欧盟电子处方系统的比较:基准开发、使用和未来趋势。

IF 6.8 2区 医学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics Pub Date : 2025-02-17 DOI:10.1109/JBHI.2025.3531317
Jan Bruthans;Georg Duftschmid;Tora Hammar;Przemyslaw Kardas;Lóránt Bertalan;Martin J. Hug;Cille Büllow;Hugo Agius Muscat;Anett Lilleväli;Vesa Jormanainen;Fernando Fernandez-Llimos;Luz Fidalgo;Haralampos Karanikas;Marc Nyssen;Nirvana Popescu;Mária Čudejková;Konstantin Tachkov;Maja Ortner Hadžiabdić;Marios Neofytou;Jurgita Dauksiene;Anneke Huisman;Bríd Ryan;Āris Kasparāns;Matteo Napoleoni;Mirko Perfili;Daisy Smet;Matthieu Calafiore;Dalibor Stanimirovic
{"title":"欧盟电子处方系统的比较:基准开发、使用和未来趋势。","authors":"Jan Bruthans;Georg Duftschmid;Tora Hammar;Przemyslaw Kardas;Lóránt Bertalan;Martin J. Hug;Cille Büllow;Hugo Agius Muscat;Anett Lilleväli;Vesa Jormanainen;Fernando Fernandez-Llimos;Luz Fidalgo;Haralampos Karanikas;Marc Nyssen;Nirvana Popescu;Mária Čudejková;Konstantin Tachkov;Maja Ortner Hadžiabdić;Marios Neofytou;Jurgita Dauksiene;Anneke Huisman;Bríd Ryan;Āris Kasparāns;Matteo Napoleoni;Mirko Perfili;Daisy Smet;Matthieu Calafiore;Dalibor Stanimirovic","doi":"10.1109/JBHI.2025.3531317","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"While Electronic Prescription Systems (EPS) adoption varies across EU Member States, there's a lack of comprehensive comparative analysis. Existing studies focus on single EPSs, employ diverse methodologies, and lack up-to-date data. This study fills this gap by providing a comprehensive overview of EPS development, functionalities, and usage statistics in each EU Member State. Most EU Member States widely adopted EPS by 2022, with exceptions including Germany, France, and Luxembourg, where pilot projects or just plans existed at that time. Out of the 27 EPSs, 25 employ a similar design featuring a central server and end-user software or web-based applications. Among these, 22 are structured as single national systems. The fundamental technical solution is remarkably similar across the EU. Despite these similarities, functionalities, authentication methods, prescription validity, and medication coverage differ significantly among EPSs. A multinational team, including co-authors from each EU Member State, collected data using a structured questionnaire. The study underscores the need for standardized methodologies in EPS research and emphasizes the importance of comprehensive comparative analysis to inform healthcare policies and digitalization efforts.","PeriodicalId":13073,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics","volume":"29 5","pages":"3712-3722"},"PeriodicalIF":6.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Electronic Prescription Systems in the European Union: Benchmarking Development, Use, and Future Trends\",\"authors\":\"Jan Bruthans;Georg Duftschmid;Tora Hammar;Przemyslaw Kardas;Lóránt Bertalan;Martin J. Hug;Cille Büllow;Hugo Agius Muscat;Anett Lilleväli;Vesa Jormanainen;Fernando Fernandez-Llimos;Luz Fidalgo;Haralampos Karanikas;Marc Nyssen;Nirvana Popescu;Mária Čudejková;Konstantin Tachkov;Maja Ortner Hadžiabdić;Marios Neofytou;Jurgita Dauksiene;Anneke Huisman;Bríd Ryan;Āris Kasparāns;Matteo Napoleoni;Mirko Perfili;Daisy Smet;Matthieu Calafiore;Dalibor Stanimirovic\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/JBHI.2025.3531317\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"While Electronic Prescription Systems (EPS) adoption varies across EU Member States, there's a lack of comprehensive comparative analysis. Existing studies focus on single EPSs, employ diverse methodologies, and lack up-to-date data. This study fills this gap by providing a comprehensive overview of EPS development, functionalities, and usage statistics in each EU Member State. Most EU Member States widely adopted EPS by 2022, with exceptions including Germany, France, and Luxembourg, where pilot projects or just plans existed at that time. Out of the 27 EPSs, 25 employ a similar design featuring a central server and end-user software or web-based applications. Among these, 22 are structured as single national systems. The fundamental technical solution is remarkably similar across the EU. Despite these similarities, functionalities, authentication methods, prescription validity, and medication coverage differ significantly among EPSs. A multinational team, including co-authors from each EU Member State, collected data using a structured questionnaire. The study underscores the need for standardized methodologies in EPS research and emphasizes the importance of comprehensive comparative analysis to inform healthcare policies and digitalization efforts.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13073,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics\",\"volume\":\"29 5\",\"pages\":\"3712-3722\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10891153/\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10891153/","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

虽然电子处方系统(EPS)的采用在欧盟成员国之间有所不同,但缺乏全面的比较分析。现有的研究集中在单个eps上,采用不同的方法,缺乏最新的数据。本研究通过提供每个欧盟成员国EPS开发、功能和使用统计数据的全面概述,填补了这一空白。到2022年,大多数欧盟成员国广泛采用了EPS,但德国、法国和卢森堡除外,这些国家当时存在试点项目或计划。在27个eps中,有25个采用了类似的设计,具有中央服务器和最终用户软件或基于web的应用程序。其中22个国家的结构是单一的国家系统。整个欧盟的基本技术解决方案非常相似。尽管有这些相似之处,但功能、认证方法、处方有效性和药物覆盖范围在eps之间存在显著差异。一个跨国团队,包括来自每个欧盟成员国的共同作者,使用结构化问卷收集数据。该研究强调了EPS研究中标准化方法的必要性,并强调了综合比较分析对医疗保健政策和数字化工作的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison of Electronic Prescription Systems in the European Union: Benchmarking Development, Use, and Future Trends
While Electronic Prescription Systems (EPS) adoption varies across EU Member States, there's a lack of comprehensive comparative analysis. Existing studies focus on single EPSs, employ diverse methodologies, and lack up-to-date data. This study fills this gap by providing a comprehensive overview of EPS development, functionalities, and usage statistics in each EU Member State. Most EU Member States widely adopted EPS by 2022, with exceptions including Germany, France, and Luxembourg, where pilot projects or just plans existed at that time. Out of the 27 EPSs, 25 employ a similar design featuring a central server and end-user software or web-based applications. Among these, 22 are structured as single national systems. The fundamental technical solution is remarkably similar across the EU. Despite these similarities, functionalities, authentication methods, prescription validity, and medication coverage differ significantly among EPSs. A multinational team, including co-authors from each EU Member State, collected data using a structured questionnaire. The study underscores the need for standardized methodologies in EPS research and emphasizes the importance of comprehensive comparative analysis to inform healthcare policies and digitalization efforts.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics
IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS-COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
CiteScore
13.60
自引率
6.50%
发文量
1151
期刊介绍: IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics publishes original papers presenting recent advances where information and communication technologies intersect with health, healthcare, life sciences, and biomedicine. Topics include acquisition, transmission, storage, retrieval, management, and analysis of biomedical and health information. The journal covers applications of information technologies in healthcare, patient monitoring, preventive care, early disease diagnosis, therapy discovery, and personalized treatment protocols. It explores electronic medical and health records, clinical information systems, decision support systems, medical and biological imaging informatics, wearable systems, body area/sensor networks, and more. Integration-related topics like interoperability, evidence-based medicine, and secure patient data are also addressed.
期刊最新文献
EEG-VLM: A Hierarchical Vision-Language Model With Multi-Level Feature Alignment and Visually Enhanced Language-Guided Reasoning for EEG Image-Based Sleep Stage Prediction. Evaluating Large Language Models in Crisis Detection: A Real-World Benchmark from Psychological Support Hotlines. FD-MSGL: Drug Repositioning via Frequency-Domain Multi-Source Synergistic Graph Learning. DFCNet: A Precise Detection Approach for Obstructive Sleep Apnea-Hypopnea Events Using Airflow and Respiratory Effort Signals. Leveraging Language Embeddings from EMA Surveys to Predict Perceived Social Isolation among Stroke Survivors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1