基于在线聊天的人工智能系统对性别确认护理心血管影响的信息评估

IF 2.5 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS CJC Open Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-30 DOI:10.1016/j.cjco.2024.11.020
Brototo Deb MD, MIDS , Michael Fradley MD , Stephen Cook MD , Geoffrey D. Barnes MD, MSc
{"title":"基于在线聊天的人工智能系统对性别确认护理心血管影响的信息评估","authors":"Brototo Deb MD, MIDS ,&nbsp;Michael Fradley MD ,&nbsp;Stephen Cook MD ,&nbsp;Geoffrey D. Barnes MD, MSc","doi":"10.1016/j.cjco.2024.11.020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Because of restrictive laws in multiple states for gender-affirming care, patients might be prompted to get recommendations from contemporary online chatbots. This study explored the appropriateness of such recommendations using validated tools to assess patient education materials by a team of LGBTQ-affirming cardiologists. The study showed that although all systems emphasize the need for multidisciplinary care, there were notable differences in the comprehensiveness, cultural appropriateness, and presentation of their responses. GPT-4 (<span><span>https://chatbotapp.ai</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>) and Gemini (<span><span>https://gemini.google.com/app</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>) outperformed Bing (<span><span>https://copilot.microsoft.com</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>), particularly in the balanced and culturally sensitive delivery of information.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36924,"journal":{"name":"CJC Open","volume":"7 3","pages":"Pages 338-343"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of Information About Cardiovascular Implications of Gender-Affirming Care From Online Chat-based Artificial Intelligence Systems\",\"authors\":\"Brototo Deb MD, MIDS ,&nbsp;Michael Fradley MD ,&nbsp;Stephen Cook MD ,&nbsp;Geoffrey D. Barnes MD, MSc\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cjco.2024.11.020\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Because of restrictive laws in multiple states for gender-affirming care, patients might be prompted to get recommendations from contemporary online chatbots. This study explored the appropriateness of such recommendations using validated tools to assess patient education materials by a team of LGBTQ-affirming cardiologists. The study showed that although all systems emphasize the need for multidisciplinary care, there were notable differences in the comprehensiveness, cultural appropriateness, and presentation of their responses. GPT-4 (<span><span>https://chatbotapp.ai</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>) and Gemini (<span><span>https://gemini.google.com/app</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>) outperformed Bing (<span><span>https://copilot.microsoft.com</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>), particularly in the balanced and culturally sensitive delivery of information.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36924,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"CJC Open\",\"volume\":\"7 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 338-343\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"CJC Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589790X24006000\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/11/30 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CJC Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589790X24006000","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

由于多个州对性别确认护理的限制性法律,患者可能会被提示从当代在线聊天机器人那里获得建议。本研究由一组确认lgbtq的心脏病专家使用经过验证的工具来评估患者教育材料,探讨了这些建议的适当性。研究表明,虽然所有的系统都强调需要多学科的护理,但在综合性、文化适宜性和其反应的表现方面存在显著差异。GPT-4 (https://chatbotapp.ai)和Gemini (https://gemini.google.com/app)的表现优于必应(https://copilot.microsoft.com),特别是在平衡和文化敏感的信息传递方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluation of Information About Cardiovascular Implications of Gender-Affirming Care From Online Chat-based Artificial Intelligence Systems
Because of restrictive laws in multiple states for gender-affirming care, patients might be prompted to get recommendations from contemporary online chatbots. This study explored the appropriateness of such recommendations using validated tools to assess patient education materials by a team of LGBTQ-affirming cardiologists. The study showed that although all systems emphasize the need for multidisciplinary care, there were notable differences in the comprehensiveness, cultural appropriateness, and presentation of their responses. GPT-4 (https://chatbotapp.ai) and Gemini (https://gemini.google.com/app) outperformed Bing (https://copilot.microsoft.com), particularly in the balanced and culturally sensitive delivery of information.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CJC Open
CJC Open Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
143
审稿时长
60 days
期刊最新文献
Patent Foramen Ovale Closure for Primary Prevention of Stroke Distal Vessel Diameter and Antegrade Crossing Success in Chronic Total Occlusion Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Chronic Total Occlusion in a Patient with Situs Inversus: Challenges and Technical Considerations Imaging-Guided Plaque Modification Enables Dual-Branch Revascularization in Unprotected Aorto-Ostial Left Main Chronic Total Occlusion Evaluation of a Community-based Quality Improvement Smoking Cessation Program Using the Ottawa Model During COVID-19
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1