Xin Wang, Chaoqian Jiang, Lipeng Liu, Xia Chen, Yuanyuan Ren, Yang Wan, Aoli Zhang, Xiaoyan Zhang, Yue Shang, Yao Zou, Xiaojuan Chen, Fang Liu, Wenyu Yang, Xiaofan Zhu, Ye Guo
{"title":"Efficacy and safety of primary letermovir prophylaxis for cytomegalovirus infection in paediatric patients undergoing allogeneic transplantation: a single-centre, retrospective, real-world analysis.","authors":"Xin Wang, Chaoqian Jiang, Lipeng Liu, Xia Chen, Yuanyuan Ren, Yang Wan, Aoli Zhang, Xiaoyan Zhang, Yue Shang, Yao Zou, Xiaojuan Chen, Fang Liu, Wenyu Yang, Xiaofan Zhu, Ye Guo","doi":"10.46989/001c.131683","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is a common and life-threatening complication following allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). Letermovir (LET) has been the standard prophylaxis for adult recipients, but studies in children remain limited.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed children with or without LET prophylaxis after haploidentical donor (HID) for the Beijing protocol or unrelated cord blood (UCB) transplantation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 151 patients, 67 received LET, including 35 HID recipients and 32 UCB recipients. During the 180 days after transplantation, we found that the LET group had a lower incidence of clinically significant CMV infection (csCMVi) than the non-LET group (13.4% vs. 56.0%, P<0.001). In the LET group, later LET administration was identified as a risk factor for the occurrence of csCMVi (HR: 1.07, 95% CI: 1.01 - 1.14, P=0.029). Further, the HID subgroup had a lower incidence of csCMVi during follow-up than the UCB subgroup (2.9% vs. 25.0%, P=0.009). In terms of safety, the incidence and severity of adverse events, overall survival, cumulative incidence of relapse, relapse free survival, nonrelapse mortality and graft versus host disease-free, relapse-free survival were similar between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>LET is effective and safe in preventing csCMVi among Chinese children undergoing allo-HSCT. Compared to UCB recipients, children undergoing HID transplantation for the Beijing protocol develop less scCMVi up to 180 days post-HSCT.</p>","PeriodicalId":93942,"journal":{"name":"Clinical hematology international","volume":"7 1","pages":"36-46"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11910970/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical hematology international","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46989/001c.131683","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
Efficacy and safety of primary letermovir prophylaxis for cytomegalovirus infection in paediatric patients undergoing allogeneic transplantation: a single-centre, retrospective, real-world analysis.
Background: Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is a common and life-threatening complication following allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). Letermovir (LET) has been the standard prophylaxis for adult recipients, but studies in children remain limited.
Methods: We retrospectively analyzed children with or without LET prophylaxis after haploidentical donor (HID) for the Beijing protocol or unrelated cord blood (UCB) transplantation.
Results: Of the 151 patients, 67 received LET, including 35 HID recipients and 32 UCB recipients. During the 180 days after transplantation, we found that the LET group had a lower incidence of clinically significant CMV infection (csCMVi) than the non-LET group (13.4% vs. 56.0%, P<0.001). In the LET group, later LET administration was identified as a risk factor for the occurrence of csCMVi (HR: 1.07, 95% CI: 1.01 - 1.14, P=0.029). Further, the HID subgroup had a lower incidence of csCMVi during follow-up than the UCB subgroup (2.9% vs. 25.0%, P=0.009). In terms of safety, the incidence and severity of adverse events, overall survival, cumulative incidence of relapse, relapse free survival, nonrelapse mortality and graft versus host disease-free, relapse-free survival were similar between the two groups.
Conclusion: LET is effective and safe in preventing csCMVi among Chinese children undergoing allo-HSCT. Compared to UCB recipients, children undergoing HID transplantation for the Beijing protocol develop less scCMVi up to 180 days post-HSCT.