劳动力准备好了吗?增材制造中的操作健康和安全问题

IF 6.2 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL Safety Science Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-12 DOI:10.1016/j.ssci.2025.106842
Kirsi Kukko , Anna-Kaisa Viitanen , Sergei Chekurov , Iñigo Flores Ituarte
{"title":"劳动力准备好了吗?增材制造中的操作健康和安全问题","authors":"Kirsi Kukko ,&nbsp;Anna-Kaisa Viitanen ,&nbsp;Sergei Chekurov ,&nbsp;Iñigo Flores Ituarte","doi":"10.1016/j.ssci.2025.106842","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>AM is a rapidly growing and developing industry. As a novel industry, it has been acknowledged that there is a need for research done in the area of occupational health and safety (OHS). This study considers the perspective of the AM technology users and how they receive and implement safety information and what are the gaps and development needs in the area.</div></div><div><h3>Methodology</h3><div>The study was conducted in two steps. First, a comprehensive survey on general OHS topics among international AM professionals was carried out. Second, a focus group interview was conducted with Finnish survey participants. This longitudinal mixed-methods research allowed the collection of OHS information over five years. Data from the survey and focus group interviews were analyzed qualitatively and quantitatively.</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>The results of both survey and focus group interviews indicated that AM technology users have realized they have knowledge gaps in AM safety, especially concerning comprehensive external training. The focus group interviews highlighted a strong culture of self-directed learning and feeling that research on safety of additive manufacturing remains fragmented. Together, this conveys a strong notion that further global research and education on AM-related OHS are necessary to provide better safety guidance to all AM users, including those in industrial, hobbyist, and office. However, to achieve sustainable and safe growth in the AM field, concerted efforts from manufacturers, industry professionals, and regulatory bodies are essential.</div></div><div><h3>Originality</h3><div>To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is pioneering study to gain insight into how AM technology users themselves view OHS issues.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21375,"journal":{"name":"Safety Science","volume":"187 ","pages":"Article 106842"},"PeriodicalIF":6.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is the workforce ready? A look at operational health and safety in additive manufacturing\",\"authors\":\"Kirsi Kukko ,&nbsp;Anna-Kaisa Viitanen ,&nbsp;Sergei Chekurov ,&nbsp;Iñigo Flores Ituarte\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ssci.2025.106842\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>AM is a rapidly growing and developing industry. As a novel industry, it has been acknowledged that there is a need for research done in the area of occupational health and safety (OHS). This study considers the perspective of the AM technology users and how they receive and implement safety information and what are the gaps and development needs in the area.</div></div><div><h3>Methodology</h3><div>The study was conducted in two steps. First, a comprehensive survey on general OHS topics among international AM professionals was carried out. Second, a focus group interview was conducted with Finnish survey participants. This longitudinal mixed-methods research allowed the collection of OHS information over five years. Data from the survey and focus group interviews were analyzed qualitatively and quantitatively.</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>The results of both survey and focus group interviews indicated that AM technology users have realized they have knowledge gaps in AM safety, especially concerning comprehensive external training. The focus group interviews highlighted a strong culture of self-directed learning and feeling that research on safety of additive manufacturing remains fragmented. Together, this conveys a strong notion that further global research and education on AM-related OHS are necessary to provide better safety guidance to all AM users, including those in industrial, hobbyist, and office. However, to achieve sustainable and safe growth in the AM field, concerted efforts from manufacturers, industry professionals, and regulatory bodies are essential.</div></div><div><h3>Originality</h3><div>To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is pioneering study to gain insight into how AM technology users themselves view OHS issues.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21375,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Safety Science\",\"volume\":\"187 \",\"pages\":\"Article 106842\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Safety Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925753525000670\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/3/12 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Safety Science","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925753525000670","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

am是一个快速增长和发展的行业。作为一个新兴产业,人们认识到有必要在职业健康和安全领域进行研究。本研究考虑了AM技术用户的视角,以及他们如何接收和实施安全信息,以及该领域的差距和发展需求。本研究分两步进行。首先,对国际增材制造专业人员的一般职业健康安全主题进行了全面调查。其次,对芬兰调查参与者进行焦点小组访谈。这种纵向混合方法研究允许收集超过五年的职业健康安全信息。从调查和焦点小组访谈的数据进行定性和定量分析。调查结果和焦点小组访谈的结果表明,增材制造技术用户已经意识到他们在增材制造安全方面存在知识差距,特别是在全面的外部培训方面。焦点小组访谈强调了强大的自主学习文化,并认为增材制造安全研究仍然分散。总之,这传达了一个强烈的观念,即有必要进一步开展与AM相关的职业健康安全的全球研究和教育,为所有AM用户(包括工业、业余爱好者和办公室用户)提供更好的安全指导。然而,要实现增材制造领域的可持续和安全增长,制造商、行业专业人士和监管机构的共同努力至关重要。据作者所知,这是一项开创性的研究,旨在深入了解AM技术用户自己如何看待OHS问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Is the workforce ready? A look at operational health and safety in additive manufacturing

Purpose

AM is a rapidly growing and developing industry. As a novel industry, it has been acknowledged that there is a need for research done in the area of occupational health and safety (OHS). This study considers the perspective of the AM technology users and how they receive and implement safety information and what are the gaps and development needs in the area.

Methodology

The study was conducted in two steps. First, a comprehensive survey on general OHS topics among international AM professionals was carried out. Second, a focus group interview was conducted with Finnish survey participants. This longitudinal mixed-methods research allowed the collection of OHS information over five years. Data from the survey and focus group interviews were analyzed qualitatively and quantitatively.

Findings

The results of both survey and focus group interviews indicated that AM technology users have realized they have knowledge gaps in AM safety, especially concerning comprehensive external training. The focus group interviews highlighted a strong culture of self-directed learning and feeling that research on safety of additive manufacturing remains fragmented. Together, this conveys a strong notion that further global research and education on AM-related OHS are necessary to provide better safety guidance to all AM users, including those in industrial, hobbyist, and office. However, to achieve sustainable and safe growth in the AM field, concerted efforts from manufacturers, industry professionals, and regulatory bodies are essential.

Originality

To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is pioneering study to gain insight into how AM technology users themselves view OHS issues.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Safety Science
Safety Science 管理科学-工程:工业
CiteScore
13.00
自引率
9.80%
发文量
335
审稿时长
53 days
期刊介绍: Safety Science is multidisciplinary. Its contributors and its audience range from social scientists to engineers. The journal covers the physics and engineering of safety; its social, policy and organizational aspects; the assessment, management and communication of risks; the effectiveness of control and management techniques for safety; standardization, legislation, inspection, insurance, costing aspects, human behavior and safety and the like. Papers addressing the interfaces between technology, people and organizations are especially welcome.
期刊最新文献
Generative adaptive resilience: LLM-MILP modeling and strategy generation for port vessel scheduling Applications of artificial intelligence in the detection and prevention of assaults against healthcare Staff: A systematic review Case-Based Reasoning Augmented Large Language Model Framework for Decision Making in Realistic Safety-Critical Driving Scenarios The relationships between subjective mental load, cognitive appraisals, and cognitive biases of risk-taking, depending on firefighters’ personality: a longitudinal hierarchical linear modelling approach Evaluating healthcare professionals’ perceptions of medicine risk communications: A survey with Quantitative and Qualitative Analyses
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1