IF 1.2 3区 心理学 Q2 LINGUISTICS Journal of Neurolinguistics Pub Date : 2025-03-15 DOI:10.1016/j.jneuroling.2025.101251
Geralyn Schulz , Angela Halpern , Jennifer Speilman , Lorraine Ramig , Ira Panzer , Alan Sharpley , Katherine Freeman
{"title":"Consonant intelligibility in individuals with Parkinson's disease in noise: Pre-specified secondary outcome variables from a randomized control trial (RCT) comparing two intensive speech treatments (LSVT LOUD vs. LSVT ARTIC)","authors":"Geralyn Schulz ,&nbsp;Angela Halpern ,&nbsp;Jennifer Speilman ,&nbsp;Lorraine Ramig ,&nbsp;Ira Panzer ,&nbsp;Alan Sharpley ,&nbsp;Katherine Freeman","doi":"10.1016/j.jneuroling.2025.101251","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The majority of people with Parkinson's disease (PD) experience changes in speech production, most notably reduced vocal volume and imprecise articulation, that limit speech intelligibility and may contribute to significant declines in quality of life. We previously conducted a randomized control trial comparing two intensive treatments, voice (LSVT LOUD) or articulation (LSVT ARTIC) to assess single word intelligibility in the presence of background noise (babble and mall). Participants (64 PD and 20 Healthy) read words from the diagnostic rhyme test (DRT), an ANSI Standard for measuring intelligibility of speech, before and after one month (treatment or no treatment). Teams of trained listeners blindly rated the data. Previously we found that single word intelligibility in the presence of both noise conditions improved in PD participants who had LSVT LOUD compared to the groups that had LSVT ARTIC or no treatment. The current study analyzed the distinctive features (Compactness, Graveness, Sustention, Sibilation, Nasality, Voicing), of the initial consonants of words in the DRT test to determine what in particular is contributing to the differences in word intelligibility that we previously identified. The distinctive features of the DRT assess the valving nature of consonant production. Intensive treatment targeting vocal loudness (LSVT LOUD) had a greater positive effect on consonant intelligibility than treatment targeting articulation (LSVT ARTIC) for all distinctive features in background Babble noise and for 5/6 distinctive features in background Mall noise. Due to the definition of the distinctive features, we can conclude that the intelligibility gains seen following LSVT LOUD treatment are due to improved vocal tract valving.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50118,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neurolinguistics","volume":"75 ","pages":"Article 101251"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neurolinguistics","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0911604425000077","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

大多数帕金森病(PD)患者的言语表达都会发生变化,最明显的是发声量减少和发音不准确,这限制了言语清晰度,并可能导致生活质量显著下降。我们之前进行了一项随机对照试验,比较了语音(LSVT LOUD)或发音(LSVT ARTIC)这两种强化治疗方法,以评估在背景噪声(咿呀声和商场声)存在的情况下单词的可懂度。受试者(64 名聋哑人和 20 名健康人)在一个月前和一个月后(治疗或不治疗)朗读诊断韵律测试(DRT)中的单词,该测试是衡量语言清晰度的 ANSI 标准。由受过训练的听者组成的小组对数据进行盲评。此前我们发现,与接受 LSVT ARTIC 治疗或未接受治疗的群体相比,接受 LSVT LOUD 治疗的帕金森病患者在两种噪音条件下的单词清晰度都有所提高。本研究分析了 DRT 测试中单词首辅音的显著特征(紧凑性、重读性、保持性、混淆性、鼻音、发声),以确定是什么导致了我们之前发现的单词可懂度差异。DRT 测试的显著特点是评估辅音产生的音值性质。针对声音响度的强化治疗(LSVT LOUD)比针对发音的治疗(LSVT ARTIC)对辅音可懂度的积极影响更大,前者适用于背景咿呀噪音中的所有显著特征,后者适用于背景商场噪音中的 5/6 个显著特征。根据对显著特征的定义,我们可以得出结论,LSVT LOUD 治疗后的可懂度提高是由于声带瓣膜的改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Consonant intelligibility in individuals with Parkinson's disease in noise: Pre-specified secondary outcome variables from a randomized control trial (RCT) comparing two intensive speech treatments (LSVT LOUD vs. LSVT ARTIC)
The majority of people with Parkinson's disease (PD) experience changes in speech production, most notably reduced vocal volume and imprecise articulation, that limit speech intelligibility and may contribute to significant declines in quality of life. We previously conducted a randomized control trial comparing two intensive treatments, voice (LSVT LOUD) or articulation (LSVT ARTIC) to assess single word intelligibility in the presence of background noise (babble and mall). Participants (64 PD and 20 Healthy) read words from the diagnostic rhyme test (DRT), an ANSI Standard for measuring intelligibility of speech, before and after one month (treatment or no treatment). Teams of trained listeners blindly rated the data. Previously we found that single word intelligibility in the presence of both noise conditions improved in PD participants who had LSVT LOUD compared to the groups that had LSVT ARTIC or no treatment. The current study analyzed the distinctive features (Compactness, Graveness, Sustention, Sibilation, Nasality, Voicing), of the initial consonants of words in the DRT test to determine what in particular is contributing to the differences in word intelligibility that we previously identified. The distinctive features of the DRT assess the valving nature of consonant production. Intensive treatment targeting vocal loudness (LSVT LOUD) had a greater positive effect on consonant intelligibility than treatment targeting articulation (LSVT ARTIC) for all distinctive features in background Babble noise and for 5/6 distinctive features in background Mall noise. Due to the definition of the distinctive features, we can conclude that the intelligibility gains seen following LSVT LOUD treatment are due to improved vocal tract valving.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Neurolinguistics
Journal of Neurolinguistics 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
5.00%
发文量
49
审稿时长
17.2 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neurolinguistics is an international forum for the integration of the neurosciences and language sciences. JNL provides for rapid publication of novel, peer-reviewed research into the interaction between language, communication and brain processes. The focus is on rigorous studies of an empirical or theoretical nature and which make an original contribution to our knowledge about the involvement of the nervous system in communication and its breakdowns. Contributions from neurology, communication disorders, linguistics, neuropsychology and cognitive science in general are welcome. Published articles will typically address issues relating some aspect of language or speech function to its neurological substrates with clear theoretical import. Interdisciplinary work on any aspect of the biological foundations of language and its disorders resulting from brain damage is encouraged. Studies of normal subjects, with clear reference to brain functions, are appropriate. Group-studies on well defined samples and case studies with well documented lesion or nervous system dysfunction are acceptable. The journal is open to empirical reports and review articles. Special issues on aspects of the relation between language and the structure and function of the nervous system are also welcome.
期刊最新文献
Consonant intelligibility in individuals with Parkinson's disease in noise: Pre-specified secondary outcome variables from a randomized control trial (RCT) comparing two intensive speech treatments (LSVT LOUD vs. LSVT ARTIC) Editorial Board ND250 as a prediction error signal in orthographic processing: Evidence from comparing ERPs to handwritten and printed words tDCS over the left auditory cortex enhances working memory of nonsense auditory syllables: The role of stimulation montages Does sounding ‘Gay’ or ‘Straight’ affect how we understand language? Sentence comprehension is regulated by the speaker's perceived sexual orientation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1