如何为新的入侵者建模?在出现100次后,美国入侵的范围模型优于全球或联合范围模型

IF 4.3 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY Ecological Applications Pub Date : 2025-03-04 DOI:10.1002/eap.70010
Nicholas E. Young, Demetra A. Williams, Keana S. Shadwell, Ian S. Pearse, Catherine S. Jarnevich
{"title":"如何为新的入侵者建模?在出现100次后,美国入侵的范围模型优于全球或联合范围模型","authors":"Nicholas E. Young,&nbsp;Demetra A. Williams,&nbsp;Keana S. Shadwell,&nbsp;Ian S. Pearse,&nbsp;Catherine S. Jarnevich","doi":"10.1002/eap.70010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Invasive species are an economic and ecological burden, and efforts to limit their impact are greatly improved with reliable maps based on species distribution models (SDMs). However, the potential distribution of new invaders is difficult to anticipate because they are still spreading with few observations in their invaded habitat. Therefore, an accepted practice in predicting the distribution of invasive species has been to incorporate habitat information from its entire geographic distribution (invaded and native ranges) into SDMs. Yet, this approach, due to niche shifts, niche expansions, and data deficiencies, commonly misrepresents where an invasive species is found in its new range. Here, we use time series records (invasion stages) from 13 invasive plant species in North America to explore the tension between modeling invasive species using global range and invaded range data and to determine if there is a “tipping point” at which one SDM strategy performs better than the other in predicting the ultimate distribution. At the earliest invasion stage, models developed using both invaded range and global occurrences on average performed better and had less variability across species than other model strategies at this stage. However, after as few as 100 observations of an invasive plant had been made, US-invaded range models, on average, outperformed global range models and models that combined occurrences. By building models with global and US-scale predictors, we show that higher performance of invaded range models was in part because of greater data quality at the invaded-range scale. Our work demonstrates that after relatively few observations of an invasive species in its invaded range, it is more accurate to model its potential distribution using only information from the invaded range while disregarding information from other regions. This work develops a robust and comprehensive approach to modeling novel distributions of newly observed invasive species.</p>","PeriodicalId":55168,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Applications","volume":"35 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How to model a new invader? US-invaded range models outperform global or combined range models after 100 occurrences\",\"authors\":\"Nicholas E. Young,&nbsp;Demetra A. Williams,&nbsp;Keana S. Shadwell,&nbsp;Ian S. Pearse,&nbsp;Catherine S. Jarnevich\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/eap.70010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Invasive species are an economic and ecological burden, and efforts to limit their impact are greatly improved with reliable maps based on species distribution models (SDMs). However, the potential distribution of new invaders is difficult to anticipate because they are still spreading with few observations in their invaded habitat. Therefore, an accepted practice in predicting the distribution of invasive species has been to incorporate habitat information from its entire geographic distribution (invaded and native ranges) into SDMs. Yet, this approach, due to niche shifts, niche expansions, and data deficiencies, commonly misrepresents where an invasive species is found in its new range. Here, we use time series records (invasion stages) from 13 invasive plant species in North America to explore the tension between modeling invasive species using global range and invaded range data and to determine if there is a “tipping point” at which one SDM strategy performs better than the other in predicting the ultimate distribution. At the earliest invasion stage, models developed using both invaded range and global occurrences on average performed better and had less variability across species than other model strategies at this stage. However, after as few as 100 observations of an invasive plant had been made, US-invaded range models, on average, outperformed global range models and models that combined occurrences. By building models with global and US-scale predictors, we show that higher performance of invaded range models was in part because of greater data quality at the invaded-range scale. Our work demonstrates that after relatively few observations of an invasive species in its invaded range, it is more accurate to model its potential distribution using only information from the invaded range while disregarding information from other regions. This work develops a robust and comprehensive approach to modeling novel distributions of newly observed invasive species.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55168,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecological Applications\",\"volume\":\"35 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecological Applications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/eap.70010\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Applications","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/eap.70010","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

入侵物种是一种经济和生态负担,基于物种分布模型(SDMs)的可靠地图极大地改善了限制其影响的努力。然而,新入侵物种的潜在分布是难以预测的,因为它们仍然在入侵的栖息地传播,几乎没有观察到。因此,在预测入侵物种的分布时,一种公认的做法是将其整个地理分布(入侵和原生范围)的栖息地信息纳入sdm。然而,由于生态位变化、生态位扩展和数据不足,这种方法通常会错误地描述入侵物种在其新范围内的位置。本文利用北美13种入侵植物物种的时间序列记录(入侵阶段),探讨了使用全球范围和入侵范围数据建模入侵物种之间的紧张关系,并确定是否存在一个“引爆点”,在这个“引爆点”上,一种SDM策略在预测最终分布方面表现得比另一种策略更好。在最早的入侵阶段,使用入侵范围和全球发生的平均模型比其他模型策略表现更好,物种间的变异性更小。然而,在对一种入侵植物进行了100次观察之后,美国入侵范围模型的平均表现优于全球范围模型和结合发生情况的模型。通过构建具有全球和美国尺度预测因子的模型,我们发现入侵范围模型的更高性能部分是由于入侵范围尺度上更高的数据质量。我们的工作表明,在入侵范围内对入侵物种进行相对较少的观察后,仅使用入侵范围的信息而忽略其他区域的信息来模拟其潜在分布更为准确。这项工作开发了一种强大而全面的方法来模拟新观察到的入侵物种的新分布。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
How to model a new invader? US-invaded range models outperform global or combined range models after 100 occurrences

Invasive species are an economic and ecological burden, and efforts to limit their impact are greatly improved with reliable maps based on species distribution models (SDMs). However, the potential distribution of new invaders is difficult to anticipate because they are still spreading with few observations in their invaded habitat. Therefore, an accepted practice in predicting the distribution of invasive species has been to incorporate habitat information from its entire geographic distribution (invaded and native ranges) into SDMs. Yet, this approach, due to niche shifts, niche expansions, and data deficiencies, commonly misrepresents where an invasive species is found in its new range. Here, we use time series records (invasion stages) from 13 invasive plant species in North America to explore the tension between modeling invasive species using global range and invaded range data and to determine if there is a “tipping point” at which one SDM strategy performs better than the other in predicting the ultimate distribution. At the earliest invasion stage, models developed using both invaded range and global occurrences on average performed better and had less variability across species than other model strategies at this stage. However, after as few as 100 observations of an invasive plant had been made, US-invaded range models, on average, outperformed global range models and models that combined occurrences. By building models with global and US-scale predictors, we show that higher performance of invaded range models was in part because of greater data quality at the invaded-range scale. Our work demonstrates that after relatively few observations of an invasive species in its invaded range, it is more accurate to model its potential distribution using only information from the invaded range while disregarding information from other regions. This work develops a robust and comprehensive approach to modeling novel distributions of newly observed invasive species.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ecological Applications
Ecological Applications 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
9.50
自引率
2.00%
发文量
268
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The pages of Ecological Applications are open to research and discussion papers that integrate ecological science and concepts with their application and implications. Of special interest are papers that develop the basic scientific principles on which environmental decision-making should rest, and those that discuss the application of ecological concepts to environmental problem solving, policy, and management. Papers that deal explicitly with policy matters are welcome. Interdisciplinary approaches are encouraged, as are short communications on emerging environmental challenges.
期刊最新文献
An integrated population modeling workflow for supporting mesopredator management. A model to quantify the probability of collision between birds and aircraft: Applications for onboard lighting. Multiscale habitat modeling to improve spatial prioritization for mugger crocodile conservation in riverine landscapes. Resource management as a conservation tool to impact genetic diversity through mating patterns in wild populations. Species-habitat networks reveal key habitats for landscape-level wild bee conservation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1