[单核细胞与高密度脂蛋白胆固醇比值在评估心力衰竭伴射血分数降低患者中的预后价值]。

Y J Wei, Z Hou, Y T Liu, M W Wang, X Y Wang, Y N Ye, K G Jia
{"title":"[单核细胞与高密度脂蛋白胆固醇比值在评估心力衰竭伴射血分数降低患者中的预后价值]。","authors":"Y J Wei, Z Hou, Y T Liu, M W Wang, X Y Wang, Y N Ye, K G Jia","doi":"10.3760/cma.j.cn112150-20240912-00733","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> To explore the prognostic value of monocyte to high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) ratio (MHR) in assessing patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). <b>Methods:</b> Patients with HFrEF (LVEF<40%) admitted to the TEDA International Cardiovascular Disease Hospital between 2 January 2019 and 15 January 2023 were selected. The MHR levels were recorded at admission in patients with HFrEF who were followed up regularly for 12 months. The major adverse cardiovascular events (cardiac death and readmission for heart failure) were defined as poor prognosis. Multivariate Cox regression was used to analyze factors associated with poor prognosis. The receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves were used to assess the diagnostic value of MHR for poor prognosis. The DeLong test was used to analyze whether there was a difference in the effectiveness of MHR and BNP for detecting poor prognosis. The critical value grouping for poor prognosis was evaluated by MHR, and survival analyses were performed using Kaplan-Meier. <b>Results:</b> A total of 286 subjects were enrolled in the study, including 206 males and 80 females, with a median age (<i>Q</i><sub>1</sub>, <i>Q</i><sub>3</sub>) of 67 (58, 74) years. Multivariate Cox regression showed that MHR (<i>HR</i>=1.482, 95%<i>CI</i>:1.015-2.164) and BNP (<i>HR</i>=1.001, 95%<i>CI</i>:1.000-1.001) were associated with poor prognosis in patients with HFrEF. The area under the ROC curve for the adjunctive diagnostic value of MHR, BNP and the combination of both for poor prognosis in patients with HFrEF was 0.709, 0.738 and 0.769, respectively. The critical values were 0.486, 1 090 pg/ml and 0.41, respectively. The DeLong test showed no differences in the validity of MHR, BNP and their combination for detecting poor prognosis. Kaplan Meier survival analysis of 12-month follow-up showed that the time for poor prognosis in HFrEF patients with MHR>0.486 group (8.645 months) was significantly shorter than that in MHR≤0.486 group (10.296 months, <i>P</i><0.001), and the risk of poor prognosis in MHR>0.486 group was 2.843 times higher than that in MHR≤0.486 group (<i>HR</i>=2.843, 95%<i>CI</i>:1.867-4.327). <b>Conclusion:</b> MHR can be an indicator of poor prognosis in patients with HFrEF.</p>","PeriodicalId":24033,"journal":{"name":"中华预防医学杂志","volume":"59 3","pages":"309-316"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Prognostic value of monocyte to high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio in assessing patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction].\",\"authors\":\"Y J Wei, Z Hou, Y T Liu, M W Wang, X Y Wang, Y N Ye, K G Jia\",\"doi\":\"10.3760/cma.j.cn112150-20240912-00733\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> To explore the prognostic value of monocyte to high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) ratio (MHR) in assessing patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). <b>Methods:</b> Patients with HFrEF (LVEF<40%) admitted to the TEDA International Cardiovascular Disease Hospital between 2 January 2019 and 15 January 2023 were selected. The MHR levels were recorded at admission in patients with HFrEF who were followed up regularly for 12 months. The major adverse cardiovascular events (cardiac death and readmission for heart failure) were defined as poor prognosis. Multivariate Cox regression was used to analyze factors associated with poor prognosis. The receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves were used to assess the diagnostic value of MHR for poor prognosis. The DeLong test was used to analyze whether there was a difference in the effectiveness of MHR and BNP for detecting poor prognosis. The critical value grouping for poor prognosis was evaluated by MHR, and survival analyses were performed using Kaplan-Meier. <b>Results:</b> A total of 286 subjects were enrolled in the study, including 206 males and 80 females, with a median age (<i>Q</i><sub>1</sub>, <i>Q</i><sub>3</sub>) of 67 (58, 74) years. Multivariate Cox regression showed that MHR (<i>HR</i>=1.482, 95%<i>CI</i>:1.015-2.164) and BNP (<i>HR</i>=1.001, 95%<i>CI</i>:1.000-1.001) were associated with poor prognosis in patients with HFrEF. The area under the ROC curve for the adjunctive diagnostic value of MHR, BNP and the combination of both for poor prognosis in patients with HFrEF was 0.709, 0.738 and 0.769, respectively. The critical values were 0.486, 1 090 pg/ml and 0.41, respectively. The DeLong test showed no differences in the validity of MHR, BNP and their combination for detecting poor prognosis. Kaplan Meier survival analysis of 12-month follow-up showed that the time for poor prognosis in HFrEF patients with MHR>0.486 group (8.645 months) was significantly shorter than that in MHR≤0.486 group (10.296 months, <i>P</i><0.001), and the risk of poor prognosis in MHR>0.486 group was 2.843 times higher than that in MHR≤0.486 group (<i>HR</i>=2.843, 95%<i>CI</i>:1.867-4.327). <b>Conclusion:</b> MHR can be an indicator of poor prognosis in patients with HFrEF.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":24033,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"中华预防医学杂志\",\"volume\":\"59 3\",\"pages\":\"309-316\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"中华预防医学杂志\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn112150-20240912-00733\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华预防医学杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn112150-20240912-00733","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨单核细胞与高密度脂蛋白胆固醇(HDL-C)比值(MHR)在评估心力衰竭伴射血分数降低(HFrEF)患者预后中的价值。方法:HFrEF患者(lvef)结果:共纳入286例受试者,其中男性206例,女性80例,中位年龄(Q1, Q3)为67(58,74)岁。多因素Cox回归分析显示,MHR (HR=1.482, 95%CI:1.015 ~ 2.164)和BNP (HR=1.001, 95%CI:1.000 ~ 1.001)与HFrEF患者预后不良相关。MHR、BNP及两者联合对HFrEF患者不良预后的辅助诊断价值的ROC曲线下面积分别为0.709、0.738和0.769。临界值分别为0.486、1 090 pg/ml和0.41。DeLong试验显示MHR、BNP及其联合检测不良预后的有效性无差异。Kaplan Meier随访12个月生存分析显示,MHR≤0.486组HFrEF患者出现不良预后的时间(8.645个月)明显短于MHR≤0.486组(10.296个月,P0.486组是MHR≤0.486组的2.843倍(HR=2.843, 95%CI:1.867 ~ 4.327)。结论:MHR可作为HFrEF患者预后不良的一个指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[Prognostic value of monocyte to high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio in assessing patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction].

Objective: To explore the prognostic value of monocyte to high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) ratio (MHR) in assessing patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Methods: Patients with HFrEF (LVEF<40%) admitted to the TEDA International Cardiovascular Disease Hospital between 2 January 2019 and 15 January 2023 were selected. The MHR levels were recorded at admission in patients with HFrEF who were followed up regularly for 12 months. The major adverse cardiovascular events (cardiac death and readmission for heart failure) were defined as poor prognosis. Multivariate Cox regression was used to analyze factors associated with poor prognosis. The receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves were used to assess the diagnostic value of MHR for poor prognosis. The DeLong test was used to analyze whether there was a difference in the effectiveness of MHR and BNP for detecting poor prognosis. The critical value grouping for poor prognosis was evaluated by MHR, and survival analyses were performed using Kaplan-Meier. Results: A total of 286 subjects were enrolled in the study, including 206 males and 80 females, with a median age (Q1, Q3) of 67 (58, 74) years. Multivariate Cox regression showed that MHR (HR=1.482, 95%CI:1.015-2.164) and BNP (HR=1.001, 95%CI:1.000-1.001) were associated with poor prognosis in patients with HFrEF. The area under the ROC curve for the adjunctive diagnostic value of MHR, BNP and the combination of both for poor prognosis in patients with HFrEF was 0.709, 0.738 and 0.769, respectively. The critical values were 0.486, 1 090 pg/ml and 0.41, respectively. The DeLong test showed no differences in the validity of MHR, BNP and their combination for detecting poor prognosis. Kaplan Meier survival analysis of 12-month follow-up showed that the time for poor prognosis in HFrEF patients with MHR>0.486 group (8.645 months) was significantly shorter than that in MHR≤0.486 group (10.296 months, P<0.001), and the risk of poor prognosis in MHR>0.486 group was 2.843 times higher than that in MHR≤0.486 group (HR=2.843, 95%CI:1.867-4.327). Conclusion: MHR can be an indicator of poor prognosis in patients with HFrEF.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
中华预防医学杂志
中华预防医学杂志 Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12678
期刊介绍: Chinese Journal of Preventive Medicine (CJPM), the successor to Chinese Health Journal , was initiated on October 1, 1953. In 1960, it was amalgamated with the Chinese Medical Journal and the Journal of Medical History and Health Care , and thereafter, was renamed as People’s Care . On November 25, 1978, the publication was denominated as Chinese Journal of Preventive Medicine . The contents of CJPM deal with a wide range of disciplines and technologies including epidemiology, environmental health, nutrition and food hygiene, occupational health, hygiene for children and adolescents, radiological health, toxicology, biostatistics, social medicine, pathogenic and epidemiological research in malignant tumor, surveillance and immunization.
期刊最新文献
[Expert recommendations on key technical points for implementing adult vaccination services]. [Association of serum uric acid level with pre-frailty and frailty in older adults]. [Expert consensus on key issues in japanese encephalitis prevention and control in China (2026 edition)]. [Association between sex hormone levels and sarcopenia risk among older adults over 65 years old in longevity areas of China]. [Research advances on the mechanisms of PM2.5 exposure induced brain region-selective injury and related disease associations].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1