Guangyu Li, Varun Srinivasan, Nicholas B. Tooker, Dongqi Wang, Annalisa Onnis-Hayden, Charles Bott, Paul Dombrowski, Ameet Pinto, April Z. Gu
{"title":"元基因组分析揭示了全规模 EBPR 和 S2EBPR 系统之间的群落级代谢差异","authors":"Guangyu Li, Varun Srinivasan, Nicholas B. Tooker, Dongqi Wang, Annalisa Onnis-Hayden, Charles Bott, Paul Dombrowski, Ameet Pinto, April Z. Gu","doi":"10.1016/j.watres.2025.123509","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Side-Stream Enhanced Biological Phosphorus Removal (S2EBPR) has emerged as a promising technology addressing certain challenges of conventional Enhanced Biological Phosphorus Removal (EBPR), notably stability in phosphorus removal, yet the underlying mechanisms are not fully understood. Metagenomic analysis presents a powerful approach to elucidate community-level metabolic differences between EBPR and S2EBPR configurations. In this study, we compared three EBPR and three S2EBPR activated sludge communities using metagenomic analysis at taxonomy, key functional pathways/genes, and polyphosphate-metabolism marker genes. Our analysis revealed larger genus-level diversity variance in S2EBPR communities, indicating distinct microbial community compositions influenced by different operational configurations. A higher diversity index in the S2EBPR than the EBPR was observed, and a higher <em>Ca.</em> Accumulibacter abundance was detected in EBPRs, whereas the fermentative candidate PAOs genera, including <em>Ca.</em> Phosphoribacter and <em>Ca.</em> Promineifilum, were more abundant in S2EBPR systems. EBPR and S2EBPR groups displayed similar gene and pathway abundance patterns related to core metabolisms essential for carbon and nitrogen metabolism. PolyP-metabolism marker gene phylogeny analysis suggested that exopolyphosphatase gene (<em>ppx</em>) showed better distinctions between EBPR and S2EBPR communities than polyphosphate kinase gene (<em>ppk</em>). This also highlighted the needs in fine-cale microdiversity analysis and finding novel <em>Ca.</em> Accumulibacter clades and species as resolved using the <em>ppk</em> gene. These findings provide valuable insights into AS community dynamics and metabolic functionalities, paving the way for further research into optimizing phosphorus removal processes in wastewater treatment systems.","PeriodicalId":443,"journal":{"name":"Water Research","volume":"183 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Metagenomic Analysis Revealed Community-level Metabolic Differences Between Full-scale EBPR and S2EBPR Systems\",\"authors\":\"Guangyu Li, Varun Srinivasan, Nicholas B. Tooker, Dongqi Wang, Annalisa Onnis-Hayden, Charles Bott, Paul Dombrowski, Ameet Pinto, April Z. Gu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.watres.2025.123509\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Side-Stream Enhanced Biological Phosphorus Removal (S2EBPR) has emerged as a promising technology addressing certain challenges of conventional Enhanced Biological Phosphorus Removal (EBPR), notably stability in phosphorus removal, yet the underlying mechanisms are not fully understood. Metagenomic analysis presents a powerful approach to elucidate community-level metabolic differences between EBPR and S2EBPR configurations. In this study, we compared three EBPR and three S2EBPR activated sludge communities using metagenomic analysis at taxonomy, key functional pathways/genes, and polyphosphate-metabolism marker genes. Our analysis revealed larger genus-level diversity variance in S2EBPR communities, indicating distinct microbial community compositions influenced by different operational configurations. A higher diversity index in the S2EBPR than the EBPR was observed, and a higher <em>Ca.</em> Accumulibacter abundance was detected in EBPRs, whereas the fermentative candidate PAOs genera, including <em>Ca.</em> Phosphoribacter and <em>Ca.</em> Promineifilum, were more abundant in S2EBPR systems. EBPR and S2EBPR groups displayed similar gene and pathway abundance patterns related to core metabolisms essential for carbon and nitrogen metabolism. PolyP-metabolism marker gene phylogeny analysis suggested that exopolyphosphatase gene (<em>ppx</em>) showed better distinctions between EBPR and S2EBPR communities than polyphosphate kinase gene (<em>ppk</em>). This also highlighted the needs in fine-cale microdiversity analysis and finding novel <em>Ca.</em> Accumulibacter clades and species as resolved using the <em>ppk</em> gene. These findings provide valuable insights into AS community dynamics and metabolic functionalities, paving the way for further research into optimizing phosphorus removal processes in wastewater treatment systems.\",\"PeriodicalId\":443,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Water Research\",\"volume\":\"183 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":11.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Water Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2025.123509\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Water Research","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2025.123509","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Metagenomic Analysis Revealed Community-level Metabolic Differences Between Full-scale EBPR and S2EBPR Systems
Side-Stream Enhanced Biological Phosphorus Removal (S2EBPR) has emerged as a promising technology addressing certain challenges of conventional Enhanced Biological Phosphorus Removal (EBPR), notably stability in phosphorus removal, yet the underlying mechanisms are not fully understood. Metagenomic analysis presents a powerful approach to elucidate community-level metabolic differences between EBPR and S2EBPR configurations. In this study, we compared three EBPR and three S2EBPR activated sludge communities using metagenomic analysis at taxonomy, key functional pathways/genes, and polyphosphate-metabolism marker genes. Our analysis revealed larger genus-level diversity variance in S2EBPR communities, indicating distinct microbial community compositions influenced by different operational configurations. A higher diversity index in the S2EBPR than the EBPR was observed, and a higher Ca. Accumulibacter abundance was detected in EBPRs, whereas the fermentative candidate PAOs genera, including Ca. Phosphoribacter and Ca. Promineifilum, were more abundant in S2EBPR systems. EBPR and S2EBPR groups displayed similar gene and pathway abundance patterns related to core metabolisms essential for carbon and nitrogen metabolism. PolyP-metabolism marker gene phylogeny analysis suggested that exopolyphosphatase gene (ppx) showed better distinctions between EBPR and S2EBPR communities than polyphosphate kinase gene (ppk). This also highlighted the needs in fine-cale microdiversity analysis and finding novel Ca. Accumulibacter clades and species as resolved using the ppk gene. These findings provide valuable insights into AS community dynamics and metabolic functionalities, paving the way for further research into optimizing phosphorus removal processes in wastewater treatment systems.
期刊介绍:
Water Research, along with its open access companion journal Water Research X, serves as a platform for publishing original research papers covering various aspects of the science and technology related to the anthropogenic water cycle, water quality, and its management worldwide. The audience targeted by the journal comprises biologists, chemical engineers, chemists, civil engineers, environmental engineers, limnologists, and microbiologists. The scope of the journal include:
•Treatment processes for water and wastewaters (municipal, agricultural, industrial, and on-site treatment), including resource recovery and residuals management;
•Urban hydrology including sewer systems, stormwater management, and green infrastructure;
•Drinking water treatment and distribution;
•Potable and non-potable water reuse;
•Sanitation, public health, and risk assessment;
•Anaerobic digestion, solid and hazardous waste management, including source characterization and the effects and control of leachates and gaseous emissions;
•Contaminants (chemical, microbial, anthropogenic particles such as nanoparticles or microplastics) and related water quality sensing, monitoring, fate, and assessment;
•Anthropogenic impacts on inland, tidal, coastal and urban waters, focusing on surface and ground waters, and point and non-point sources of pollution;
•Environmental restoration, linked to surface water, groundwater and groundwater remediation;
•Analysis of the interfaces between sediments and water, and between water and atmosphere, focusing specifically on anthropogenic impacts;
•Mathematical modelling, systems analysis, machine learning, and beneficial use of big data related to the anthropogenic water cycle;
•Socio-economic, policy, and regulations studies.