儿童无并发症阑尾炎的非手术治疗,为什么不呢?随机对照试验的荟萃分析

IF 5.8 1区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE World Journal of Emergency Surgery Pub Date : 2025-03-25 DOI:10.1186/s13017-025-00584-9
Francesco Brucchi, Claudia Filisetti, Ester Luconi, Paola Fugazzola, Dario Cattaneo, Luca Ansaloni, Gianvincenzo Zuccotti, Simona Ferraro, Piergiorgio Danelli, Gloria Pelizzo
{"title":"儿童无并发症阑尾炎的非手术治疗,为什么不呢?随机对照试验的荟萃分析","authors":"Francesco Brucchi, Claudia Filisetti, Ester Luconi, Paola Fugazzola, Dario Cattaneo, Luca Ansaloni, Gianvincenzo Zuccotti, Simona Ferraro, Piergiorgio Danelli, Gloria Pelizzo","doi":"10.1186/s13017-025-00584-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to provide a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing non-operative management (NOM) and operative management (OM) in a pediatric population with uncomplicated acute appendicitis. A systematic literature review was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA), and Meta-analyses of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) guidelines. A comprehensive search was conducted in MEDLINE, Embase, and CENTRAL from inception to June 2024. Only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included, excluding studies involving adult patients and/or participants with complicated appendicitis. The variables considered were treatment complications, treatment efficacy during index admission and one-year follow-up, length of hospital stay (LOS), quality of life, and presence of appendicoliths. Three RCTs involving 269 participants (134 antibiotics/135 appendectomy) were included. There was no statistically significant difference between the two treatments in terms of complication risk (combined RD = − 0.03; 95% CI − 0.11; 0.06, p = 0.54), even including complications related to NOM failure. The risk of complication-free treatment success rate in the antibiotic group is lower than in the surgery group (combined RD = − 0.05; 95% CI − 0.13; − 0.04; p = 0.29). In patients without appendicolith, the combined risk difference of treatment success between NOM and OM was not statistically significant − 0.01 (IC − 0.17; 0.16; p value: 0.93). There is no statistical difference in terms of efficacy at 1 year, between NOM and OM (combined RD = − 0.06; 95% CI − 0.21; 0.09), p = 0.44). The LOS in the NOM group is significantly longer than in the OM group (difference of median = − 19.90 h; 95% CI − 29.27; − 10.53, p < .0001). This systematic review and meta-analysis provide evidence that NOM is safe and feasible for children with uncomplicated appendicitis and, in the group of patients without appendicolith, it is associated with a similar success rate to OM. However, more high-quality studies with adequate power and construction are still needed.","PeriodicalId":48867,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Emergency Surgery","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Non-operative management of uncomplicated appendicitis in children, why not? A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials\",\"authors\":\"Francesco Brucchi, Claudia Filisetti, Ester Luconi, Paola Fugazzola, Dario Cattaneo, Luca Ansaloni, Gianvincenzo Zuccotti, Simona Ferraro, Piergiorgio Danelli, Gloria Pelizzo\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13017-025-00584-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study aims to provide a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing non-operative management (NOM) and operative management (OM) in a pediatric population with uncomplicated acute appendicitis. A systematic literature review was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA), and Meta-analyses of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) guidelines. A comprehensive search was conducted in MEDLINE, Embase, and CENTRAL from inception to June 2024. Only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included, excluding studies involving adult patients and/or participants with complicated appendicitis. The variables considered were treatment complications, treatment efficacy during index admission and one-year follow-up, length of hospital stay (LOS), quality of life, and presence of appendicoliths. Three RCTs involving 269 participants (134 antibiotics/135 appendectomy) were included. There was no statistically significant difference between the two treatments in terms of complication risk (combined RD = − 0.03; 95% CI − 0.11; 0.06, p = 0.54), even including complications related to NOM failure. The risk of complication-free treatment success rate in the antibiotic group is lower than in the surgery group (combined RD = − 0.05; 95% CI − 0.13; − 0.04; p = 0.29). In patients without appendicolith, the combined risk difference of treatment success between NOM and OM was not statistically significant − 0.01 (IC − 0.17; 0.16; p value: 0.93). There is no statistical difference in terms of efficacy at 1 year, between NOM and OM (combined RD = − 0.06; 95% CI − 0.21; 0.09), p = 0.44). The LOS in the NOM group is significantly longer than in the OM group (difference of median = − 19.90 h; 95% CI − 29.27; − 10.53, p < .0001). This systematic review and meta-analysis provide evidence that NOM is safe and feasible for children with uncomplicated appendicitis and, in the group of patients without appendicolith, it is associated with a similar success rate to OM. However, more high-quality studies with adequate power and construction are still needed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48867,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"World Journal of Emergency Surgery\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"World Journal of Emergency Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13017-025-00584-9\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Emergency Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13017-025-00584-9","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在对随机对照试验(RCT)进行荟萃分析,比较非手术治疗(NOM)和手术治疗(OM)在无并发症急性阑尾炎儿科患者中的应用。根据《系统综述和元分析首选报告项目》(PRISMA)和《流行病学观察性研究元分析》(MOOSE)指南进行了系统性文献综述。从开始到 2024 年 6 月,我们在 MEDLINE、Embase 和 CENTRAL 中进行了全面检索。只纳入了随机对照试验(RCT),排除了涉及成年患者和/或患有复杂性阑尾炎的参与者的研究。研究考虑的变量包括治疗并发症、指标入院和一年随访期间的治疗效果、住院时间(LOS)、生活质量以及是否存在阑尾结石。共纳入了三项研究,涉及 269 名参与者(134 名抗生素患者/135 名阑尾切除术患者)。两种治疗方法在并发症风险方面没有统计学意义上的显著差异(合并 RD = - 0.03; 95% CI - 0.11; 0.06, p = 0.54),甚至包括与 NOM 失败相关的并发症。抗生素组的无并发症治疗成功率风险低于手术组(合并 RD = - 0.05; 95% CI - 0.13; - 0.04; p = 0.29)。在无阑尾结石的患者中,NOM 和 OM 治疗成功率的综合风险差异无统计学意义-0.01(IC - 0.17; 0.16; p 值:0.93)。就 1 年疗效而言,NOM 和 OM 没有统计学差异(合并 RD = - 0.06;95% CI - 0.21;0.09),P = 0.44)。NOM 组的 LOS 明显长于 OM 组(中位数差异 = - 19.90 h;95% CI - 29.27; - 10.53,p < .0001)。本系统综述和荟萃分析提供的证据表明,NOM 对无并发症阑尾炎患儿是安全可行的,而且在无阑尾结石的患者组中,其成功率与 OM 相似。不过,仍需进行更多高质量、有足够力量和结构的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Non-operative management of uncomplicated appendicitis in children, why not? A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
This study aims to provide a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing non-operative management (NOM) and operative management (OM) in a pediatric population with uncomplicated acute appendicitis. A systematic literature review was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA), and Meta-analyses of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) guidelines. A comprehensive search was conducted in MEDLINE, Embase, and CENTRAL from inception to June 2024. Only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included, excluding studies involving adult patients and/or participants with complicated appendicitis. The variables considered were treatment complications, treatment efficacy during index admission and one-year follow-up, length of hospital stay (LOS), quality of life, and presence of appendicoliths. Three RCTs involving 269 participants (134 antibiotics/135 appendectomy) were included. There was no statistically significant difference between the two treatments in terms of complication risk (combined RD = − 0.03; 95% CI − 0.11; 0.06, p = 0.54), even including complications related to NOM failure. The risk of complication-free treatment success rate in the antibiotic group is lower than in the surgery group (combined RD = − 0.05; 95% CI − 0.13; − 0.04; p = 0.29). In patients without appendicolith, the combined risk difference of treatment success between NOM and OM was not statistically significant − 0.01 (IC − 0.17; 0.16; p value: 0.93). There is no statistical difference in terms of efficacy at 1 year, between NOM and OM (combined RD = − 0.06; 95% CI − 0.21; 0.09), p = 0.44). The LOS in the NOM group is significantly longer than in the OM group (difference of median = − 19.90 h; 95% CI − 29.27; − 10.53, p < .0001). This systematic review and meta-analysis provide evidence that NOM is safe and feasible for children with uncomplicated appendicitis and, in the group of patients without appendicolith, it is associated with a similar success rate to OM. However, more high-quality studies with adequate power and construction are still needed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
World Journal of Emergency Surgery
World Journal of Emergency Surgery EMERGENCY MEDICINE-SURGERY
CiteScore
14.50
自引率
5.00%
发文量
60
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: The World Journal of Emergency Surgery is an open access, peer-reviewed journal covering all facets of clinical and basic research in traumatic and non-traumatic emergency surgery and related fields. Topics include emergency surgery, acute care surgery, trauma surgery, intensive care, trauma management, and resuscitation, among others.
期刊最新文献
Impact of blunt adrenal gland injury (BAGI) in major trauma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Dogma, data, and decision-making: a history of treatment for small-bowel obstruction. Re: Small versus large bore chest tube in traumatic hemothorax, hemopneumothorax, and pneumothorax-external validity, endpoint heterogeneity, and trial sequential analysis assumptions : Author. Acute cholecystitis: a new technique to use carefully. Risk of delayed displacement and biomechanical analysis of unstable rib fractures postsurgical.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1