土耳其版儿童食物排斥量表的心理测量特性。

IF 4.5 3区 医学 Q2 NUTRITION & DIETETICS Journal of Eating Disorders Pub Date : 2025-03-10 DOI:10.1186/s40337-025-01228-8
Zeynep Caferoglu Akin, Busra Aslan Gonul, Oznur Basdas
{"title":"土耳其版儿童食物排斥量表的心理测量特性。","authors":"Zeynep Caferoglu Akin, Busra Aslan Gonul, Oznur Basdas","doi":"10.1186/s40337-025-01228-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>While some children are open to trying new foods, many exhibit dislike or refusal when encountering them for the first time. These behaviors can be broadly characterized as food neophobia and pickiness, which are believed to be the primary forms of food rejection among children. Because there are differences between countries in early feeding practices and culinary traditions, culturally adapted scales are needed to measure these behaviors. This study aimed to (1) test the reliability and validity of the Turkish adaptation of the Child Food Rejection Scale (CFRS), and (2) examine patterns of food rejection and the correlations between scale scores and sociodemographic characteristics among Turkish children.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The validity of the CFRS translated into Turkish and cross-culturally adapted was assessed by content validity, construct validity, and convergent validity. Internal consistency was measured with Cronbach's alpha coefficient for the scale and its subdimensions. The scale reliability was also evaluated using test-retest reliability and several tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three hundred seventy-five primary caregivers (mainly mothers) of children aged 2 to 7 years were recruited through an online questionnaire. The results confirmed the psychometric soundness of the Turkish CFRS. Construct validity was supported by factor analysis (KMO coefficient = 0.852; Bartlett's sphericity test χ²=1301.580, p < 0.01), with two factors explaining 53.47% of the variance. Internal consistency was high (Cronbach's α = 0.838 for the total scale; α = 0.845 for neophobia, α = 0.600 for pickiness). Test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.770) indicated stability over time. Reliability was further supported by split-half reliability (Spearman-Brown coefficient = 0.749; Guttman split-half coefficient = 0.746), and the scale demonstrated additivity (Tukey's test F = 35.543, p ≤ 0.001) and absence of response bias (Hotelling T-square test F = 63.041, p ≤ 0.001). Confirmatory factor analysis showed good model fit for the two-factor structure, supporting construct validity. Moreover, the rate of food rejection was 21.1%, and CFRS scores did not vary by gender, age, or other sociodemographic characteristics among Turkish children.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Overall, these findings affirm that the adapted CFRS is a reliable and valid tool for assessing food rejection behaviors in Turkish children.</p>","PeriodicalId":48605,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Eating Disorders","volume":"13 1","pages":"43"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11892320/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Psychometric properties of the Turkish version of the child food rejection scale.\",\"authors\":\"Zeynep Caferoglu Akin, Busra Aslan Gonul, Oznur Basdas\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s40337-025-01228-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>While some children are open to trying new foods, many exhibit dislike or refusal when encountering them for the first time. These behaviors can be broadly characterized as food neophobia and pickiness, which are believed to be the primary forms of food rejection among children. Because there are differences between countries in early feeding practices and culinary traditions, culturally adapted scales are needed to measure these behaviors. This study aimed to (1) test the reliability and validity of the Turkish adaptation of the Child Food Rejection Scale (CFRS), and (2) examine patterns of food rejection and the correlations between scale scores and sociodemographic characteristics among Turkish children.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The validity of the CFRS translated into Turkish and cross-culturally adapted was assessed by content validity, construct validity, and convergent validity. Internal consistency was measured with Cronbach's alpha coefficient for the scale and its subdimensions. The scale reliability was also evaluated using test-retest reliability and several tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three hundred seventy-five primary caregivers (mainly mothers) of children aged 2 to 7 years were recruited through an online questionnaire. The results confirmed the psychometric soundness of the Turkish CFRS. Construct validity was supported by factor analysis (KMO coefficient = 0.852; Bartlett's sphericity test χ²=1301.580, p < 0.01), with two factors explaining 53.47% of the variance. Internal consistency was high (Cronbach's α = 0.838 for the total scale; α = 0.845 for neophobia, α = 0.600 for pickiness). Test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.770) indicated stability over time. Reliability was further supported by split-half reliability (Spearman-Brown coefficient = 0.749; Guttman split-half coefficient = 0.746), and the scale demonstrated additivity (Tukey's test F = 35.543, p ≤ 0.001) and absence of response bias (Hotelling T-square test F = 63.041, p ≤ 0.001). Confirmatory factor analysis showed good model fit for the two-factor structure, supporting construct validity. Moreover, the rate of food rejection was 21.1%, and CFRS scores did not vary by gender, age, or other sociodemographic characteristics among Turkish children.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Overall, these findings affirm that the adapted CFRS is a reliable and valid tool for assessing food rejection behaviors in Turkish children.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48605,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Eating Disorders\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"43\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11892320/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Eating Disorders\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40337-025-01228-8\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NUTRITION & DIETETICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Eating Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40337-025-01228-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:虽然有些孩子对尝试新食物持开放态度,但许多孩子在第一次遇到新食物时表现出不喜欢或拒绝。这些行为可以被广泛地描述为新食物恐惧症和挑食,这被认为是儿童食物排斥的主要形式。由于各国在早期喂养做法和烹饪传统方面存在差异,因此需要采用适应文化的量表来衡量这些行为。本研究旨在(1)检验土耳其儿童食物排斥量表(CFRS)的信度和效度,以及(2)检验土耳其儿童食物排斥的模式以及量表得分与社会人口学特征之间的相关性。方法:采用内容效度、结构效度和收敛效度对土耳其语翻译和跨文化改编的CFRS量表进行效度评估。内部一致性用量表及其子维度的Cronbach's alpha系数进行测量。采用重测信度和多次测试对量表信度进行评价。结果:通过在线问卷调查招募了375名2 - 7岁儿童的主要照顾者(主要是母亲)。结果证实了土耳其CFRS的心理测量合理性。因子分析支持构念效度(KMO系数= 0.852;结论:总的来说,这些发现证实了适应性CFRS是评估土耳其儿童食物排斥行为的可靠和有效的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Psychometric properties of the Turkish version of the child food rejection scale.

Background: While some children are open to trying new foods, many exhibit dislike or refusal when encountering them for the first time. These behaviors can be broadly characterized as food neophobia and pickiness, which are believed to be the primary forms of food rejection among children. Because there are differences between countries in early feeding practices and culinary traditions, culturally adapted scales are needed to measure these behaviors. This study aimed to (1) test the reliability and validity of the Turkish adaptation of the Child Food Rejection Scale (CFRS), and (2) examine patterns of food rejection and the correlations between scale scores and sociodemographic characteristics among Turkish children.

Methods: The validity of the CFRS translated into Turkish and cross-culturally adapted was assessed by content validity, construct validity, and convergent validity. Internal consistency was measured with Cronbach's alpha coefficient for the scale and its subdimensions. The scale reliability was also evaluated using test-retest reliability and several tests.

Results: Three hundred seventy-five primary caregivers (mainly mothers) of children aged 2 to 7 years were recruited through an online questionnaire. The results confirmed the psychometric soundness of the Turkish CFRS. Construct validity was supported by factor analysis (KMO coefficient = 0.852; Bartlett's sphericity test χ²=1301.580, p < 0.01), with two factors explaining 53.47% of the variance. Internal consistency was high (Cronbach's α = 0.838 for the total scale; α = 0.845 for neophobia, α = 0.600 for pickiness). Test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.770) indicated stability over time. Reliability was further supported by split-half reliability (Spearman-Brown coefficient = 0.749; Guttman split-half coefficient = 0.746), and the scale demonstrated additivity (Tukey's test F = 35.543, p ≤ 0.001) and absence of response bias (Hotelling T-square test F = 63.041, p ≤ 0.001). Confirmatory factor analysis showed good model fit for the two-factor structure, supporting construct validity. Moreover, the rate of food rejection was 21.1%, and CFRS scores did not vary by gender, age, or other sociodemographic characteristics among Turkish children.

Conclusions: Overall, these findings affirm that the adapted CFRS is a reliable and valid tool for assessing food rejection behaviors in Turkish children.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Eating Disorders
Journal of Eating Disorders Neuroscience-Behavioral Neuroscience
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
17.10%
发文量
161
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Eating Disorders is the first open access, peer-reviewed journal publishing leading research in the science and clinical practice of eating disorders. It disseminates research that provides answers to the important issues and key challenges in the field of eating disorders and to facilitate translation of evidence into practice. The journal publishes research on all aspects of eating disorders namely their epidemiology, nature, determinants, neurobiology, prevention, treatment and outcomes. The scope includes, but is not limited to anorexia nervosa, bulimia nervosa, binge eating disorder and other eating disorders. Related areas such as important co-morbidities, obesity, body image, appetite, food and eating are also included. Articles about research methodology and assessment are welcomed where they advance the field of eating disorders.
期刊最新文献
Self-compassion in flux: a four-year longitudinal study of intraindividual variations in self-compassion and disordered eating. Disentangling food addiction-related symptom profiles in anorexia nervosa: a latent class analysis and clinical implications. Feeling more than understanding: empathic disequilibrium and emotional reactivity in eating psychopathology. Toward a triadic approach in eating disorders: investigating the contribution of the reflexive, affective and interoceptive systems in a clinical data cohort. Bridging the gap between neuroscience and clinical practice: a review of the development of Temperament Based Therapy with Support (TBT-S).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1