对自动驾驶出租车的支付意愿、信任、享乐动机和社会从众的异质性:英国和中国的比较研究

IF 5.7 2区 工程技术 Q1 TRANSPORTATION Travel Behaviour and Society Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-10 DOI:10.1016/j.tbs.2025.100992
Hao Yin , Elisabetta Cherchi
{"title":"对自动驾驶出租车的支付意愿、信任、享乐动机和社会从众的异质性:英国和中国的比较研究","authors":"Hao Yin ,&nbsp;Elisabetta Cherchi","doi":"10.1016/j.tbs.2025.100992","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper presents a study on cross-national heterogeneity between the UK and China in the preferences for Automated Taxis (ATs) and its determinants. A stated choice survey (including level of service, in-vehicle features and social conformity attributes) and a set of psychological statements (to measure trust, hedonic motivation and injunctive norms) were designed and distributed in both countries. Hybrid choice models were estimated to jointly quantify the effects of both objective and psychological factors after controlling for scale. Results confirm strong heterogeneity between the UK and China in the preference for AT and its determinants, also after controlling for differences in individual-related characteristics. Other than travel time and cost, our results confirm the importance of waiting time also in the choice of AT and show the importance of new elements such as in-vehicle features, customer reviews and to less extent the number of customers. Significant heterogeneity is found between the UK and China in all these elements with the exception of in-vehicle features. Among the three latent variables analysed, trust emerges as the most significantly different. The impact of trust in the UK is four times higher than in China, whereas the impact of hedonic motivation is roughly twice as large and the impact of injunctive norms is the same. The marginal rate of substitution suggests that policies aiming at targeting latent constructs might be more effective in the UK than in China.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51534,"journal":{"name":"Travel Behaviour and Society","volume":"40 ","pages":"Article 100992"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Heterogeneity in willingness to pay, trust, hedonic motivation and social conformity towards Automated Taxis: A comparative study between the UK and China\",\"authors\":\"Hao Yin ,&nbsp;Elisabetta Cherchi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.tbs.2025.100992\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This paper presents a study on cross-national heterogeneity between the UK and China in the preferences for Automated Taxis (ATs) and its determinants. A stated choice survey (including level of service, in-vehicle features and social conformity attributes) and a set of psychological statements (to measure trust, hedonic motivation and injunctive norms) were designed and distributed in both countries. Hybrid choice models were estimated to jointly quantify the effects of both objective and psychological factors after controlling for scale. Results confirm strong heterogeneity between the UK and China in the preference for AT and its determinants, also after controlling for differences in individual-related characteristics. Other than travel time and cost, our results confirm the importance of waiting time also in the choice of AT and show the importance of new elements such as in-vehicle features, customer reviews and to less extent the number of customers. Significant heterogeneity is found between the UK and China in all these elements with the exception of in-vehicle features. Among the three latent variables analysed, trust emerges as the most significantly different. The impact of trust in the UK is four times higher than in China, whereas the impact of hedonic motivation is roughly twice as large and the impact of injunctive norms is the same. The marginal rate of substitution suggests that policies aiming at targeting latent constructs might be more effective in the UK than in China.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51534,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Travel Behaviour and Society\",\"volume\":\"40 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100992\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Travel Behaviour and Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214367X25000109\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/3/10 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"TRANSPORTATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Travel Behaviour and Society","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214367X25000109","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"TRANSPORTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文对英国和中国在自动驾驶出租车(ATs)偏好及其决定因素方面的跨国异质性进行了研究。一项明确的选择调查(包括服务水平、车内功能和社会从众属性)和一套心理陈述(衡量信任、享乐动机和禁令规范)被设计并在两个国家分发。在控制尺度后,估计混合选择模型可以共同量化客观因素和心理因素的影响。结果证实,在控制了个体相关特征的差异之后,英国和中国在对AT的偏好及其决定因素方面存在很强的异质性。除了出行时间和成本,我们的研究结果也证实了等待时间在选择自动驾驶汽车中的重要性,并显示了车内功能、客户评论以及客户数量等新因素的重要性。除了车内功能外,英国和中国在所有这些要素上都存在显著的异质性。在分析的三个潜在变量中,信任的差异最为显著。在英国,信任的影响是中国的四倍,而享乐动机的影响大约是中国的两倍,禁令规范的影响是相同的。边际替代率表明,针对潜在构念的政策在英国可能比在中国更有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Heterogeneity in willingness to pay, trust, hedonic motivation and social conformity towards Automated Taxis: A comparative study between the UK and China
This paper presents a study on cross-national heterogeneity between the UK and China in the preferences for Automated Taxis (ATs) and its determinants. A stated choice survey (including level of service, in-vehicle features and social conformity attributes) and a set of psychological statements (to measure trust, hedonic motivation and injunctive norms) were designed and distributed in both countries. Hybrid choice models were estimated to jointly quantify the effects of both objective and psychological factors after controlling for scale. Results confirm strong heterogeneity between the UK and China in the preference for AT and its determinants, also after controlling for differences in individual-related characteristics. Other than travel time and cost, our results confirm the importance of waiting time also in the choice of AT and show the importance of new elements such as in-vehicle features, customer reviews and to less extent the number of customers. Significant heterogeneity is found between the UK and China in all these elements with the exception of in-vehicle features. Among the three latent variables analysed, trust emerges as the most significantly different. The impact of trust in the UK is four times higher than in China, whereas the impact of hedonic motivation is roughly twice as large and the impact of injunctive norms is the same. The marginal rate of substitution suggests that policies aiming at targeting latent constructs might be more effective in the UK than in China.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
7.70%
发文量
109
期刊介绍: Travel Behaviour and Society is an interdisciplinary journal publishing high-quality original papers which report leading edge research in theories, methodologies and applications concerning transportation issues and challenges which involve the social and spatial dimensions. In particular, it provides a discussion forum for major research in travel behaviour, transportation infrastructure, transportation and environmental issues, mobility and social sustainability, transportation geographic information systems (TGIS), transportation and quality of life, transportation data collection and analysis, etc.
期刊最新文献
Commercial OD flow prediction with multi-feature spatial representation learning network From real-world trajectory-level pre-crash data to driving behavior modeling: An inverse reinforcement learning framework based on ghost-probe scenarios Visual integration foraging: a multifactorial optimization and mechanism study of rural wayfinding interfaces Adoption of demand-responsive transportation (DRT) among car-users: who, how, when and why? Is item nonresponse associated with trip underreporting in household travel surveys? evidence from Kumamoto, Japan
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1