Ayiturxun Shamuxi , Bo Han , Xiaobin Jin , Paruke Wusimanjiang , Abudureheman Abudukerimu , Qianli Chen , Hongtao Zhou , Min Gong
{"title":"旱地景观生态风险的空间格局与驱动机制:基于综合地理探测器和机器学习模型的洞察","authors":"Ayiturxun Shamuxi , Bo Han , Xiaobin Jin , Paruke Wusimanjiang , Abudureheman Abudukerimu , Qianli Chen , Hongtao Zhou , Min Gong","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolind.2025.113305","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Drylands are among the most vulnerable and sensitive regions to global climate and land use changes. As one of the largest inland arid river basins, the Tarim River Basin exhibits diverse land use patterns that have exacerbated ecological risks, degraded the environment, and heightened ecosystem vulnerability. This study analyzed the spatiotemporal evolution of landscape ecological risks in the basin from 1990 to 2020 using a landscape ecological risk model. A novel combination of the geographic detector and machine learning was employed to identify the nonlinear driving mechanisms of ecological risk. Key findings include: (1) Unused land dominated the basin, with land use showing “three increases and three decreases” trends: increases in cropland, construction land, and unused land, and decreases in grassland, water bodies, and forested areas. (2) High-risk areas were predominant, increasing by 2.31%, while low- and medium-risk areas declined by 0.60% and 1.49%, respectively. (3) Ecological risks transitioned from dispersed to aggregated patterns, with significant clustering of high- and low-risk zones. (4) Elevation, NDVI, and distance to urban centers were key drivers in single-factor analyses, while dual-factor interactions, particularly involving NDVI, consistently enhanced risk. These findings elucidate the spatiotemporal dynamics of land use and ecological risks, offering insights for ecological management and sustainable development.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11459,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Indicators","volume":"172 ","pages":"Article 113305"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Spatial pattern and driving mechanisms of dryland landscape ecological risk: Insights from an integrated geographic detector and machine learning model\",\"authors\":\"Ayiturxun Shamuxi , Bo Han , Xiaobin Jin , Paruke Wusimanjiang , Abudureheman Abudukerimu , Qianli Chen , Hongtao Zhou , Min Gong\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ecolind.2025.113305\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Drylands are among the most vulnerable and sensitive regions to global climate and land use changes. As one of the largest inland arid river basins, the Tarim River Basin exhibits diverse land use patterns that have exacerbated ecological risks, degraded the environment, and heightened ecosystem vulnerability. This study analyzed the spatiotemporal evolution of landscape ecological risks in the basin from 1990 to 2020 using a landscape ecological risk model. A novel combination of the geographic detector and machine learning was employed to identify the nonlinear driving mechanisms of ecological risk. Key findings include: (1) Unused land dominated the basin, with land use showing “three increases and three decreases” trends: increases in cropland, construction land, and unused land, and decreases in grassland, water bodies, and forested areas. (2) High-risk areas were predominant, increasing by 2.31%, while low- and medium-risk areas declined by 0.60% and 1.49%, respectively. (3) Ecological risks transitioned from dispersed to aggregated patterns, with significant clustering of high- and low-risk zones. (4) Elevation, NDVI, and distance to urban centers were key drivers in single-factor analyses, while dual-factor interactions, particularly involving NDVI, consistently enhanced risk. These findings elucidate the spatiotemporal dynamics of land use and ecological risks, offering insights for ecological management and sustainable development.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11459,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecological Indicators\",\"volume\":\"172 \",\"pages\":\"Article 113305\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecological Indicators\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X25002365\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/3/13 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Indicators","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X25002365","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Spatial pattern and driving mechanisms of dryland landscape ecological risk: Insights from an integrated geographic detector and machine learning model
Drylands are among the most vulnerable and sensitive regions to global climate and land use changes. As one of the largest inland arid river basins, the Tarim River Basin exhibits diverse land use patterns that have exacerbated ecological risks, degraded the environment, and heightened ecosystem vulnerability. This study analyzed the spatiotemporal evolution of landscape ecological risks in the basin from 1990 to 2020 using a landscape ecological risk model. A novel combination of the geographic detector and machine learning was employed to identify the nonlinear driving mechanisms of ecological risk. Key findings include: (1) Unused land dominated the basin, with land use showing “three increases and three decreases” trends: increases in cropland, construction land, and unused land, and decreases in grassland, water bodies, and forested areas. (2) High-risk areas were predominant, increasing by 2.31%, while low- and medium-risk areas declined by 0.60% and 1.49%, respectively. (3) Ecological risks transitioned from dispersed to aggregated patterns, with significant clustering of high- and low-risk zones. (4) Elevation, NDVI, and distance to urban centers were key drivers in single-factor analyses, while dual-factor interactions, particularly involving NDVI, consistently enhanced risk. These findings elucidate the spatiotemporal dynamics of land use and ecological risks, offering insights for ecological management and sustainable development.
期刊介绍:
The ultimate aim of Ecological Indicators is to integrate the monitoring and assessment of ecological and environmental indicators with management practices. The journal provides a forum for the discussion of the applied scientific development and review of traditional indicator approaches as well as for theoretical, modelling and quantitative applications such as index development. Research into the following areas will be published.
• All aspects of ecological and environmental indicators and indices.
• New indicators, and new approaches and methods for indicator development, testing and use.
• Development and modelling of indices, e.g. application of indicator suites across multiple scales and resources.
• Analysis and research of resource, system- and scale-specific indicators.
• Methods for integration of social and other valuation metrics for the production of scientifically rigorous and politically-relevant assessments using indicator-based monitoring and assessment programs.
• How research indicators can be transformed into direct application for management purposes.
• Broader assessment objectives and methods, e.g. biodiversity, biological integrity, and sustainability, through the use of indicators.
• Resource-specific indicators such as landscape, agroecosystems, forests, wetlands, etc.