比较脂肪酸的百分比和质量,感官属性,和挥发性香气化合物分离牛肉品质等级

IF 2.9 2区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE Journal of animal science Pub Date : 2025-03-07 DOI:10.1093/jas/skaf069
Chris R Kerth, Gyoungok Gang, Rhonda K Miller, Stephen B Smith
{"title":"比较脂肪酸的百分比和质量,感官属性,和挥发性香气化合物分离牛肉品质等级","authors":"Chris R Kerth, Gyoungok Gang, Rhonda K Miller, Stephen B Smith","doi":"10.1093/jas/skaf069","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We hypothesized that combining sensory flavor attributes, volatile aroma compounds (VAC), and fatty acid composition would better separate beef quality grades than fatty acid composition alone. Select, Choice, Prime, and Grass-fed ribeye rolls (n = 6 per group) were purchased from a local distributor, so production conditions or cattle type were unknown. Select cooked beef steaks ranked lowest for Beef Flavor, Bloody/Serumy, Brown/Roasted, and Umami (P ≤ 0.048). Prime steaks had greater values than other steak types for the VAC 2-methyl-butanal, 2-methyl-propanal (2MP), 3-methyl-butanal (3MB), and 3-hydroxy-2-butanone (3H2B) (P ≤ 0.025). There was a significant, positive correlation of 3MB and 3H2B with Beef Flavor (P ≤ 0.05), and 2MB, 3MB, and 2MP were significantly, positively correlated with Brown/Roasted (P ≤ 0.05). Principal component analysis (PCA) that included fatty acid percentages indicated that all positive flavor attributes clustered with 2MP and 3H2P, Grass-fed, and Prime. A PCA analysis that included mg fatty acid/100 g muscle (i.e., fatty acid mass) segregated all positive flavor attributes and all fatty acids with Grass-fed and Prime steaks, but VAC were not in the same quadrant. Fatty acid percentages, sensory attributes, and VAC were analyzed by partial least squares regression discriminant analysis (PLS-DA), and Grass-fed and Select clustered closely and Prime and Choice clustered separately. Analysis by PLS-DA fatty acid mass, sensory attributes, and VAC indicated that all beef types were distinctly separated. We conclude that including fatty acid composition with sensory attributes and VAC better separates beef quality types than fatty acid composition alone.","PeriodicalId":14895,"journal":{"name":"Journal of animal science","volume":"212 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comparison of fatty acid percentages and mass, sensory attributes, and volatile aroma compounds for segregating beef quality grades\",\"authors\":\"Chris R Kerth, Gyoungok Gang, Rhonda K Miller, Stephen B Smith\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jas/skaf069\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We hypothesized that combining sensory flavor attributes, volatile aroma compounds (VAC), and fatty acid composition would better separate beef quality grades than fatty acid composition alone. Select, Choice, Prime, and Grass-fed ribeye rolls (n = 6 per group) were purchased from a local distributor, so production conditions or cattle type were unknown. Select cooked beef steaks ranked lowest for Beef Flavor, Bloody/Serumy, Brown/Roasted, and Umami (P ≤ 0.048). Prime steaks had greater values than other steak types for the VAC 2-methyl-butanal, 2-methyl-propanal (2MP), 3-methyl-butanal (3MB), and 3-hydroxy-2-butanone (3H2B) (P ≤ 0.025). There was a significant, positive correlation of 3MB and 3H2B with Beef Flavor (P ≤ 0.05), and 2MB, 3MB, and 2MP were significantly, positively correlated with Brown/Roasted (P ≤ 0.05). Principal component analysis (PCA) that included fatty acid percentages indicated that all positive flavor attributes clustered with 2MP and 3H2P, Grass-fed, and Prime. A PCA analysis that included mg fatty acid/100 g muscle (i.e., fatty acid mass) segregated all positive flavor attributes and all fatty acids with Grass-fed and Prime steaks, but VAC were not in the same quadrant. Fatty acid percentages, sensory attributes, and VAC were analyzed by partial least squares regression discriminant analysis (PLS-DA), and Grass-fed and Select clustered closely and Prime and Choice clustered separately. Analysis by PLS-DA fatty acid mass, sensory attributes, and VAC indicated that all beef types were distinctly separated. We conclude that including fatty acid composition with sensory attributes and VAC better separates beef quality types than fatty acid composition alone.\",\"PeriodicalId\":14895,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of animal science\",\"volume\":\"212 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of animal science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/skaf069\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of animal science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/skaf069","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们假设将感官风味属性、挥发性香气化合物(VAC)和脂肪酸组成结合起来比单独的脂肪酸组成更能区分牛肉的品质等级。Select, Choice, Prime和草饲肋眼卷(每组n = 6)从当地经销商处购买,因此生产条件或牛类型未知。牛肉风味、血色/血清色、棕色/烤色和鲜味排名最低的选择熟牛排(P≤0.048)。上等牛排中2-甲基丁醛、2-甲基丙烷(2MP)、3-甲基丁醛(3MB)和3-羟基-2-丁酮(3H2B)的VAC值高于其他牛排(P≤0.025)。3MB、3H2B与牛肉风味呈显著正相关(P≤0.05),2MB、3MB、2MP与Brown/ roast呈显著正相关(P≤0.05)。包括脂肪酸百分比在内的主成分分析(PCA)表明,所有阳性风味属性都聚集在2MP和3H2P、草饲和Prime上。含mg脂肪酸/100 g肌肉(即脂肪酸质量)的PCA分析分离出草饲和优质牛排的所有正风味属性和所有脂肪酸,但VAC不在同一象限。采用偏最小二乘回归判别分析(PLS-DA)对脂肪酸百分比、感官属性和VAC进行分析,草饲和Select紧密聚类,Prime和Choice单独聚类。PLS-DA脂肪酸质量、感官属性和VAC分析表明,所有牛肉类型都有明显的分离。我们得出结论,包括具有感官属性的脂肪酸组成和VAC比单独的脂肪酸组成更能区分牛肉品质类型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A comparison of fatty acid percentages and mass, sensory attributes, and volatile aroma compounds for segregating beef quality grades
We hypothesized that combining sensory flavor attributes, volatile aroma compounds (VAC), and fatty acid composition would better separate beef quality grades than fatty acid composition alone. Select, Choice, Prime, and Grass-fed ribeye rolls (n = 6 per group) were purchased from a local distributor, so production conditions or cattle type were unknown. Select cooked beef steaks ranked lowest for Beef Flavor, Bloody/Serumy, Brown/Roasted, and Umami (P ≤ 0.048). Prime steaks had greater values than other steak types for the VAC 2-methyl-butanal, 2-methyl-propanal (2MP), 3-methyl-butanal (3MB), and 3-hydroxy-2-butanone (3H2B) (P ≤ 0.025). There was a significant, positive correlation of 3MB and 3H2B with Beef Flavor (P ≤ 0.05), and 2MB, 3MB, and 2MP were significantly, positively correlated with Brown/Roasted (P ≤ 0.05). Principal component analysis (PCA) that included fatty acid percentages indicated that all positive flavor attributes clustered with 2MP and 3H2P, Grass-fed, and Prime. A PCA analysis that included mg fatty acid/100 g muscle (i.e., fatty acid mass) segregated all positive flavor attributes and all fatty acids with Grass-fed and Prime steaks, but VAC were not in the same quadrant. Fatty acid percentages, sensory attributes, and VAC were analyzed by partial least squares regression discriminant analysis (PLS-DA), and Grass-fed and Select clustered closely and Prime and Choice clustered separately. Analysis by PLS-DA fatty acid mass, sensory attributes, and VAC indicated that all beef types were distinctly separated. We conclude that including fatty acid composition with sensory attributes and VAC better separates beef quality types than fatty acid composition alone.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of animal science
Journal of animal science 农林科学-奶制品与动物科学
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
12.10%
发文量
1589
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Animal Science (JAS) is the premier journal for animal science and serves as the leading source of new knowledge and perspective in this area. JAS publishes more than 500 fully reviewed research articles, invited reviews, technical notes, and letters to the editor each year. Articles published in JAS encompass a broad range of research topics in animal production and fundamental aspects of genetics, nutrition, physiology, and preparation and utilization of animal products. Articles typically report research with beef cattle, companion animals, goats, horses, pigs, and sheep; however, studies involving other farm animals, aquatic and wildlife species, and laboratory animal species that address fundamental questions related to livestock and companion animal biology will be considered for publication.
期刊最新文献
Clodronate disodium reduced TRAP5b independent of affecting other systemic biomarkers of bone resorption or formation in yearling, exercising Quarter Horses. Tryptophan as a modulator of behavior and productivity in sows: a systematic review. Effects of 3-nitrooxypropanol on methane emissions, rumen fermentation and performance of Hanwoo steers fed an early fattening stage diet. Standardized ileal digestibility of amino acids in four egg products and casein fed to weanling pigs. Learning to Predict Pellet Quality: A Machine Learning and Feature Engineering Approach.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1