全球南北各国对气候政策及其意识形态预测者的公众支持

IF 6.3 2区 经济学 Q1 ECOLOGY Ecological Economics Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-18 DOI:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2025.108603
Christian Bretter , Felix Schulz
{"title":"全球南北各国对气候政策及其意识形态预测者的公众支持","authors":"Christian Bretter ,&nbsp;Felix Schulz","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2025.108603","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Our understanding of public support for climate policies predominantly stems from studies in the Global North and a focus on isolated policy types. Here, we examine how public support for four different climate policy types and the effect of ideological explanatory variables on such support vary among countries of the Global North and Global South. We surveyed representative samples of each three Global Northern countries (Germany, UK, USA) and Global Southern countries (Brazil, China and South Africa) – among those the highest emitters on their respective continents, contributing to 49.3 % of global carbon emissions – resulting in a total sample of N = 11,964 individuals. While we found significant variations among countries, our results showed that public support across all policy types was stronger in the three Global Southern countries, compared to that of the three Global Northern countries. We also found that a positive association of trust in public institutions and a negative association of individualistic worldviews with policy support were stronger in Global Northern countries, compared to Global Southern countries, regardless of policy type. These findings suggest that ideologies play a more important role for policy support in the Global Northern countries, compared to the Global Southern countries.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51021,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Economics","volume":"233 ","pages":"Article 108603"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Public support for climate policies and its ideological predictors across countries of the Global North and Global South\",\"authors\":\"Christian Bretter ,&nbsp;Felix Schulz\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2025.108603\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Our understanding of public support for climate policies predominantly stems from studies in the Global North and a focus on isolated policy types. Here, we examine how public support for four different climate policy types and the effect of ideological explanatory variables on such support vary among countries of the Global North and Global South. We surveyed representative samples of each three Global Northern countries (Germany, UK, USA) and Global Southern countries (Brazil, China and South Africa) – among those the highest emitters on their respective continents, contributing to 49.3 % of global carbon emissions – resulting in a total sample of N = 11,964 individuals. While we found significant variations among countries, our results showed that public support across all policy types was stronger in the three Global Southern countries, compared to that of the three Global Northern countries. We also found that a positive association of trust in public institutions and a negative association of individualistic worldviews with policy support were stronger in Global Northern countries, compared to Global Southern countries, regardless of policy type. These findings suggest that ideologies play a more important role for policy support in the Global Northern countries, compared to the Global Southern countries.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51021,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecological Economics\",\"volume\":\"233 \",\"pages\":\"Article 108603\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecological Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921800925000862\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/3/18 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921800925000862","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们对公众支持气候政策的理解主要源于对全球北方的研究和对孤立政策类型的关注。在这里,我们研究了全球北方和全球南方国家对四种不同气候政策类型的公众支持以及意识形态解释变量对这种支持的影响。我们调查了三个全球北方国家(德国、英国、美国)和全球南方国家(巴西、中国和南非)的代表性样本,这三个国家是各自大陆上碳排放量最高的国家,占全球碳排放量的49.3%,总共有N = 11964个人。虽然我们发现各国之间存在显著差异,但我们的结果表明,与三个全球北方国家相比,三个全球南方国家对所有政策类型的公众支持都更强。我们还发现,无论政策类型如何,与政策支持相比,全球北方国家对公共机构的信任和个人主义世界观与政策支持的负相关关系更强。这些发现表明,与全球南方国家相比,意识形态在全球北方国家的政策支持中起着更重要的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Public support for climate policies and its ideological predictors across countries of the Global North and Global South
Our understanding of public support for climate policies predominantly stems from studies in the Global North and a focus on isolated policy types. Here, we examine how public support for four different climate policy types and the effect of ideological explanatory variables on such support vary among countries of the Global North and Global South. We surveyed representative samples of each three Global Northern countries (Germany, UK, USA) and Global Southern countries (Brazil, China and South Africa) – among those the highest emitters on their respective continents, contributing to 49.3 % of global carbon emissions – resulting in a total sample of N = 11,964 individuals. While we found significant variations among countries, our results showed that public support across all policy types was stronger in the three Global Southern countries, compared to that of the three Global Northern countries. We also found that a positive association of trust in public institutions and a negative association of individualistic worldviews with policy support were stronger in Global Northern countries, compared to Global Southern countries, regardless of policy type. These findings suggest that ideologies play a more important role for policy support in the Global Northern countries, compared to the Global Southern countries.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ecological Economics
Ecological Economics 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
12.00
自引率
5.70%
发文量
313
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Ecological Economics is concerned with extending and integrating the understanding of the interfaces and interplay between "nature''s household" (ecosystems) and "humanity''s household" (the economy). Ecological economics is an interdisciplinary field defined by a set of concrete problems or challenges related to governing economic activity in a way that promotes human well-being, sustainability, and justice. The journal thus emphasizes critical work that draws on and integrates elements of ecological science, economics, and the analysis of values, behaviors, cultural practices, institutional structures, and societal dynamics. The journal is transdisciplinary in spirit and methodologically open, drawing on the insights offered by a variety of intellectual traditions, and appealing to a diverse readership. Specific research areas covered include: valuation of natural resources, sustainable agriculture and development, ecologically integrated technology, integrated ecologic-economic modelling at scales from local to regional to global, implications of thermodynamics for economics and ecology, renewable resource management and conservation, critical assessments of the basic assumptions underlying current economic and ecological paradigms and the implications of alternative assumptions, economic and ecological consequences of genetically engineered organisms, and gene pool inventory and management, alternative principles for valuing natural wealth, integrating natural resources and environmental services into national income and wealth accounts, methods of implementing efficient environmental policies, case studies of economic-ecologic conflict or harmony, etc. New issues in this area are rapidly emerging and will find a ready forum in Ecological Economics.
期刊最新文献
Towards a typology of residential energy consumers: Social context and awareness as predictors of energy-efficient household behaviors in the United States The supply of forest-based CO2 removal Open veins: Drain from Latin America through ecologically unequal exchange Rethinking the use of the residual value method for ecosystem services valuation Climate input-output amplification: Assessing the impact of physical risks on global supply chains
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1