居民教育对发病率和死亡率会议绩效的影响

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES Journal of Surgical Education Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-13 DOI:10.1016/j.jsurg.2025.103485
Brendin R. Beaulieu-Jones MD, MBA, MBI , Spencer Wilson MD , Gordana Rasic MD , Erica A. Brotschi MD , Luise I. Pernar MD, MHPE
{"title":"居民教育对发病率和死亡率会议绩效的影响","authors":"Brendin R. Beaulieu-Jones MD, MBA, MBI ,&nbsp;Spencer Wilson MD ,&nbsp;Gordana Rasic MD ,&nbsp;Erica A. Brotschi MD ,&nbsp;Luise I. Pernar MD, MHPE","doi":"10.1016/j.jsurg.2025.103485","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>INTRODUCTION</h3><div>Surgical morbidity and mortality (M&amp;M) conference is a cornerstone of surgical education and quality improvement. Despite its prominence, there are no widely established guidelines for the completion of M&amp;M, nor training for surgical residents, who are frequently responsible for root cause analysis and case presentation.</div></div><div><h3>METHODS</h3><div>Based on a recently published systematic review and expert focus groups with experienced surgeons, we developed a series of 10 recommendations and/or best practices for surgical M&amp;M conference. A brief educational session was created to share the recommendations and best practices with resident presenters. Trained reviewers assessed the completion of aforementioned best practices before and after the educational session. Chi-square analysis was performed to evaluate changes after the educational initiative.</div></div><div><h3>RESULTS</h3><div>During the pre-education period, 49 M&amp;M presentations were evaluated. Completion of best practice components ranged from 22.5% to 95.9%, with greater than 80% completion of 6 of 10 components. After the educational initiative, 45 additional presentations were evaluated. We observed a statistically significance increase in the number of presentations with a concise case presentation (baseline: 59.2%, posteducation: 88.9%, p = 0.002). Notable increases in completion were observed for 2 other components, although neither reached statistical significance: review of relevant, high-quality literature (baseline: 53.1%, posteducation: 66.7%, p = 0.116) and focused teaching point, with or without reference to literature (baseline: 63.3%, posteducation: 80.0%, p = 0.149). No clinically significant decreases were observed.</div></div><div><h3>DISCUSSION</h3><div>We used a mixed methods approach to design and evaluate an educational session to equip resident presenters with a series of evidence-based best practices for M&amp;M conference. The findings demonstrate the potential positive impact of a brief, educational initiative on aspects of M&amp;M conference at a single institution. The impact was ultimately limited, particularly in regard to scope and effect, which we postulate is due to the fact that the success of M&amp;M conference is dependent on a range of factors. Nonetheless, to advance the effectiveness of M&amp;M conference, we advocate for this initiative and related education for residents, given their principal role, as well as broader initiatives to increase the value of M&amp;M conference.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50033,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surgical Education","volume":"82 5","pages":"Article 103485"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of Resident Education on the Performance of Morbidity and Mortality Conference\",\"authors\":\"Brendin R. Beaulieu-Jones MD, MBA, MBI ,&nbsp;Spencer Wilson MD ,&nbsp;Gordana Rasic MD ,&nbsp;Erica A. Brotschi MD ,&nbsp;Luise I. Pernar MD, MHPE\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jsurg.2025.103485\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>INTRODUCTION</h3><div>Surgical morbidity and mortality (M&amp;M) conference is a cornerstone of surgical education and quality improvement. Despite its prominence, there are no widely established guidelines for the completion of M&amp;M, nor training for surgical residents, who are frequently responsible for root cause analysis and case presentation.</div></div><div><h3>METHODS</h3><div>Based on a recently published systematic review and expert focus groups with experienced surgeons, we developed a series of 10 recommendations and/or best practices for surgical M&amp;M conference. A brief educational session was created to share the recommendations and best practices with resident presenters. Trained reviewers assessed the completion of aforementioned best practices before and after the educational session. Chi-square analysis was performed to evaluate changes after the educational initiative.</div></div><div><h3>RESULTS</h3><div>During the pre-education period, 49 M&amp;M presentations were evaluated. Completion of best practice components ranged from 22.5% to 95.9%, with greater than 80% completion of 6 of 10 components. After the educational initiative, 45 additional presentations were evaluated. We observed a statistically significance increase in the number of presentations with a concise case presentation (baseline: 59.2%, posteducation: 88.9%, p = 0.002). Notable increases in completion were observed for 2 other components, although neither reached statistical significance: review of relevant, high-quality literature (baseline: 53.1%, posteducation: 66.7%, p = 0.116) and focused teaching point, with or without reference to literature (baseline: 63.3%, posteducation: 80.0%, p = 0.149). No clinically significant decreases were observed.</div></div><div><h3>DISCUSSION</h3><div>We used a mixed methods approach to design and evaluate an educational session to equip resident presenters with a series of evidence-based best practices for M&amp;M conference. The findings demonstrate the potential positive impact of a brief, educational initiative on aspects of M&amp;M conference at a single institution. The impact was ultimately limited, particularly in regard to scope and effect, which we postulate is due to the fact that the success of M&amp;M conference is dependent on a range of factors. Nonetheless, to advance the effectiveness of M&amp;M conference, we advocate for this initiative and related education for residents, given their principal role, as well as broader initiatives to increase the value of M&amp;M conference.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50033,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Surgical Education\",\"volume\":\"82 5\",\"pages\":\"Article 103485\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Surgical Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1931720425000662\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/3/13 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Surgical Education","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1931720425000662","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

手术发病率和死亡率(M&;M)会议是外科教育和质量提高的基石。尽管它很突出,但没有广泛建立的指导方针来完成M&;M,也没有培训外科住院医师,他们经常负责根本原因分析和病例介绍。方法基于最近发表的一篇系统综述和与经验丰富的外科医生的专家焦点小组,我们为外科M&;M会议制定了一系列10条建议和/或最佳实践。举办了一个简短的教育会议,与常驻主持人分享建议和最佳实践。训练有素的评审人员在教育课程之前和之后评估上述最佳实践的完成情况。采用卡方分析评价教育活动后的变化。结果在预教育阶段,对49例M&;M报告进行了评估。最佳实践组件的完成率从22.5%到95.9%不等,10个组件中的6个组件完成率超过80%。在教育活动结束后,又对45份报告进行了评估。我们观察到,简明的病例报告数量有统计学意义的增加(基线:59.2%,教育后:88.9%,p = 0.002)。其他2个组成部分的完成率均有显著提高,但均未达到统计学意义:回顾相关的高质量文献(基线:53.1%,后教育:66.7%,p = 0.116)和参考或不参考文献的重点教学点(基线:63.3%,后教育:80.0%,p = 0.149)。临床未观察到明显的下降。讨论:我们采用混合方法来设计和评估一个教育会议,为常驻主持人提供一系列以证据为基础的M&;M会议最佳实践。研究结果表明,一个简短的教育倡议对单一机构的M&;M会议的各个方面具有潜在的积极影响。影响最终是有限的,特别是在范围和效果方面,我们认为这是由于M&;M会议的成功取决于一系列因素。尽管如此,为了提高M&;M会议的有效性,鉴于居民的主要作用,我们提倡这一倡议和对居民的相关教育,以及更广泛的倡议,以增加M&;M会议的价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Impact of Resident Education on the Performance of Morbidity and Mortality Conference

INTRODUCTION

Surgical morbidity and mortality (M&M) conference is a cornerstone of surgical education and quality improvement. Despite its prominence, there are no widely established guidelines for the completion of M&M, nor training for surgical residents, who are frequently responsible for root cause analysis and case presentation.

METHODS

Based on a recently published systematic review and expert focus groups with experienced surgeons, we developed a series of 10 recommendations and/or best practices for surgical M&M conference. A brief educational session was created to share the recommendations and best practices with resident presenters. Trained reviewers assessed the completion of aforementioned best practices before and after the educational session. Chi-square analysis was performed to evaluate changes after the educational initiative.

RESULTS

During the pre-education period, 49 M&M presentations were evaluated. Completion of best practice components ranged from 22.5% to 95.9%, with greater than 80% completion of 6 of 10 components. After the educational initiative, 45 additional presentations were evaluated. We observed a statistically significance increase in the number of presentations with a concise case presentation (baseline: 59.2%, posteducation: 88.9%, p = 0.002). Notable increases in completion were observed for 2 other components, although neither reached statistical significance: review of relevant, high-quality literature (baseline: 53.1%, posteducation: 66.7%, p = 0.116) and focused teaching point, with or without reference to literature (baseline: 63.3%, posteducation: 80.0%, p = 0.149). No clinically significant decreases were observed.

DISCUSSION

We used a mixed methods approach to design and evaluate an educational session to equip resident presenters with a series of evidence-based best practices for M&M conference. The findings demonstrate the potential positive impact of a brief, educational initiative on aspects of M&M conference at a single institution. The impact was ultimately limited, particularly in regard to scope and effect, which we postulate is due to the fact that the success of M&M conference is dependent on a range of factors. Nonetheless, to advance the effectiveness of M&M conference, we advocate for this initiative and related education for residents, given their principal role, as well as broader initiatives to increase the value of M&M conference.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Surgical Education
Journal of Surgical Education EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-SURGERY
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
10.30%
发文量
261
审稿时长
48 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Surgical Education (JSE) is dedicated to advancing the field of surgical education through original research. The journal publishes research articles in all surgical disciplines on topics relative to the education of surgical students, residents, and fellows, as well as practicing surgeons. Our readers look to JSE for timely, innovative research findings from the international surgical education community. As the official journal of the Association of Program Directors in Surgery (APDS), JSE publishes the proceedings of the annual APDS meeting held during Surgery Education Week.
期刊最新文献
Entrustable Professional Activities for Head and Neck Surgery Residents: A Consensus Model Development and Validation of a Rubric for Evaluating Formative Feedback on Non-Technical Skills in General Surgery Residents Using a Modified Delphi Approach Operative Review Conference: A Framework for Surgical Trainee Operative Video Review Centered on Entrustable Professional Activities Ethics Education in Neurosurgery Residency: Program Directors’ Perspectives on Perceived Gaps in the Curriculum What Are the Odds? Utilization of Artificial Intelligence to Predict Success in the Integrated Plastic Surgery Match
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1