使用新型混合SVR-IWOA和机器学习模型增强了锋利边缘宽度收缩的流量系数预测

IF 6.3 1区 地球科学 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL Journal of Hydrology Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-15 DOI:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2025.133103
Ehsan Afaridegan , Reza Fatahi-Alkouhi , Paymaneh Azarm , Nosratollah Amanian
{"title":"使用新型混合SVR-IWOA和机器学习模型增强了锋利边缘宽度收缩的流量系数预测","authors":"Ehsan Afaridegan ,&nbsp;Reza Fatahi-Alkouhi ,&nbsp;Paymaneh Azarm ,&nbsp;Nosratollah Amanian","doi":"10.1016/j.jhydrol.2025.133103","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Sharp-Edged Width Constrictions (SEWC) are hydraulic structures designed to measure flow in open channels. Accurate prediction of the discharge coefficient (<em>C<sub>d</sub></em>) in SEWC is crucial for determining water discharge in these channels. This information plays a key role in effective water resource management, supporting decision-making regarding the allocation and conservation of water for agricultural, industrial, and municipal purposes. This study introduces a novel hybrid machine learning model, combining Support Vector Regression (SVR) with the Improved Whale Optimization Algorithm (IWOA). Additionally, advanced machine learning models such as NGBoost, AutoInt, and TabNet were employed to predict <em>C<sub>d</sub></em> in SEWC. The SVR-IWOA model offers automatic hyperparameter tuning, significantly enhancing prediction accuracy in complex flow conditions. To develop these models, a dataset consisting of 156 laboratory data points from SEWC experiments was utilized, with 75 % of the data allocated for training and 25 % for testing. The Isolation Forest (IF) algorithm was applied to detect and remove outliers, leading to the exclusion of 5.1 % of the original dataset. Dimensional analysis identified critical factors influencing <em>C<sub>d</sub></em>, including the ratio of upstream depth to opening width (<em>h</em>/<em>b</em>) and the constriction ratio (<em>β</em> = <em>b</em>/<em>B</em>, where <em>B</em> is the channel width). The validity of these dimensionless parameters was confirmed using ANOVA and SHAP analyses, which highlighted <em>β</em> as the most influential factor affecting <em>C<sub>d</sub></em>. Model performance was rigorously evaluated using multiple metrics, including the coefficient of determination (<em>R</em><sup>2</sup>), Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE), Scatter Index (SI), Weighted Mean Absolute Percentage Error (WMAPE), and symmetric Mean Absolute Percentage Error (sMAPE). Comparative evaluations were conducted using Taylor Diagrams, Residual Error Curves (REC), and the Performance Index (PI). In the training stage, NGBoost demonstrated superior performance with a PI of 4994 and a normalized Root Mean Squared Error (<em>E′</em>) of 0.00021, followed by SVR-IWOA with a PI of 2490 and <em>E′</em> of 0.00035. During the testing stage, the SVR-IWOA model maintained strong performance, achieving a PI of 1986 and a low <em>E′</em> of 0.00046, while TabNet closely followed with a PI of 1986 and <em>E′</em> of 0.00047. In terms of <em>R</em><sup>2</sup> values, the models ranked as follows during testing: SVR-IWOA and TabNet tied for first with <em>R</em><sup>2</sup> = 0.993, followed by NGBoost (<em>R</em><sup>2</sup> = 0.992) and AutoInt (<em>R</em><sup>2</sup> = 0.973). These findings highlight the effectiveness of the proposed SVR-IWOA model in accurately predicting <em>C<sub>d</sub></em> and its strong generalization capabilities, positioning it as a robust tool for hydraulic applications.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":362,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hydrology","volume":"657 ","pages":"Article 133103"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Enhanced prediction of discharge coefficient in sharp-edged width constrictions using a novel hybrid SVR-IWOA and machine learning models\",\"authors\":\"Ehsan Afaridegan ,&nbsp;Reza Fatahi-Alkouhi ,&nbsp;Paymaneh Azarm ,&nbsp;Nosratollah Amanian\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jhydrol.2025.133103\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Sharp-Edged Width Constrictions (SEWC) are hydraulic structures designed to measure flow in open channels. Accurate prediction of the discharge coefficient (<em>C<sub>d</sub></em>) in SEWC is crucial for determining water discharge in these channels. This information plays a key role in effective water resource management, supporting decision-making regarding the allocation and conservation of water for agricultural, industrial, and municipal purposes. This study introduces a novel hybrid machine learning model, combining Support Vector Regression (SVR) with the Improved Whale Optimization Algorithm (IWOA). Additionally, advanced machine learning models such as NGBoost, AutoInt, and TabNet were employed to predict <em>C<sub>d</sub></em> in SEWC. The SVR-IWOA model offers automatic hyperparameter tuning, significantly enhancing prediction accuracy in complex flow conditions. To develop these models, a dataset consisting of 156 laboratory data points from SEWC experiments was utilized, with 75 % of the data allocated for training and 25 % for testing. The Isolation Forest (IF) algorithm was applied to detect and remove outliers, leading to the exclusion of 5.1 % of the original dataset. Dimensional analysis identified critical factors influencing <em>C<sub>d</sub></em>, including the ratio of upstream depth to opening width (<em>h</em>/<em>b</em>) and the constriction ratio (<em>β</em> = <em>b</em>/<em>B</em>, where <em>B</em> is the channel width). The validity of these dimensionless parameters was confirmed using ANOVA and SHAP analyses, which highlighted <em>β</em> as the most influential factor affecting <em>C<sub>d</sub></em>. Model performance was rigorously evaluated using multiple metrics, including the coefficient of determination (<em>R</em><sup>2</sup>), Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE), Scatter Index (SI), Weighted Mean Absolute Percentage Error (WMAPE), and symmetric Mean Absolute Percentage Error (sMAPE). Comparative evaluations were conducted using Taylor Diagrams, Residual Error Curves (REC), and the Performance Index (PI). In the training stage, NGBoost demonstrated superior performance with a PI of 4994 and a normalized Root Mean Squared Error (<em>E′</em>) of 0.00021, followed by SVR-IWOA with a PI of 2490 and <em>E′</em> of 0.00035. During the testing stage, the SVR-IWOA model maintained strong performance, achieving a PI of 1986 and a low <em>E′</em> of 0.00046, while TabNet closely followed with a PI of 1986 and <em>E′</em> of 0.00047. In terms of <em>R</em><sup>2</sup> values, the models ranked as follows during testing: SVR-IWOA and TabNet tied for first with <em>R</em><sup>2</sup> = 0.993, followed by NGBoost (<em>R</em><sup>2</sup> = 0.992) and AutoInt (<em>R</em><sup>2</sup> = 0.973). These findings highlight the effectiveness of the proposed SVR-IWOA model in accurately predicting <em>C<sub>d</sub></em> and its strong generalization capabilities, positioning it as a robust tool for hydraulic applications.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":362,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Hydrology\",\"volume\":\"657 \",\"pages\":\"Article 133103\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Hydrology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S002216942500441X\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/3/15 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CIVIL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hydrology","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S002216942500441X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

锐边宽度约束(SEWC)是设计用于测量明渠流量的水工结构。SEWC流量系数(Cd)的准确预测对于确定SEWC河道的径流量至关重要。这些信息在有效的水资源管理中起着关键作用,支持有关农业、工业和市政用水分配和保护的决策。本文提出了一种新的混合机器学习模型,将支持向量回归(SVR)与改进的鲸鱼优化算法(IWOA)相结合。此外,采用NGBoost、AutoInt和TabNet等先进的机器学习模型来预测SEWC中的Cd。SVR-IWOA模型提供了自动超参数调谐,显著提高了复杂流动条件下的预测精度。为了开发这些模型,使用了一个由来自SEWC实验的156个实验室数据点组成的数据集,其中75%的数据用于训练,25%用于测试。隔离森林(IF)算法用于检测和去除异常值,导致原始数据集的5.1%被排除在外。量纲分析确定了影响Cd的关键因素,包括上游深度与开口宽度之比(h/b)和收缩比(β = b/ b,其中b为通道宽度)。利用方差分析和SHAP分析证实了这些无量纲参数的有效性,结果表明β是影响Cd的最重要因素。模型性能采用多种指标进行严格评估,包括决定系数(R2)、均方根误差(RMSE)、散点指数(SI)、加权平均绝对百分比误差(WMAPE)和对称平均绝对百分比误差(sMAPE)。采用泰勒图(Taylor diagram)、残差曲线(Residual Error Curves, REC)和性能指数(Performance Index, PI)进行比较评价。在训练阶段,NGBoost表现优异,PI为4994,归一化均方根误差(E′)为0.00021,其次是SVR-IWOA, PI为2490,E′为0.00035。在测试阶段,SVR-IWOA模型保持了较强的性能,实现了1986年的PI和0.00046的低E′,而TabNet紧随其后,PI为1986年,E′为0.00047。在测试过程中,各模型的R2值排序为:SVR-IWOA和TabNet并列第一,R2 = 0.993,其次是NGBoost (R2 = 0.992)和AutoInt (R2 = 0.973)。这些发现突出了所提出的SVR-IWOA模型在准确预测Cd方面的有效性及其强大的泛化能力,使其成为水力应用的强大工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Enhanced prediction of discharge coefficient in sharp-edged width constrictions using a novel hybrid SVR-IWOA and machine learning models
Sharp-Edged Width Constrictions (SEWC) are hydraulic structures designed to measure flow in open channels. Accurate prediction of the discharge coefficient (Cd) in SEWC is crucial for determining water discharge in these channels. This information plays a key role in effective water resource management, supporting decision-making regarding the allocation and conservation of water for agricultural, industrial, and municipal purposes. This study introduces a novel hybrid machine learning model, combining Support Vector Regression (SVR) with the Improved Whale Optimization Algorithm (IWOA). Additionally, advanced machine learning models such as NGBoost, AutoInt, and TabNet were employed to predict Cd in SEWC. The SVR-IWOA model offers automatic hyperparameter tuning, significantly enhancing prediction accuracy in complex flow conditions. To develop these models, a dataset consisting of 156 laboratory data points from SEWC experiments was utilized, with 75 % of the data allocated for training and 25 % for testing. The Isolation Forest (IF) algorithm was applied to detect and remove outliers, leading to the exclusion of 5.1 % of the original dataset. Dimensional analysis identified critical factors influencing Cd, including the ratio of upstream depth to opening width (h/b) and the constriction ratio (β = b/B, where B is the channel width). The validity of these dimensionless parameters was confirmed using ANOVA and SHAP analyses, which highlighted β as the most influential factor affecting Cd. Model performance was rigorously evaluated using multiple metrics, including the coefficient of determination (R2), Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE), Scatter Index (SI), Weighted Mean Absolute Percentage Error (WMAPE), and symmetric Mean Absolute Percentage Error (sMAPE). Comparative evaluations were conducted using Taylor Diagrams, Residual Error Curves (REC), and the Performance Index (PI). In the training stage, NGBoost demonstrated superior performance with a PI of 4994 and a normalized Root Mean Squared Error (E′) of 0.00021, followed by SVR-IWOA with a PI of 2490 and E′ of 0.00035. During the testing stage, the SVR-IWOA model maintained strong performance, achieving a PI of 1986 and a low E′ of 0.00046, while TabNet closely followed with a PI of 1986 and E′ of 0.00047. In terms of R2 values, the models ranked as follows during testing: SVR-IWOA and TabNet tied for first with R2 = 0.993, followed by NGBoost (R2 = 0.992) and AutoInt (R2 = 0.973). These findings highlight the effectiveness of the proposed SVR-IWOA model in accurately predicting Cd and its strong generalization capabilities, positioning it as a robust tool for hydraulic applications.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Hydrology
Journal of Hydrology 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
12.50%
发文量
1309
审稿时长
7.5 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Hydrology publishes original research papers and comprehensive reviews in all the subfields of the hydrological sciences including water based management and policy issues that impact on economics and society. These comprise, but are not limited to the physical, chemical, biogeochemical, stochastic and systems aspects of surface and groundwater hydrology, hydrometeorology and hydrogeology. Relevant topics incorporating the insights and methodologies of disciplines such as climatology, water resource systems, hydraulics, agrohydrology, geomorphology, soil science, instrumentation and remote sensing, civil and environmental engineering are included. Social science perspectives on hydrological problems such as resource and ecological economics, environmental sociology, psychology and behavioural science, management and policy analysis are also invited. Multi-and interdisciplinary analyses of hydrological problems are within scope. The science published in the Journal of Hydrology is relevant to catchment scales rather than exclusively to a local scale or site.
期刊最新文献
Nutrient cycling, biogeochemical pathways and eutrophication status of an urban Himalayan lake system Systematic evaluation of atmospheric forcing, surface datasets, and mesh effects on kilometer-scale land surface and river modeling Scaling relationships between catchment area and peak discharge across the Fitzroy Basin, eastern Australia Combining multiple groundwater hydrograph analyses to characterize aquifer dynamics and drivers in complex hydrogeological settings Temporal scale dictates the dominant driver of lake dynamics on the Tibetan Plateau
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1