蒸发冷却器和野火烟雾暴露:炎热干燥地区的气候正义问题。

IF 4.1 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Frontiers in Public Health Pub Date : 2025-02-26 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fpubh.2025.1541053
Gina M Solomon, Nayamin Martinez, Julie Von Behren, Isabella Kaser, David Chang, Aditya Singh, Stephanie Jarmul, Shelly L Miller, Peggy Reynolds, Mohammad Heidarinejad, Brent Stephens, Brett C Singer, Jeff Wagner, John R Balmes
{"title":"蒸发冷却器和野火烟雾暴露:炎热干燥地区的气候正义问题。","authors":"Gina M Solomon, Nayamin Martinez, Julie Von Behren, Isabella Kaser, David Chang, Aditya Singh, Stephanie Jarmul, Shelly L Miller, Peggy Reynolds, Mohammad Heidarinejad, Brent Stephens, Brett C Singer, Jeff Wagner, John R Balmes","doi":"10.3389/fpubh.2025.1541053","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Low-income families in dry regions, including in the Southwestern United States, frequently cool their homes with evaporative (\"swamp\") coolers (ECs). While inexpensive and energy efficient compared to central air conditioners, ECs pull unfiltered outdoor air into the home, creating a health hazard to occupants when wildfire smoke and heat events coincide. A community-engaged research project to reduce wildfire smoke in homes was conducted in California's San Joaquin Valley in homes of Spanish-speaking agricultural workers. A total of 88 study participants with ECs were asked about their level of satisfaction with their EC and their willingness to pay for air filtration. About 47% of participants reported dissatisfaction with their EC, with the most frequently reported reason being that it brings in dust and air pollution. Participants were highly satisfied with air cleaners and air filters that were offered to them free-of-charge. However, a willingness to pay analysis showed that air filtration solutions would not be adopted without significant subsidies; furthermore, air filtration would be an ongoing cost to participants due to the need to regularly replace filters. Short-term filtration solutions for EC users are feasible to implement and may reduce smoke exposure during wildfire events. Such solutions would need to be offered at low-or no-cost to reduce barriers to adoption. Longer term solutions include prioritizing homes with ECs in wildfire smoke exposed regions for replacement with air cooling technologies that provide clean air. Because ECs are disproportionately in low-income homes, addressing smoke intrusion through these devices is an environmental justice issue.</p>","PeriodicalId":12548,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Public Health","volume":"13 ","pages":"1541053"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11897565/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaporative coolers and wildfire smoke exposure: a climate justice issue in hot, dry regions.\",\"authors\":\"Gina M Solomon, Nayamin Martinez, Julie Von Behren, Isabella Kaser, David Chang, Aditya Singh, Stephanie Jarmul, Shelly L Miller, Peggy Reynolds, Mohammad Heidarinejad, Brent Stephens, Brett C Singer, Jeff Wagner, John R Balmes\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fpubh.2025.1541053\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Low-income families in dry regions, including in the Southwestern United States, frequently cool their homes with evaporative (\\\"swamp\\\") coolers (ECs). While inexpensive and energy efficient compared to central air conditioners, ECs pull unfiltered outdoor air into the home, creating a health hazard to occupants when wildfire smoke and heat events coincide. A community-engaged research project to reduce wildfire smoke in homes was conducted in California's San Joaquin Valley in homes of Spanish-speaking agricultural workers. A total of 88 study participants with ECs were asked about their level of satisfaction with their EC and their willingness to pay for air filtration. About 47% of participants reported dissatisfaction with their EC, with the most frequently reported reason being that it brings in dust and air pollution. Participants were highly satisfied with air cleaners and air filters that were offered to them free-of-charge. However, a willingness to pay analysis showed that air filtration solutions would not be adopted without significant subsidies; furthermore, air filtration would be an ongoing cost to participants due to the need to regularly replace filters. Short-term filtration solutions for EC users are feasible to implement and may reduce smoke exposure during wildfire events. Such solutions would need to be offered at low-or no-cost to reduce barriers to adoption. Longer term solutions include prioritizing homes with ECs in wildfire smoke exposed regions for replacement with air cooling technologies that provide clean air. Because ECs are disproportionately in low-income homes, addressing smoke intrusion through these devices is an environmental justice issue.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12548,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Public Health\",\"volume\":\"13 \",\"pages\":\"1541053\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11897565/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Public Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2025.1541053\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2025.1541053","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

包括美国西南部在内的干旱地区的低收入家庭经常使用蒸发式(“沼泽”)冷却器(ECs)为房屋降温。虽然与中央空调相比价格便宜且节能,但ec将未经过滤的室外空气带入家中,当野火烟雾和高温事件同时发生时,会对居住者的健康造成危害。一项社区参与的研究项目旨在减少家庭中的野火烟雾,该项目在加利福尼亚州圣华金河谷的西班牙语农业工人家中进行。共有88名患有空气过滤器的研究参与者被问及他们对空气过滤器的满意度以及他们购买空气过滤器的意愿。约47%的受访者表示对他们的电动汽车不满意,最常见的原因是电动汽车带来了灰尘和空气污染。参与者对免费提供的空气净化器和空气过滤器非常满意。然而,付费意愿分析表明,如果没有大量补贴,空气过滤解决方案将不会被采用;此外,由于需要定期更换过滤器,空气过滤将是参与者的持续成本。短期过滤解决方案对EC用户是可行的,可以减少野火事件期间的烟雾暴露。这些解决方案需要以低成本或无成本的方式提供,以减少采用的障碍。长期的解决方案包括优先考虑在野火烟雾暴露地区安装ECs的家庭,替换为提供清洁空气的空气冷却技术。由于电子设备在低收入家庭中的比例过高,因此解决通过这些设备产生的烟雾入侵问题是一个环境正义问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaporative coolers and wildfire smoke exposure: a climate justice issue in hot, dry regions.

Low-income families in dry regions, including in the Southwestern United States, frequently cool their homes with evaporative ("swamp") coolers (ECs). While inexpensive and energy efficient compared to central air conditioners, ECs pull unfiltered outdoor air into the home, creating a health hazard to occupants when wildfire smoke and heat events coincide. A community-engaged research project to reduce wildfire smoke in homes was conducted in California's San Joaquin Valley in homes of Spanish-speaking agricultural workers. A total of 88 study participants with ECs were asked about their level of satisfaction with their EC and their willingness to pay for air filtration. About 47% of participants reported dissatisfaction with their EC, with the most frequently reported reason being that it brings in dust and air pollution. Participants were highly satisfied with air cleaners and air filters that were offered to them free-of-charge. However, a willingness to pay analysis showed that air filtration solutions would not be adopted without significant subsidies; furthermore, air filtration would be an ongoing cost to participants due to the need to regularly replace filters. Short-term filtration solutions for EC users are feasible to implement and may reduce smoke exposure during wildfire events. Such solutions would need to be offered at low-or no-cost to reduce barriers to adoption. Longer term solutions include prioritizing homes with ECs in wildfire smoke exposed regions for replacement with air cooling technologies that provide clean air. Because ECs are disproportionately in low-income homes, addressing smoke intrusion through these devices is an environmental justice issue.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers in Public Health
Frontiers in Public Health Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
7.70%
发文量
4469
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Public Health is a multidisciplinary open-access journal which publishes rigorously peer-reviewed research and is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians, policy makers and the public worldwide. The journal aims at overcoming current fragmentation in research and publication, promoting consistency in pursuing relevant scientific themes, and supporting finding dissemination and translation into practice. Frontiers in Public Health is organized into Specialty Sections that cover different areas of research in the field. Please refer to the author guidelines for details on article types and the submission process.
期刊最新文献
Association of psychological resilience and social support with subjective coercion experience in hospitalized psychiatric inpatients: a cross-sectional study. Factor structure and psychometric validation of the Work and Well-being Inventory. Exploring the role of racial/ethnic patient-physician concordance in optimizing health and patient outcomes among black populations in the United States: an integrative systematic review. Knowledge level regarding mpox among nurses in China: a cross-sectional study. Healthcare-associated infections in home care settings: a systematic review of prevalence, risk factors, and prevention strategies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1