了解流氓行为有助于了解如何限制全球鸟类捕食者造成的伤害

IF 4.4 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION Biological Conservation Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-14 DOI:10.1016/j.biocon.2025.111091
Catherine J. Price, Annabel Ellis, Peter B. Banks
{"title":"了解流氓行为有助于了解如何限制全球鸟类捕食者造成的伤害","authors":"Catherine J. Price,&nbsp;Annabel Ellis,&nbsp;Peter B. Banks","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2025.111091","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Some individuals within a predator population inflict disproportionate impacts on prey. Managing this ‘rogue’ behaviour is crucial when prey is of conservation concern, but challenging when its prevalence is unknown. We ran a multi-stage experiment to discover the prevalence of ‘rogue’ predatory behaviour within an invasive black rat <em>Rattus rattus</em> population and if exposure to unrewarding prey odour inhibited interest in prey. First, marked rats were exposed to quail eggs to identify ‘rogues’ (individuals that ate eggs on multiple nights). We then tested if rats remained motivated to hunt eggs after approximately 14 days exposure to an unrewarding bird odour. From 85 marked rats, 19 were ‘rogues’ and showed no demographic differences to the rest of the population. However, ‘rogues’ visited the unrewarded odour for more nights and were more likely to hunt eggs after exposure to prey odour. Our results suggest that ‘rogues’ are behaviourally, not demographically, different. Problematic behaviour is likely facilitated by reinforcement and experience. Their interest in unrewarding prey odours suggests ‘rogues’ are highly motivated and attentive to prey cues. Complex spatial and temporal exposure to unrewarded cues (misinformation) may deter interest in prey by ‘rogues’ but remains to be tested.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55375,"journal":{"name":"Biological Conservation","volume":"305 ","pages":"Article 111091"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Understanding rogue behaviour provides insight for limiting damage by a global bird predator\",\"authors\":\"Catherine J. Price,&nbsp;Annabel Ellis,&nbsp;Peter B. Banks\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.biocon.2025.111091\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Some individuals within a predator population inflict disproportionate impacts on prey. Managing this ‘rogue’ behaviour is crucial when prey is of conservation concern, but challenging when its prevalence is unknown. We ran a multi-stage experiment to discover the prevalence of ‘rogue’ predatory behaviour within an invasive black rat <em>Rattus rattus</em> population and if exposure to unrewarding prey odour inhibited interest in prey. First, marked rats were exposed to quail eggs to identify ‘rogues’ (individuals that ate eggs on multiple nights). We then tested if rats remained motivated to hunt eggs after approximately 14 days exposure to an unrewarding bird odour. From 85 marked rats, 19 were ‘rogues’ and showed no demographic differences to the rest of the population. However, ‘rogues’ visited the unrewarded odour for more nights and were more likely to hunt eggs after exposure to prey odour. Our results suggest that ‘rogues’ are behaviourally, not demographically, different. Problematic behaviour is likely facilitated by reinforcement and experience. Their interest in unrewarding prey odours suggests ‘rogues’ are highly motivated and attentive to prey cues. Complex spatial and temporal exposure to unrewarded cues (misinformation) may deter interest in prey by ‘rogues’ but remains to be tested.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55375,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biological Conservation\",\"volume\":\"305 \",\"pages\":\"Article 111091\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biological Conservation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006320725001284\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/3/14 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biological Conservation","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006320725001284","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

捕食者群体中的一些个体会对猎物造成不成比例的影响。当猎物受到保护时,控制这种“流氓”行为是至关重要的,但当它的流行程度未知时,就很有挑战性了。我们进行了一项多阶段的实验,以发现入侵黑鼠Rattus Rattus种群中“流氓”掠食性行为的普遍性,以及暴露于无回报的猎物气味是否会抑制对猎物的兴趣。首先,将被标记的老鼠暴露在鹌鹑蛋中,以识别“流氓”(在多个晚上吃蛋的个体)。然后,我们测试了老鼠在暴露在一种没有回报的鸟气味中大约14天后是否仍然有动力去找蛋。在85只被标记的老鼠中,有19只是“流氓”,与其他老鼠没有人口统计学上的差异。然而,“无赖”在没有奖励的气味中逗留的时间更长,在暴露于猎物气味后更有可能捕食蛋。我们的研究结果表明,“流氓”是行为上的不同,而不是人口上的不同。有问题的行为很可能是由强化和经验促成的。它们对猎物毫无回报的气味感兴趣,这表明“盗贼”对猎物的线索非常关注。复杂的空间和时间暴露于无回报的线索(错误信息)可能会阻止“流氓”对猎物的兴趣,但仍有待测试。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Understanding rogue behaviour provides insight for limiting damage by a global bird predator
Some individuals within a predator population inflict disproportionate impacts on prey. Managing this ‘rogue’ behaviour is crucial when prey is of conservation concern, but challenging when its prevalence is unknown. We ran a multi-stage experiment to discover the prevalence of ‘rogue’ predatory behaviour within an invasive black rat Rattus rattus population and if exposure to unrewarding prey odour inhibited interest in prey. First, marked rats were exposed to quail eggs to identify ‘rogues’ (individuals that ate eggs on multiple nights). We then tested if rats remained motivated to hunt eggs after approximately 14 days exposure to an unrewarding bird odour. From 85 marked rats, 19 were ‘rogues’ and showed no demographic differences to the rest of the population. However, ‘rogues’ visited the unrewarded odour for more nights and were more likely to hunt eggs after exposure to prey odour. Our results suggest that ‘rogues’ are behaviourally, not demographically, different. Problematic behaviour is likely facilitated by reinforcement and experience. Their interest in unrewarding prey odours suggests ‘rogues’ are highly motivated and attentive to prey cues. Complex spatial and temporal exposure to unrewarded cues (misinformation) may deter interest in prey by ‘rogues’ but remains to be tested.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Biological Conservation
Biological Conservation 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
10.20
自引率
3.40%
发文量
295
审稿时长
61 days
期刊介绍: Biological Conservation is an international leading journal in the discipline of conservation biology. The journal publishes articles spanning a diverse range of fields that contribute to the biological, sociological, and economic dimensions of conservation and natural resource management. The primary aim of Biological Conservation is the publication of high-quality papers that advance the science and practice of conservation, or which demonstrate the application of conservation principles for natural resource management and policy. Therefore it will be of interest to a broad international readership.
期刊最新文献
Predicting the occurrence of a protected orchid and other old-growth specialists: A cost-effective approach using open geodata Associations among ecological traits, historical effective population size, genomic diversity, and extinction risk across the avian tree of life A new normal? Population growth rates of a rare alpine plant stabilize after periods of decline, but not enough to allow for full population recovery Male scarcity in sea turtles is obscured by optimistic artefacts and misinterpretations of breeding sex ratios and multiple paternity Broad-scale models of a foundational alpine insect: Implications for grizzly bear ecology and conservation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1