Jelena Pavlović, Daniel Bos, M Kamran Ikram, M Arfan Ikram, Maryam Kavousi, Maarten J G Leening
{"title":"在指南指导下应用冠状动脉钙评分进行动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病的一级预防。","authors":"Jelena Pavlović, Daniel Bos, M Kamran Ikram, M Arfan Ikram, Maryam Kavousi, Maarten J G Leening","doi":"10.1016/j.jcmg.2024.12.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The 2018 ACC (American College of Cardiology)/AHA (American Heart Association) and 2021 ESC (European Society of Cardiology)/EAS (European Atherosclerosis Society) guidelines recommend coronary artery calcium (CAC) score for risk refinement in primary prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD).</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The study sought to compare CAC utility as a risk-refining tool following the ACC/AHA guideline using pooled cohort equations (PCE) or PREVENT (Predicting Risk of cardiovascular disease EVENTs) equations and ESC/EAS guideline using SCORE2 (Systematic COronary Risk Evaluation 2).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 1,903 statin-naive participants 55 to 75 years of age, free of ASCVD and diabetes, with low-density lipoprotein cholesterol <190 mg/dL from the prospective population-based Rotterdam Study were included. Per the guidelines, we determined proportions of CAC scan-eligible and reclassified men and women, ASCVD incidence rates, and numbers needed to treat for 10 years (NNT<sub>10y</sub>).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>By the ACC/AHA (PCE), 18.3% of men and 11.9% of women, and by ACC/AHA (PREVENT), 13.4% of men and 3.4% of women were eligible for a CAC scan. By the ESC/EAS, 46.6% of men and 44.9% of women were CAC eligible. Proportions of uprisked and derisked individuals varied per guideline. Among ACC/AHA and ESC/EAS CAC-eligible individuals, incidence rates ranged from 9.3 to 23.8 per 1,000 person-years, and the estimated NNT<sub>10y</sub> to prevent 1 ASCVD event, based on high-intensity statin use, varied from 11 to 26.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The ACC/AHA and ESC/EAS guidelines differ in the selection and application of the CAC score for primary prevention of ASCVD. Guideline-directed application of CAC score in a middle-aged apparently healthy population improved risk stratification at an acceptable NNT<sub>10y</sub> for both guidelines.</p>","PeriodicalId":14767,"journal":{"name":"JACC. Cardiovascular imaging","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":12.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Guideline-Directed Application of Coronary Artery Calcium Scores for Primary Prevention of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease.\",\"authors\":\"Jelena Pavlović, Daniel Bos, M Kamran Ikram, M Arfan Ikram, Maryam Kavousi, Maarten J G Leening\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jcmg.2024.12.008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The 2018 ACC (American College of Cardiology)/AHA (American Heart Association) and 2021 ESC (European Society of Cardiology)/EAS (European Atherosclerosis Society) guidelines recommend coronary artery calcium (CAC) score for risk refinement in primary prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD).</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The study sought to compare CAC utility as a risk-refining tool following the ACC/AHA guideline using pooled cohort equations (PCE) or PREVENT (Predicting Risk of cardiovascular disease EVENTs) equations and ESC/EAS guideline using SCORE2 (Systematic COronary Risk Evaluation 2).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 1,903 statin-naive participants 55 to 75 years of age, free of ASCVD and diabetes, with low-density lipoprotein cholesterol <190 mg/dL from the prospective population-based Rotterdam Study were included. Per the guidelines, we determined proportions of CAC scan-eligible and reclassified men and women, ASCVD incidence rates, and numbers needed to treat for 10 years (NNT<sub>10y</sub>).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>By the ACC/AHA (PCE), 18.3% of men and 11.9% of women, and by ACC/AHA (PREVENT), 13.4% of men and 3.4% of women were eligible for a CAC scan. By the ESC/EAS, 46.6% of men and 44.9% of women were CAC eligible. Proportions of uprisked and derisked individuals varied per guideline. Among ACC/AHA and ESC/EAS CAC-eligible individuals, incidence rates ranged from 9.3 to 23.8 per 1,000 person-years, and the estimated NNT<sub>10y</sub> to prevent 1 ASCVD event, based on high-intensity statin use, varied from 11 to 26.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The ACC/AHA and ESC/EAS guidelines differ in the selection and application of the CAC score for primary prevention of ASCVD. Guideline-directed application of CAC score in a middle-aged apparently healthy population improved risk stratification at an acceptable NNT<sub>10y</sub> for both guidelines.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14767,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JACC. Cardiovascular imaging\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":12.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JACC. Cardiovascular imaging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2024.12.008\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JACC. Cardiovascular imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2024.12.008","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Guideline-Directed Application of Coronary Artery Calcium Scores for Primary Prevention of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease.
Background: The 2018 ACC (American College of Cardiology)/AHA (American Heart Association) and 2021 ESC (European Society of Cardiology)/EAS (European Atherosclerosis Society) guidelines recommend coronary artery calcium (CAC) score for risk refinement in primary prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD).
Objectives: The study sought to compare CAC utility as a risk-refining tool following the ACC/AHA guideline using pooled cohort equations (PCE) or PREVENT (Predicting Risk of cardiovascular disease EVENTs) equations and ESC/EAS guideline using SCORE2 (Systematic COronary Risk Evaluation 2).
Methods: A total of 1,903 statin-naive participants 55 to 75 years of age, free of ASCVD and diabetes, with low-density lipoprotein cholesterol <190 mg/dL from the prospective population-based Rotterdam Study were included. Per the guidelines, we determined proportions of CAC scan-eligible and reclassified men and women, ASCVD incidence rates, and numbers needed to treat for 10 years (NNT10y).
Results: By the ACC/AHA (PCE), 18.3% of men and 11.9% of women, and by ACC/AHA (PREVENT), 13.4% of men and 3.4% of women were eligible for a CAC scan. By the ESC/EAS, 46.6% of men and 44.9% of women were CAC eligible. Proportions of uprisked and derisked individuals varied per guideline. Among ACC/AHA and ESC/EAS CAC-eligible individuals, incidence rates ranged from 9.3 to 23.8 per 1,000 person-years, and the estimated NNT10y to prevent 1 ASCVD event, based on high-intensity statin use, varied from 11 to 26.
Conclusions: The ACC/AHA and ESC/EAS guidelines differ in the selection and application of the CAC score for primary prevention of ASCVD. Guideline-directed application of CAC score in a middle-aged apparently healthy population improved risk stratification at an acceptable NNT10y for both guidelines.
期刊介绍：
JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging, part of the prestigious Journal of the American College of Cardiology (JACC) family, offers readers a comprehensive perspective on all aspects of cardiovascular imaging. This specialist journal covers original clinical research on both non-invasive and invasive imaging techniques, including echocardiography, CT, CMR, nuclear, optical imaging, and cine-angiography.
JACC. Cardiovascular imaging highlights advances in basic science and molecular imaging that are expected to significantly impact clinical practice in the next decade. This influence encompasses improvements in diagnostic performance, enhanced understanding of the pathogenetic basis of diseases, and advancements in therapy.
In addition to cutting-edge research,the content of JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging emphasizes practical aspects for the practicing cardiologist, including advocacy and practice management.The journal also features state-of-the-art reviews, ensuring a well-rounded and insightful resource for professionals in the field of cardiovascular imaging.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
