全球地下水可持续性:战略和未来途径的重要回顾

IF 6.3 1区 地球科学 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL Journal of Hydrology Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-12 DOI:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2025.133060
Fatemeh Karandish, Sida Liu, Inge de Graaf
{"title":"全球地下水可持续性:战略和未来途径的重要回顾","authors":"Fatemeh Karandish,&nbsp;Sida Liu,&nbsp;Inge de Graaf","doi":"10.1016/j.jhydrol.2025.133060","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Groundwater is essential for sustaining life on Earth, yet it faces critical threats from unsustainable exploitation. Here, we conducted a critical analysis of 386 peer-reviewed sources to examine commonly introduced conservation measures, their feasibility, and potential implications, along with an additional assessment to explore spatial opportunities for sustainable groundwater management. A <em>meta</em>-analysis was also performed to investigate the major driving factors contributing to rebound effects – where increased resource efficiency let to converse effect regarding resource use – and the failures of adopted measures. Delving into the specifics of groundwater governance in the five top-consuming countries, we further identified reinforcing policies to address groundwater overexploitation and proposed necessary revisions to promote sustainability. According to the results, the effectiveness of efforts to improve groundwater productivity significantly depended on water and land scarcity, as well as strict regulatory policies, and didn’t always result in groundwater savings. Rebound effects were more likely under supply-side solutions, with potential overexploitation increases of up to 52% in 50% of cases. Although demand-side solutions reduced overexploitation rates to as low as 3%, they were still ineffective in 69% of cases for aquifer recovery in the absence of strict regulatory policies. In general, groundwater stabilization was achieved in less than 30% of the case studies, mostly when multiple measures were implemented, highlighting that no single solution category can sustainably control aquifer depletion. Addressing economic water scarcity and closing yield gaps had the potential to save groundwater and enhance food security in 25% and 75% of the world, respectively. According to the policy series in top major groundwater-consuming countries, the late initiation of recovery processes, significant conflicts between groundwater protection and national socioeconomic and political policies, predominant state-centered governance, lack of a nexus approach and integrated water management, the oversight of groundwater’s global significance, institutional corruption, and insufficient government commitment to aquifer recovery were among the most common factors reinforcing unsustainable groundwater management.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":362,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hydrology","volume":"657 ","pages":"Article 133060"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Global groundwater sustainability: A critical review of strategies and future pathways\",\"authors\":\"Fatemeh Karandish,&nbsp;Sida Liu,&nbsp;Inge de Graaf\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jhydrol.2025.133060\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Groundwater is essential for sustaining life on Earth, yet it faces critical threats from unsustainable exploitation. Here, we conducted a critical analysis of 386 peer-reviewed sources to examine commonly introduced conservation measures, their feasibility, and potential implications, along with an additional assessment to explore spatial opportunities for sustainable groundwater management. A <em>meta</em>-analysis was also performed to investigate the major driving factors contributing to rebound effects – where increased resource efficiency let to converse effect regarding resource use – and the failures of adopted measures. Delving into the specifics of groundwater governance in the five top-consuming countries, we further identified reinforcing policies to address groundwater overexploitation and proposed necessary revisions to promote sustainability. According to the results, the effectiveness of efforts to improve groundwater productivity significantly depended on water and land scarcity, as well as strict regulatory policies, and didn’t always result in groundwater savings. Rebound effects were more likely under supply-side solutions, with potential overexploitation increases of up to 52% in 50% of cases. Although demand-side solutions reduced overexploitation rates to as low as 3%, they were still ineffective in 69% of cases for aquifer recovery in the absence of strict regulatory policies. In general, groundwater stabilization was achieved in less than 30% of the case studies, mostly when multiple measures were implemented, highlighting that no single solution category can sustainably control aquifer depletion. Addressing economic water scarcity and closing yield gaps had the potential to save groundwater and enhance food security in 25% and 75% of the world, respectively. According to the policy series in top major groundwater-consuming countries, the late initiation of recovery processes, significant conflicts between groundwater protection and national socioeconomic and political policies, predominant state-centered governance, lack of a nexus approach and integrated water management, the oversight of groundwater’s global significance, institutional corruption, and insufficient government commitment to aquifer recovery were among the most common factors reinforcing unsustainable groundwater management.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":362,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Hydrology\",\"volume\":\"657 \",\"pages\":\"Article 133060\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Hydrology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022169425003981\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/3/12 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CIVIL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hydrology","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022169425003981","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

地下水对维持地球上的生命至关重要,但它面临着不可持续开采的严重威胁。在这里,我们对386个同行评审的资源进行了批判性分析,以检查通常引入的保护措施,其可行性和潜在影响,以及探索可持续地下水管理的空间机会的额外评估。我们还进行了一项荟萃分析,以调查导致反弹效应的主要驱动因素,即资源效率的提高会对资源使用产生相反的影响,以及所采取措施的失败。在深入研究五大消费国地下水治理的具体情况后,我们进一步确定了加强解决地下水过度开采的政策,并提出了必要的修订以促进可持续性。结果表明,提高地下水生产力的有效性在很大程度上取决于水资源和土地的稀缺,以及严格的监管政策,并不总是能节约地下水。在供应侧解决方案下,反弹效应更有可能发生,在50%的情况下,潜在的过度开采增加了52%。尽管需求侧解决方案将过度开采率降低至3%,但在缺乏严格监管政策的情况下,这些解决方案在69%的含水层开采案例中仍然无效。总的来说,只有不到30%的案例研究实现了地下水的稳定,大部分是在实施多种措施的情况下实现的,这突出表明,没有单一的解决方案类别可以持续控制含水层的枯竭。解决经济水资源短缺和缩小产量差距有可能分别在世界25%和75%的地区节省地下水并加强粮食安全。根据主要地下水消耗国的政策系列,恢复过程启动较晚,地下水保护与国家社会经济和政治政策之间存在重大冲突,以国家为中心的治理占主导地位,缺乏联系方法和综合水管理,对地下水全球意义的监督,制度腐败,政府对含水层恢复的承诺不足是加强不可持续地下水管理的最常见因素之一。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Global groundwater sustainability: A critical review of strategies and future pathways
Groundwater is essential for sustaining life on Earth, yet it faces critical threats from unsustainable exploitation. Here, we conducted a critical analysis of 386 peer-reviewed sources to examine commonly introduced conservation measures, their feasibility, and potential implications, along with an additional assessment to explore spatial opportunities for sustainable groundwater management. A meta-analysis was also performed to investigate the major driving factors contributing to rebound effects – where increased resource efficiency let to converse effect regarding resource use – and the failures of adopted measures. Delving into the specifics of groundwater governance in the five top-consuming countries, we further identified reinforcing policies to address groundwater overexploitation and proposed necessary revisions to promote sustainability. According to the results, the effectiveness of efforts to improve groundwater productivity significantly depended on water and land scarcity, as well as strict regulatory policies, and didn’t always result in groundwater savings. Rebound effects were more likely under supply-side solutions, with potential overexploitation increases of up to 52% in 50% of cases. Although demand-side solutions reduced overexploitation rates to as low as 3%, they were still ineffective in 69% of cases for aquifer recovery in the absence of strict regulatory policies. In general, groundwater stabilization was achieved in less than 30% of the case studies, mostly when multiple measures were implemented, highlighting that no single solution category can sustainably control aquifer depletion. Addressing economic water scarcity and closing yield gaps had the potential to save groundwater and enhance food security in 25% and 75% of the world, respectively. According to the policy series in top major groundwater-consuming countries, the late initiation of recovery processes, significant conflicts between groundwater protection and national socioeconomic and political policies, predominant state-centered governance, lack of a nexus approach and integrated water management, the oversight of groundwater’s global significance, institutional corruption, and insufficient government commitment to aquifer recovery were among the most common factors reinforcing unsustainable groundwater management.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Hydrology
Journal of Hydrology 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
12.50%
发文量
1309
审稿时长
7.5 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Hydrology publishes original research papers and comprehensive reviews in all the subfields of the hydrological sciences including water based management and policy issues that impact on economics and society. These comprise, but are not limited to the physical, chemical, biogeochemical, stochastic and systems aspects of surface and groundwater hydrology, hydrometeorology and hydrogeology. Relevant topics incorporating the insights and methodologies of disciplines such as climatology, water resource systems, hydraulics, agrohydrology, geomorphology, soil science, instrumentation and remote sensing, civil and environmental engineering are included. Social science perspectives on hydrological problems such as resource and ecological economics, environmental sociology, psychology and behavioural science, management and policy analysis are also invited. Multi-and interdisciplinary analyses of hydrological problems are within scope. The science published in the Journal of Hydrology is relevant to catchment scales rather than exclusively to a local scale or site.
期刊最新文献
Nutrient cycling, biogeochemical pathways and eutrophication status of an urban Himalayan lake system Systematic evaluation of atmospheric forcing, surface datasets, and mesh effects on kilometer-scale land surface and river modeling Scaling relationships between catchment area and peak discharge across the Fitzroy Basin, eastern Australia Combining multiple groundwater hydrograph analyses to characterize aquifer dynamics and drivers in complex hydrogeological settings Temporal scale dictates the dominant driver of lake dynamics on the Tibetan Plateau
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1