engineering challenges related to the <i>g</i>-function.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":620,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Computational Electronics","volume":"24 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Computational Electronics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10825-025-02298-2","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

无论使用何种等效电路,太阳能电池模型的电压-电流特性都是非线性函数,可用 g 函数在数学上表示。计算建模在求解此类复杂函数时起着关键作用,可实现精确模拟和高效求解,这对优化太阳能电池性能至关重要。本文首先对用于求解 g 函数的几种迭代法进行了全面概述和比较评估。接着,评估了这些迭代法在函数参数的正值和负值上的准确性。然后分析了达到预期精度所需的迭代次数,以及精度对迭代次数的影响。此外,还考察了所有观察到的方法的计算时间,以及初始值对所需迭代次数的影响。最后,论文演示了所提出的迭代方法在太阳能电池单二极管模型中电压计算的应用。研究结果表明,哈雷迭代法具有更高的效率,只需较少的迭代次数就能获得精确的结果,并且计算时间更短,而牛顿和奥斯特洛夫斯基方法的性能相似。为讨论的每种迭代法提供了 MATLAB 代码,确保它们适用于解决与 g 函数有关的各种工程难题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Iterative methods for solving g-functions: a review, comparative evaluation, and application in the solar cell domain

The voltage–current characteristics of solar cell models, regardless of the equivalent circuits used, are nonlinear functions that can be mathematically represented by the g-function. Computational modeling plays a key role in solving such complex functions, enabling accurate simulations and efficient solutions that are essential for optimizing solar cell performance. This paper first provides a comprehensive overview and comparative evaluation of several iterative methods used to solve the g-function. Next, the accuracy of these iterative methods across both positive and negative values of the functional argument is assessed. The number of iterations required to achieve the desired accuracy is then analyzed, along with the influence of accuracy on the number of iterations. Additionally, the computation times of all the observed methods are examined, along with the impacts of the initial values on the required number of iterations. Finally, the paper demonstrates the application of the proposed iterative methods for voltage calculations within a single-diode model of solar cells. The findings suggest that the Halley iterative method demonstrates superior efficiency, requiring fewer iterations for accurate results and lower computation time, whereas the Newton and Ostrowski methods yield similar performance. MATLAB codes for each iterative method discussed are provided, ensuring their applicability for addressing various engineering challenges related to the g-function.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Computational Electronics
Journal of Computational Electronics ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC-PHYSICS, APPLIED
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
4.80%
发文量
142
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: he Journal of Computational Electronics brings together research on all aspects of modeling and simulation of modern electronics. This includes optical, electronic, mechanical, and quantum mechanical aspects, as well as research on the underlying mathematical algorithms and computational details. The related areas of energy conversion/storage and of molecular and biological systems, in which the thrust is on the charge transport, electronic, mechanical, and optical properties, are also covered. In particular, we encourage manuscripts dealing with device simulation; with optical and optoelectronic systems and photonics; with energy storage (e.g. batteries, fuel cells) and harvesting (e.g. photovoltaic), with simulation of circuits, VLSI layout, logic and architecture (based on, for example, CMOS devices, quantum-cellular automata, QBITs, or single-electron transistors); with electromagnetic simulations (such as microwave electronics and components); or with molecular and biological systems. However, in all these cases, the submitted manuscripts should explicitly address the electronic properties of the relevant systems, materials, or devices and/or present novel contributions to the physical models, computational strategies, or numerical algorithms.
期刊最新文献
Characteristics of a V-shaped rectenna for 28.3 THz energy harvesting Iterative methods for solving g-functions: a review, comparative evaluation, and application in the solar cell domain Modeling of effective mobility in 3D NAND flash memory with polycrystalline silicon channel Influence of non-metal doping and biaxial strain on the photovoltaic characteristics of monolayer 1T-PtSe2 An efficient computational model for single-molecule optoelectronic devices
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1