论神经网络的不确定性原理

IF 4.1 2区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES iScience Pub Date : 2025-04-18 Epub Date: 2025-03-10 DOI:10.1016/j.isci.2025.112197
Jun-Jie Zhang , Dong-Xiao Zhang , Jian-Nan Chen , Long-Gang Pang , Deyu Meng
{"title":"论神经网络的不确定性原理","authors":"Jun-Jie Zhang ,&nbsp;Dong-Xiao Zhang ,&nbsp;Jian-Nan Chen ,&nbsp;Long-Gang Pang ,&nbsp;Deyu Meng","doi":"10.1016/j.isci.2025.112197","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In this study, we explore the inherent trade-off between accuracy and robustness in neural networks, drawing an analogy to the uncertainty principle in quantum mechanics. We propose that neural networks are subject to an uncertainty relation, which manifests as a fundamental limitation in their ability to simultaneously achieve high accuracy and robustness against adversarial attacks. Through mathematical proofs and empirical evidence, we demonstrate that this trade-off is a natural consequence of the sharp boundaries formed between different class concepts during training. Our findings reveal that the complementarity principle, a cornerstone of quantum physics, applies to neural networks, imposing fundamental limits on their capabilities in simultaneous learning of conjugate features. Meanwhile, our work suggests that achieving human-level intelligence through a single-network architecture or massive datasets alone may be inherently limited. Our work provides new insights into the theoretical foundations of neural network vulnerability and opens up avenues for designing more robust neural network architectures.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":342,"journal":{"name":"iScience","volume":"28 4","pages":"Article 112197"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On the uncertainty principle of neural networks\",\"authors\":\"Jun-Jie Zhang ,&nbsp;Dong-Xiao Zhang ,&nbsp;Jian-Nan Chen ,&nbsp;Long-Gang Pang ,&nbsp;Deyu Meng\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.isci.2025.112197\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>In this study, we explore the inherent trade-off between accuracy and robustness in neural networks, drawing an analogy to the uncertainty principle in quantum mechanics. We propose that neural networks are subject to an uncertainty relation, which manifests as a fundamental limitation in their ability to simultaneously achieve high accuracy and robustness against adversarial attacks. Through mathematical proofs and empirical evidence, we demonstrate that this trade-off is a natural consequence of the sharp boundaries formed between different class concepts during training. Our findings reveal that the complementarity principle, a cornerstone of quantum physics, applies to neural networks, imposing fundamental limits on their capabilities in simultaneous learning of conjugate features. Meanwhile, our work suggests that achieving human-level intelligence through a single-network architecture or massive datasets alone may be inherently limited. Our work provides new insights into the theoretical foundations of neural network vulnerability and opens up avenues for designing more robust neural network architectures.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":342,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"iScience\",\"volume\":\"28 4\",\"pages\":\"Article 112197\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"iScience\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589004225004584\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/3/10 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"iScience","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589004225004584","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在这项研究中,我们探讨了神经网络中准确性和鲁棒性之间的内在权衡,类比于量子力学中的不确定性原理。我们提出神经网络受制于不确定性关系,这表现为其同时实现高精度和抗对抗性攻击鲁棒性的能力的基本限制。通过数学证明和经验证据,我们证明了这种权衡是训练过程中不同类概念之间形成的尖锐界限的自然结果。我们的研究结果表明,互补原理(量子物理学的基石)适用于神经网络,对其同时学习共轭特征的能力施加了基本限制。与此同时,我们的工作表明,仅通过单一网络架构或大规模数据集来实现人类水平的智能可能具有固有的局限性。我们的工作为神经网络脆弱性的理论基础提供了新的见解,并为设计更健壮的神经网络架构开辟了道路。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
On the uncertainty principle of neural networks
In this study, we explore the inherent trade-off between accuracy and robustness in neural networks, drawing an analogy to the uncertainty principle in quantum mechanics. We propose that neural networks are subject to an uncertainty relation, which manifests as a fundamental limitation in their ability to simultaneously achieve high accuracy and robustness against adversarial attacks. Through mathematical proofs and empirical evidence, we demonstrate that this trade-off is a natural consequence of the sharp boundaries formed between different class concepts during training. Our findings reveal that the complementarity principle, a cornerstone of quantum physics, applies to neural networks, imposing fundamental limits on their capabilities in simultaneous learning of conjugate features. Meanwhile, our work suggests that achieving human-level intelligence through a single-network architecture or massive datasets alone may be inherently limited. Our work provides new insights into the theoretical foundations of neural network vulnerability and opens up avenues for designing more robust neural network architectures.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
iScience
iScience Multidisciplinary-Multidisciplinary
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
1.70%
发文量
1972
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: Science has many big remaining questions. To address them, we will need to work collaboratively and across disciplines. The goal of iScience is to help fuel that type of interdisciplinary thinking. iScience is a new open-access journal from Cell Press that provides a platform for original research in the life, physical, and earth sciences. The primary criterion for publication in iScience is a significant contribution to a relevant field combined with robust results and underlying methodology. The advances appearing in iScience include both fundamental and applied investigations across this interdisciplinary range of topic areas. To support transparency in scientific investigation, we are happy to consider replication studies and papers that describe negative results. We know you want your work to be published quickly and to be widely visible within your community and beyond. With the strong international reputation of Cell Press behind it, publication in iScience will help your work garner the attention and recognition it merits. Like all Cell Press journals, iScience prioritizes rapid publication. Our editorial team pays special attention to high-quality author service and to efficient, clear-cut decisions based on the information available within the manuscript. iScience taps into the expertise across Cell Press journals and selected partners to inform our editorial decisions and help publish your science in a timely and seamless way.
期刊最新文献
Thermodynamically enabled and reaction attuned estimation of metabolic fluxes Tracing pesticides through terrestrial food webs with wildlife at risk Early detection and subtyping of gastric cancer: A cell-free DNA fragmentome-based liquid biopsy method BullFish: Software for an automated stepwise analysis of positional and postural kinematics of zebrafish locomotion Immune-metabolic profiling of triple-negative breast cancer during neoadjuvant chemotherapy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1