TRIGA研究堆人用可靠性分析框架具体性能塑造因子更新建议

IF 11 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL Reliability Engineering & System Safety Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-08 DOI:10.1016/j.ress.2025.111010
Wasin Vechgama , Jinkyun Park , Yochan Kim , Saensuk Wetchagarun , Anantachai Pechrak , Weerawat Pornroongruengchok , Kampanart Silva
{"title":"TRIGA研究堆人用可靠性分析框架具体性能塑造因子更新建议","authors":"Wasin Vechgama ,&nbsp;Jinkyun Park ,&nbsp;Yochan Kim ,&nbsp;Saensuk Wetchagarun ,&nbsp;Anantachai Pechrak ,&nbsp;Weerawat Pornroongruengchok ,&nbsp;Kampanart Silva","doi":"10.1016/j.ress.2025.111010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Based on the human reliability analysis (HRA) framework of the TRIGA research reactor, performance shaping factor (PSF) estimation is an important step when considering the effects of specific operating or working cultures in determining human error probabilities (HEPs). This study aims to suggest a method to develop specific PSFs for the HRA framework of the TRIGA research reactor through a TRR-1/M1 case study. The PSF survey of the HRA framework was developed based on the EMBRACE method to consider the negative impacts of each PSF compared to the normal situation of all four cognitive activities in the errors of omission and errors of commission modes. Given the varied experiences of experts, expert elicitation was employed to categorize high-performing, low-performing, and informative experts to ensure reliable data for PSF analysis. For low-performing and informative experts, the survey results of PSFs were improved by additional surveys to support an appropriate dataset for analyzing the PSFs of the HRA framework. The impact of PSFs within the HRA framework was estimated using the updated normal distribution of the posterior PSFs based on the classical model. The success likelihood index method successfully integrated all subjective expert judgments into a cohesive representation and offered a better systematic consensus model to generalize HEPs in the form of a normal distribution based on a large group of experts.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54500,"journal":{"name":"Reliability Engineering & System Safety","volume":"260 ","pages":"Article 111010"},"PeriodicalIF":11.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Suggestion of specific performance shaping factor update for the human reliability analysis framework of the TRIGA research reactor\",\"authors\":\"Wasin Vechgama ,&nbsp;Jinkyun Park ,&nbsp;Yochan Kim ,&nbsp;Saensuk Wetchagarun ,&nbsp;Anantachai Pechrak ,&nbsp;Weerawat Pornroongruengchok ,&nbsp;Kampanart Silva\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ress.2025.111010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Based on the human reliability analysis (HRA) framework of the TRIGA research reactor, performance shaping factor (PSF) estimation is an important step when considering the effects of specific operating or working cultures in determining human error probabilities (HEPs). This study aims to suggest a method to develop specific PSFs for the HRA framework of the TRIGA research reactor through a TRR-1/M1 case study. The PSF survey of the HRA framework was developed based on the EMBRACE method to consider the negative impacts of each PSF compared to the normal situation of all four cognitive activities in the errors of omission and errors of commission modes. Given the varied experiences of experts, expert elicitation was employed to categorize high-performing, low-performing, and informative experts to ensure reliable data for PSF analysis. For low-performing and informative experts, the survey results of PSFs were improved by additional surveys to support an appropriate dataset for analyzing the PSFs of the HRA framework. The impact of PSFs within the HRA framework was estimated using the updated normal distribution of the posterior PSFs based on the classical model. The success likelihood index method successfully integrated all subjective expert judgments into a cohesive representation and offered a better systematic consensus model to generalize HEPs in the form of a normal distribution based on a large group of experts.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54500,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Reliability Engineering & System Safety\",\"volume\":\"260 \",\"pages\":\"Article 111010\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":11.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Reliability Engineering & System Safety\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S095183202500211X\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/3/8 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reliability Engineering & System Safety","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S095183202500211X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

基于TRIGA研究堆的人为可靠性分析(HRA)框架,性能塑造因子(PSF)估算是在确定人为错误概率(HEPs)时考虑特定操作或工作文化影响的重要步骤。本研究旨在通过TRR-1/M1案例研究,提出一种为TRIGA研究堆HRA框架开发特定psf的方法。HRA框架的PSF调查是基于EMBRACE方法开发的,以考虑在遗漏错误和委托错误模式下所有四种认知活动的正常情况下,每个PSF的负面影响。鉴于专家的不同经验,采用专家启发法对高绩效、低绩效和信息丰富的专家进行分类,以确保PSF分析的数据可靠。对于表现不佳和信息丰富的专家,通过额外的调查来改善psf的调查结果,以支持适当的数据集来分析HRA框架的psf。使用基于经典模型的后验psf的更新正态分布来估计HRA框架内psf的影响。成功似然指数方法成功地将所有主观专家判断整合到一个内聚表示中,并提供了一个更好的系统共识模型,以基于大量专家的正态分布形式概括hep。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Suggestion of specific performance shaping factor update for the human reliability analysis framework of the TRIGA research reactor
Based on the human reliability analysis (HRA) framework of the TRIGA research reactor, performance shaping factor (PSF) estimation is an important step when considering the effects of specific operating or working cultures in determining human error probabilities (HEPs). This study aims to suggest a method to develop specific PSFs for the HRA framework of the TRIGA research reactor through a TRR-1/M1 case study. The PSF survey of the HRA framework was developed based on the EMBRACE method to consider the negative impacts of each PSF compared to the normal situation of all four cognitive activities in the errors of omission and errors of commission modes. Given the varied experiences of experts, expert elicitation was employed to categorize high-performing, low-performing, and informative experts to ensure reliable data for PSF analysis. For low-performing and informative experts, the survey results of PSFs were improved by additional surveys to support an appropriate dataset for analyzing the PSFs of the HRA framework. The impact of PSFs within the HRA framework was estimated using the updated normal distribution of the posterior PSFs based on the classical model. The success likelihood index method successfully integrated all subjective expert judgments into a cohesive representation and offered a better systematic consensus model to generalize HEPs in the form of a normal distribution based on a large group of experts.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Reliability Engineering & System Safety
Reliability Engineering & System Safety 管理科学-工程:工业
CiteScore
15.20
自引率
39.50%
发文量
621
审稿时长
67 days
期刊介绍: Elsevier publishes Reliability Engineering & System Safety in association with the European Safety and Reliability Association and the Safety Engineering and Risk Analysis Division. The international journal is devoted to developing and applying methods to enhance the safety and reliability of complex technological systems, like nuclear power plants, chemical plants, hazardous waste facilities, space systems, offshore and maritime systems, transportation systems, constructed infrastructure, and manufacturing plants. The journal normally publishes only articles that involve the analysis of substantive problems related to the reliability of complex systems or present techniques and/or theoretical results that have a discernable relationship to the solution of such problems. An important aim is to balance academic material and practical applications.
期刊最新文献
A data-efficient surrogate-based structural reliability approach using a firefly-optimized deep neural network: Application to hang-off drilling riser evacuations Maintenance planning for nonlinearly degrading systems: a reliability-constrained non-periodic inspection strategy A novel event tree analysis-graphical evaluation and review technique network model for comprehensive fault analysis in rocket hydrogen-oxygen refueling A bivariate Wiener degradation model with partially random scale weights A hybrid static–dynamic human reliability framework based on proportional hazard modeling and causally weighted performance shaping factors
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1