三种商用鼻腔喷雾品牌药物沉积模式的比较分析:计算与实验研究

IF 5.2 2区 化学 Q2 CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL Journal of Molecular Liquids Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-02 DOI:10.1016/j.molliq.2025.127276
Guiliang Liu , Mohammad Hossein Doranehgard , Xuan Ruan , Bingkai Chen , Brent Senior , Adam Kimple , Rui Ni , Zheng Li
{"title":"三种商用鼻腔喷雾品牌药物沉积模式的比较分析:计算与实验研究","authors":"Guiliang Liu ,&nbsp;Mohammad Hossein Doranehgard ,&nbsp;Xuan Ruan ,&nbsp;Bingkai Chen ,&nbsp;Brent Senior ,&nbsp;Adam Kimple ,&nbsp;Rui Ni ,&nbsp;Zheng Li","doi":"10.1016/j.molliq.2025.127276","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study investigates drug deposition patterns in nasal drug delivery by combining experimental measurements with computational fluid dynamics simulations. We analyzed three, over the counter, mometasone nasal spray devices, experimentally characterizing particle diameter (dp), spray velocity (up), and spray angle (α). Unlike previous studies that relied on assumed parameters or single-brand analyses, we conducted comparative analyses using measured parameters integrated into COMSOL Multiphysics simulations. The study optimized the Line of Sight (LOS) method by exploring various spray positions and instructions to avoid anterior loss of medication in the anterior nasal cavity. Results revealed that Brand 3, with its narrow spray angle, achieved superior drug delivery efficiency when properly aligned with the target region. However, its performance decreased significantly when misaligned due to its smaller spray cone angle. Our findings show that sprays with narrower cone angles delivered medicine more effectively to the ostiomeatal complex (OMC) with up to 44% higher efficiency using the LOS method. Additionally, in cases with septal deviation, we observed a 14–20% higher drug deposition rate in the right nasal cavity compared to the left. The LOS method significantly improved drug deposition by 2.86–3 times, while the Deep Spray method further enhanced it by 38–50%. This integrated experimental-computational approach provides practical insights for optimizing nasal spray device design and administration techniques, particularly considering anatomical variations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":371,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Molecular Liquids","volume":"425 ","pages":"Article 127276"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative analysis of drug deposition patterns among three commercial nasal spray brands: A computational and experimental study\",\"authors\":\"Guiliang Liu ,&nbsp;Mohammad Hossein Doranehgard ,&nbsp;Xuan Ruan ,&nbsp;Bingkai Chen ,&nbsp;Brent Senior ,&nbsp;Adam Kimple ,&nbsp;Rui Ni ,&nbsp;Zheng Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.molliq.2025.127276\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This study investigates drug deposition patterns in nasal drug delivery by combining experimental measurements with computational fluid dynamics simulations. We analyzed three, over the counter, mometasone nasal spray devices, experimentally characterizing particle diameter (dp), spray velocity (up), and spray angle (α). Unlike previous studies that relied on assumed parameters or single-brand analyses, we conducted comparative analyses using measured parameters integrated into COMSOL Multiphysics simulations. The study optimized the Line of Sight (LOS) method by exploring various spray positions and instructions to avoid anterior loss of medication in the anterior nasal cavity. Results revealed that Brand 3, with its narrow spray angle, achieved superior drug delivery efficiency when properly aligned with the target region. However, its performance decreased significantly when misaligned due to its smaller spray cone angle. Our findings show that sprays with narrower cone angles delivered medicine more effectively to the ostiomeatal complex (OMC) with up to 44% higher efficiency using the LOS method. Additionally, in cases with septal deviation, we observed a 14–20% higher drug deposition rate in the right nasal cavity compared to the left. The LOS method significantly improved drug deposition by 2.86–3 times, while the Deep Spray method further enhanced it by 38–50%. This integrated experimental-computational approach provides practical insights for optimizing nasal spray device design and administration techniques, particularly considering anatomical variations.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":371,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Molecular Liquids\",\"volume\":\"425 \",\"pages\":\"Article 127276\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Molecular Liquids\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"92\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016773222500443X\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/3/2 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Molecular Liquids","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016773222500443X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究通过实验测量和计算流体动力学模拟相结合的方法研究了药物在鼻腔给药中的沉积模式。我们分析了三种非处方莫米松鼻喷雾器,实验表征了颗粒直径(dp)、喷雾速度(up)和喷雾角度(α)。与之前的研究依赖于假设参数或单一品牌分析不同,我们将测量参数集成到COMSOL Multiphysics模拟中进行了比较分析。本研究通过探索不同的喷雾位置和说明来优化视线(Line of Sight, LOS)方法,以避免药物在前鼻腔的前路丢失。结果表明,Brand 3的喷雾角度较窄,在适当对准靶区时,其给药效率较高。然而,由于喷嘴锥角较小,当喷嘴对准不当时,喷嘴的性能明显下降。我们的研究结果表明,较窄锥角的喷雾剂更有效地将药物输送到口鼻道复合体(OMC),使用LOS方法的效率可提高44%。此外,在鼻中隔偏曲的情况下,我们观察到右鼻腔的药物沉积率比左鼻腔高14-20%。LOS法使药物沉积率提高了2.86-3倍,Deep Spray法使药物沉积率提高了38-50%。这种综合的实验计算方法为优化鼻腔喷雾装置的设计和给药技术提供了实用的见解,特别是考虑到解剖变异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparative analysis of drug deposition patterns among three commercial nasal spray brands: A computational and experimental study
This study investigates drug deposition patterns in nasal drug delivery by combining experimental measurements with computational fluid dynamics simulations. We analyzed three, over the counter, mometasone nasal spray devices, experimentally characterizing particle diameter (dp), spray velocity (up), and spray angle (α). Unlike previous studies that relied on assumed parameters or single-brand analyses, we conducted comparative analyses using measured parameters integrated into COMSOL Multiphysics simulations. The study optimized the Line of Sight (LOS) method by exploring various spray positions and instructions to avoid anterior loss of medication in the anterior nasal cavity. Results revealed that Brand 3, with its narrow spray angle, achieved superior drug delivery efficiency when properly aligned with the target region. However, its performance decreased significantly when misaligned due to its smaller spray cone angle. Our findings show that sprays with narrower cone angles delivered medicine more effectively to the ostiomeatal complex (OMC) with up to 44% higher efficiency using the LOS method. Additionally, in cases with septal deviation, we observed a 14–20% higher drug deposition rate in the right nasal cavity compared to the left. The LOS method significantly improved drug deposition by 2.86–3 times, while the Deep Spray method further enhanced it by 38–50%. This integrated experimental-computational approach provides practical insights for optimizing nasal spray device design and administration techniques, particularly considering anatomical variations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Molecular Liquids
Journal of Molecular Liquids 化学-物理:原子、分子和化学物理
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
16.70%
发文量
2597
审稿时长
78 days
期刊介绍: The journal includes papers in the following areas: – Simple organic liquids and mixtures – Ionic liquids – Surfactant solutions (including micelles and vesicles) and liquid interfaces – Colloidal solutions and nanoparticles – Thermotropic and lyotropic liquid crystals – Ferrofluids – Water, aqueous solutions and other hydrogen-bonded liquids – Lubricants, polymer solutions and melts – Molten metals and salts – Phase transitions and critical phenomena in liquids and confined fluids – Self assembly in complex liquids.– Biomolecules in solution The emphasis is on the molecular (or microscopic) understanding of particular liquids or liquid systems, especially concerning structure, dynamics and intermolecular forces. The experimental techniques used may include: – Conventional spectroscopy (mid-IR and far-IR, Raman, NMR, etc.) – Non-linear optics and time resolved spectroscopy (psec, fsec, asec, ISRS, etc.) – Light scattering (Rayleigh, Brillouin, PCS, etc.) – Dielectric relaxation – X-ray and neutron scattering and diffraction. Experimental studies, computer simulations (MD or MC) and analytical theory will be considered for publication; papers just reporting experimental results that do not contribute to the understanding of the fundamentals of molecular and ionic liquids will not be accepted. Only papers of a non-routine nature and advancing the field will be considered for publication.
期刊最新文献
Thermophysical characterization of substances used as flavorings Development of polymeric micellar systems of poloxamer 407 and Soluplus for enhanced solubilization of the antifungal agent LMM6 Investigation of the phase transition behavior and the intermolecular interaction of some hybrid systems obtained from a Schiff base-liquid crystals mixtures, DFT approach A second look at the cavity shape effect on the magnitude of the reversible work of cavity creation New hydrogels based on Fmoc-FF dipeptide with sulfadimethoxine, sulfamethizole, and curcumin: formation kinetics and properties
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1