加强COVID-19提供者救济、医院财务和医疗保险住院患者的护理。

IF 11.3 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES JAMA Health Forum Pub Date : 2025-03-07 DOI:10.1001/jamahealthforum.2025.0046
Jason D Buxbaum
{"title":"加强COVID-19提供者救济、医院财务和医疗保险住院患者的护理。","authors":"Jason D Buxbaum","doi":"10.1001/jamahealthforum.2025.0046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Congress appropriated $178 billion in emergency relief for health care providers (hospitals, physicians, and other health care professionals) in 2020 to stabilize finances and support the COVID-19 pandemic response. The US Department of Health and Human Services directed $35 billion of these funds to safety-net hospitals and high-impact hospitals using strict criteria. However, the importance of enhanced funding is inadequately understood.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the association between enhanced COVID-19 relief funding and hospital finances and clinical care for Medicare inpatients.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>This retrospective cohort study used a differences-in-discontinuities study design with overlap weighting. Nonrural hospitals with data on costs and fee-for-service Medicare inpatient care for 2018 to 2021. Hospitals near a threshold for receiving high-impact and/or safety-net hospital funding were analyzed. Data were analyzed from July 2022 to January 2025.</p><p><strong>Exposures: </strong>Receipt of high-impact and/or safety-net hospital relief funds.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>Financial outcomes related to revenues, costs, margin, and liquidity and clinical outcomes related to volume, care processes, and mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 555 hospitals were included, with 311 receiving high-impact and/or safety-net hospital funds. Hospitals not receiving enhanced relief averaged $7.0 million in total relief (about $45 000 per bed), while hospitals receiving enhanced relief averaged $15.4 million in total relief (about $100 000 per bed). Operating revenues in 2020 increased by 4.5% (95% CI, 3.0-5.9) among basic relief hospitals and 6.1% (95% CI, 4.6-7.6) among enhanced relief hospitals. However, total costs grew similarly (basic relief: 4.6%; 95% CI, 3.6-5.6; enhanced relief: 4.5%; 95% CI, 3.4-5.7). This resulted in a significant differential increase of 1.4 points (95% CI, 0.3-2.5) in operating margin in association with enhanced relief. Enhanced relief was also associated with limited deterioration in liquidity (differential increase in net asset ratio of 0.03 points; 95% CI, 0-0.05). There was not a significant association between receipt of enhanced relief and fee-for-service Medicare inpatient admissions (-19.6 stays; 95% CI, -281.0 to 241.8), use of a sentinel deferrable procedure among fee-for-service Medicare inpatients (-3.9 admissions for lower joint replacement; 95% CI, -29.6 to 21.7), or use of 2 resource-intensive services among fee-for-service Medicare inpatients (-0.3 admissions with ventilation; 95% CI, -20.8 to 20.2; 0.9 admissions with dialysis; 95% CI, -15.4 to 17.1). Enhanced relief was not detectibly associated with change in the complexity (change in Charlson Comorbidity Index score, 0 points; 95% CI, 0-0) or inpatient mortality (-2.9 deaths; 95% CI, -11.3 to 5.5) for fee-for-service Medicare inpatients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>In this study, enhanced emergency relief for hospitals was associated with improved margins and liquidity without detectible changes in spending or service provision.</p>","PeriodicalId":53180,"journal":{"name":"JAMA Health Forum","volume":"6 3","pages":"e250046"},"PeriodicalIF":11.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11889469/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Enhanced COVID-19 Provider Relief, Hospital Finances, and Care for Medicare Inpatients.\",\"authors\":\"Jason D Buxbaum\",\"doi\":\"10.1001/jamahealthforum.2025.0046\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Congress appropriated $178 billion in emergency relief for health care providers (hospitals, physicians, and other health care professionals) in 2020 to stabilize finances and support the COVID-19 pandemic response. The US Department of Health and Human Services directed $35 billion of these funds to safety-net hospitals and high-impact hospitals using strict criteria. However, the importance of enhanced funding is inadequately understood.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the association between enhanced COVID-19 relief funding and hospital finances and clinical care for Medicare inpatients.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>This retrospective cohort study used a differences-in-discontinuities study design with overlap weighting. Nonrural hospitals with data on costs and fee-for-service Medicare inpatient care for 2018 to 2021. Hospitals near a threshold for receiving high-impact and/or safety-net hospital funding were analyzed. Data were analyzed from July 2022 to January 2025.</p><p><strong>Exposures: </strong>Receipt of high-impact and/or safety-net hospital relief funds.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>Financial outcomes related to revenues, costs, margin, and liquidity and clinical outcomes related to volume, care processes, and mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 555 hospitals were included, with 311 receiving high-impact and/or safety-net hospital funds. Hospitals not receiving enhanced relief averaged $7.0 million in total relief (about $45 000 per bed), while hospitals receiving enhanced relief averaged $15.4 million in total relief (about $100 000 per bed). Operating revenues in 2020 increased by 4.5% (95% CI, 3.0-5.9) among basic relief hospitals and 6.1% (95% CI, 4.6-7.6) among enhanced relief hospitals. However, total costs grew similarly (basic relief: 4.6%; 95% CI, 3.6-5.6; enhanced relief: 4.5%; 95% CI, 3.4-5.7). This resulted in a significant differential increase of 1.4 points (95% CI, 0.3-2.5) in operating margin in association with enhanced relief. Enhanced relief was also associated with limited deterioration in liquidity (differential increase in net asset ratio of 0.03 points; 95% CI, 0-0.05). There was not a significant association between receipt of enhanced relief and fee-for-service Medicare inpatient admissions (-19.6 stays; 95% CI, -281.0 to 241.8), use of a sentinel deferrable procedure among fee-for-service Medicare inpatients (-3.9 admissions for lower joint replacement; 95% CI, -29.6 to 21.7), or use of 2 resource-intensive services among fee-for-service Medicare inpatients (-0.3 admissions with ventilation; 95% CI, -20.8 to 20.2; 0.9 admissions with dialysis; 95% CI, -15.4 to 17.1). Enhanced relief was not detectibly associated with change in the complexity (change in Charlson Comorbidity Index score, 0 points; 95% CI, 0-0) or inpatient mortality (-2.9 deaths; 95% CI, -11.3 to 5.5) for fee-for-service Medicare inpatients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>In this study, enhanced emergency relief for hospitals was associated with improved margins and liquidity without detectible changes in spending or service provision.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":53180,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JAMA Health Forum\",\"volume\":\"6 3\",\"pages\":\"e250046\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":11.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11889469/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JAMA Health Forum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamahealthforum.2025.0046\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA Health Forum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamahealthforum.2025.0046","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

重要性:国会在2020年拨款1780亿美元用于医疗保健提供者(医院、医生和其他医疗保健专业人员)的紧急救济,以稳定财务并支持COVID-19大流行应对。美国卫生与公众服务部按照严格的标准,将其中的350亿美元拨给了安全网医院和高影响力医院。然而,人们对增加资金的重要性认识不足。目的:评价加强COVID-19救助资金与医院财务和医疗保险住院患者临床护理的关系。设计、环境和参与者:本回顾性队列研究采用重叠加权的不连续差异研究设计。非农村医院,提供2018年至2021年医疗保险住院治疗费用和按服务收费的数据。对接近接受高影响力和/或安全网医院资金门槛的医院进行了分析。数据分析时间为2022年7月至2025年1月。暴露:收到高影响力和/或安全网医院救济资金。主要结果和测量:与收入、成本、利润和流动性相关的财务结果和与数量、护理过程和死亡率相关的临床结果。结果:共纳入555家医院,其中311家医院获得高影响和(或)安全网医院资金。未接受强化救济的医院的平均救济总额为700万美元(每张病床约4.5万美元),而接受强化救济的医院的平均救济总额为1540万美元(每张病床约10万美元)。2020年,基本救济医院的营业收入增长4.5%(95%置信区间,3.0-5.9),强化救济医院的营业收入增长6.1%(95%置信区间,4.6-7.6)。然而,总成本也出现了类似的增长(基本缓解:4.6%;95% ci, 3.6-5.6;增强缓解:4.5%;95% ci, 3.4-5.7)。这导致与增强缓解相关的营业利润率显著增加1.4点(95% CI, 0.3-2.5)。缓解的增强还与流动性的有限恶化相关(净资产比率的差异增加0.03个点;95% ci, 0-0.05)。接受强化救济与按服务收费的医疗保险住院人数之间没有显著关联(-19.6次住院;95% CI, -281.0 - 241.8),在按服务收费的医疗保险住院患者中使用哨点延迟手术(-3.9例下肢关节置换术入院;95% CI, -29.6至21.7),或在按服务收费的医疗保险住院患者中使用2种资源密集型服务(-0.3入院时使用通气;95% CI, -20.8 ~ 20.2;0.9例透析入院;95% CI, -15.4 ~ 17.1)。缓解的增强与复杂性的变化没有明显的相关性(Charlson共病指数得分的变化,0分;95% CI, 0-0)或住院病人死亡率(-2.9例死亡;95% CI, -11.3 - 5.5)。结论和相关性:在本研究中,医院紧急救济的加强与利润率和流动性的提高有关,而支出或服务提供没有明显的变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Enhanced COVID-19 Provider Relief, Hospital Finances, and Care for Medicare Inpatients.

Importance: Congress appropriated $178 billion in emergency relief for health care providers (hospitals, physicians, and other health care professionals) in 2020 to stabilize finances and support the COVID-19 pandemic response. The US Department of Health and Human Services directed $35 billion of these funds to safety-net hospitals and high-impact hospitals using strict criteria. However, the importance of enhanced funding is inadequately understood.

Objective: To evaluate the association between enhanced COVID-19 relief funding and hospital finances and clinical care for Medicare inpatients.

Design, setting, and participants: This retrospective cohort study used a differences-in-discontinuities study design with overlap weighting. Nonrural hospitals with data on costs and fee-for-service Medicare inpatient care for 2018 to 2021. Hospitals near a threshold for receiving high-impact and/or safety-net hospital funding were analyzed. Data were analyzed from July 2022 to January 2025.

Exposures: Receipt of high-impact and/or safety-net hospital relief funds.

Main outcomes and measures: Financial outcomes related to revenues, costs, margin, and liquidity and clinical outcomes related to volume, care processes, and mortality.

Results: A total of 555 hospitals were included, with 311 receiving high-impact and/or safety-net hospital funds. Hospitals not receiving enhanced relief averaged $7.0 million in total relief (about $45 000 per bed), while hospitals receiving enhanced relief averaged $15.4 million in total relief (about $100 000 per bed). Operating revenues in 2020 increased by 4.5% (95% CI, 3.0-5.9) among basic relief hospitals and 6.1% (95% CI, 4.6-7.6) among enhanced relief hospitals. However, total costs grew similarly (basic relief: 4.6%; 95% CI, 3.6-5.6; enhanced relief: 4.5%; 95% CI, 3.4-5.7). This resulted in a significant differential increase of 1.4 points (95% CI, 0.3-2.5) in operating margin in association with enhanced relief. Enhanced relief was also associated with limited deterioration in liquidity (differential increase in net asset ratio of 0.03 points; 95% CI, 0-0.05). There was not a significant association between receipt of enhanced relief and fee-for-service Medicare inpatient admissions (-19.6 stays; 95% CI, -281.0 to 241.8), use of a sentinel deferrable procedure among fee-for-service Medicare inpatients (-3.9 admissions for lower joint replacement; 95% CI, -29.6 to 21.7), or use of 2 resource-intensive services among fee-for-service Medicare inpatients (-0.3 admissions with ventilation; 95% CI, -20.8 to 20.2; 0.9 admissions with dialysis; 95% CI, -15.4 to 17.1). Enhanced relief was not detectibly associated with change in the complexity (change in Charlson Comorbidity Index score, 0 points; 95% CI, 0-0) or inpatient mortality (-2.9 deaths; 95% CI, -11.3 to 5.5) for fee-for-service Medicare inpatients.

Conclusions and relevance: In this study, enhanced emergency relief for hospitals was associated with improved margins and liquidity without detectible changes in spending or service provision.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
7.80%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: JAMA Health Forum is an international, peer-reviewed, online, open access journal that addresses health policy and strategies affecting medicine, health, and health care. The journal publishes original research, evidence-based reports, and opinion about national and global health policy. It covers innovative approaches to health care delivery and health care economics, access, quality, safety, equity, and reform. In addition to publishing articles, JAMA Health Forum also features commentary from health policy leaders on the JAMA Forum. It covers news briefs on major reports released by government agencies, foundations, health policy think tanks, and other policy-focused organizations. JAMA Health Forum is a member of the JAMA Network, which is a consortium of peer-reviewed, general medical and specialty publications. The journal presents curated health policy content from across the JAMA Network, including journals such as JAMA and JAMA Internal Medicine.
期刊最新文献
Scanning the Health Care System in the US. Sources of Variation in Cardiovascular Care Cascades. Public Health and Criminal Justice to Reduce Gun Violence. JAMA Health Forum. Private Equity-Acquired Residential Treatment Facilities vs Other For-Profit Facilities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1