固体生物燃料的绝对环境可持续性:不同环境生态绩效指标的调查

IF 9.6 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Sustainable Production and Consumption Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-08 DOI:10.1016/j.spc.2025.03.004
D.A. Lopes Silva , D.V. Silva , A.C. Farrapo Junior , Y. Xue , B. Bakshi
{"title":"固体生物燃料的绝对环境可持续性:不同环境生态绩效指标的调查","authors":"D.A. Lopes Silva ,&nbsp;D.V. Silva ,&nbsp;A.C. Farrapo Junior ,&nbsp;Y. Xue ,&nbsp;B. Bakshi","doi":"10.1016/j.spc.2025.03.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Research on the absolute environmental sustainability of biofuels is limited, and no studies to date have focused on the biomass pellet sector. Net environmental-ecological performance models can be used to quantify absolute sustainability in a life cycle approach, and this investigation provided an analysis of them in the context of biomass pellets as a case study. Four models were compared, where two models are based on results expressed in biophysical units, and two are given in monetary units. All the models were applied in a cradle-to-gate perspective for the two types of biomass pellets: pine pellets and peanut shell pellets. Ten environmental categories were investigated, and the results showed that the pine pellets were the best option and closer to an absolute sustainable profile. The problem with monetary-based models is the loss of accuracy in results. However, the communication of the results for non-experts could be based on monetary terms as they express the main findings more simply. To assist different stakeholders we provided recommendations on which model to apply in bioenergy systems.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48619,"journal":{"name":"Sustainable Production and Consumption","volume":"55 ","pages":"Pages 407-419"},"PeriodicalIF":9.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Absolute environmental sustainability of solid biofuels: An investigation by different environmental-ecological performance indicators\",\"authors\":\"D.A. Lopes Silva ,&nbsp;D.V. Silva ,&nbsp;A.C. Farrapo Junior ,&nbsp;Y. Xue ,&nbsp;B. Bakshi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.spc.2025.03.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Research on the absolute environmental sustainability of biofuels is limited, and no studies to date have focused on the biomass pellet sector. Net environmental-ecological performance models can be used to quantify absolute sustainability in a life cycle approach, and this investigation provided an analysis of them in the context of biomass pellets as a case study. Four models were compared, where two models are based on results expressed in biophysical units, and two are given in monetary units. All the models were applied in a cradle-to-gate perspective for the two types of biomass pellets: pine pellets and peanut shell pellets. Ten environmental categories were investigated, and the results showed that the pine pellets were the best option and closer to an absolute sustainable profile. The problem with monetary-based models is the loss of accuracy in results. However, the communication of the results for non-experts could be based on monetary terms as they express the main findings more simply. To assist different stakeholders we provided recommendations on which model to apply in bioenergy systems.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48619,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sustainable Production and Consumption\",\"volume\":\"55 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 407-419\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sustainable Production and Consumption\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352550925000545\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/3/8 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sustainable Production and Consumption","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352550925000545","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对生物燃料的绝对环境可持续性的研究是有限的,迄今为止还没有研究集中在生物质颗粒部门。净环境-生态绩效模型可用于在生命周期方法中量化绝对可持续性,本研究以生物质颗粒为例对其进行了分析。对四种模型进行了比较,其中两种模型基于以生物物理单位表示的结果,两种模型以货币单位给出。所有模型都从摇篮到大门的角度应用于两种类型的生物质颗粒:松木颗粒和花生壳颗粒。对10个环境类别进行了调查,结果表明,松木颗粒是最佳选择,更接近绝对可持续的轮廓。以货币为基础的模型的问题在于其结果失去了准确性。然而,对于非专家来说,结果的交流可以基于货币术语,因为它们更简单地表达了主要的发现。为了帮助不同的利益相关者,我们提供了在生物能源系统中应用哪种模型的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Absolute environmental sustainability of solid biofuels: An investigation by different environmental-ecological performance indicators
Research on the absolute environmental sustainability of biofuels is limited, and no studies to date have focused on the biomass pellet sector. Net environmental-ecological performance models can be used to quantify absolute sustainability in a life cycle approach, and this investigation provided an analysis of them in the context of biomass pellets as a case study. Four models were compared, where two models are based on results expressed in biophysical units, and two are given in monetary units. All the models were applied in a cradle-to-gate perspective for the two types of biomass pellets: pine pellets and peanut shell pellets. Ten environmental categories were investigated, and the results showed that the pine pellets were the best option and closer to an absolute sustainable profile. The problem with monetary-based models is the loss of accuracy in results. However, the communication of the results for non-experts could be based on monetary terms as they express the main findings more simply. To assist different stakeholders we provided recommendations on which model to apply in bioenergy systems.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Sustainable Production and Consumption
Sustainable Production and Consumption Environmental Science-Environmental Engineering
CiteScore
17.40
自引率
7.40%
发文量
389
审稿时长
13 days
期刊介绍: Sustainable production and consumption refers to the production and utilization of goods and services in a way that benefits society, is economically viable, and has minimal environmental impact throughout its entire lifespan. Our journal is dedicated to publishing top-notch interdisciplinary research and practical studies in this emerging field. We take a distinctive approach by examining the interplay between technology, consumption patterns, and policy to identify sustainable solutions for both production and consumption systems.
期刊最新文献
Trade-off or synergy: How is the carbon footprint of agricultural food products linked to other environmental impacts? Environmental life cycle assessment of novel PV systems for desert conditions A dynamic social-life cycle assessment based framework for social risk assessment Resource efficiency for closed-loop circularity of building insulation materials in Europe “Made in Germany”? Labour, wages and carbon footprints of consumption and production of the motor vehicles industry
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1