体验会让潜在买家离开吗?消费价值观、情感和体验对纯电动汽车购买的影响

IF 3.3 Q3 TRANSPORTATION Case Studies on Transport Policy Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-23 DOI:10.1016/j.cstp.2025.101436
Breda McCarthy , Diane Jarvis , Daniel Grainger
{"title":"体验会让潜在买家离开吗?消费价值观、情感和体验对纯电动汽车购买的影响","authors":"Breda McCarthy ,&nbsp;Diane Jarvis ,&nbsp;Daniel Grainger","doi":"10.1016/j.cstp.2025.101436","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Consumption values influence consumer choices in many industries. However, prior experience does not appear to have been combined with consumption value theory to explain attitudes towards electric vehicles. According to consumption value theory, value is multi-dimensional and product choice is influenced by perceptions of utilitarian and emotional value. The objective of this study is to evaluate the extent to which perceived values, emotions and experience influence attitudes and purchase intentions. As a high involvement decision, car buying is generally considered from a utilitarian, cost-benefit perspective. By considering the emotional and experiential facets of decision making, this study contributes to the literature and extends the theory of consumption values. The findings are based on a survey of older, higher income car buyers (n = 340), a segment that might convert from conventional to battery electric vehicles. Data analysis consists of partial least squares structural equation modeling. The results show that anticipated emotions, contextual change, charging anxiety and hedonic value have a significant effect on attitudes, which drive purchase intentions. The results show that prior experience is a double edged sword: although prior experience weakens charging anxieties, it dampens emotions. Several recommendations for policy makers and practitioners are made to promote the diffusion of battery electric vehicles in Australia and other laggard markets.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46989,"journal":{"name":"Case Studies on Transport Policy","volume":"20 ","pages":"Article 101436"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does experience drive potential buyers away? The influence of consumption values, emotions and experience on the purchase of battery electric vehicles\",\"authors\":\"Breda McCarthy ,&nbsp;Diane Jarvis ,&nbsp;Daniel Grainger\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cstp.2025.101436\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Consumption values influence consumer choices in many industries. However, prior experience does not appear to have been combined with consumption value theory to explain attitudes towards electric vehicles. According to consumption value theory, value is multi-dimensional and product choice is influenced by perceptions of utilitarian and emotional value. The objective of this study is to evaluate the extent to which perceived values, emotions and experience influence attitudes and purchase intentions. As a high involvement decision, car buying is generally considered from a utilitarian, cost-benefit perspective. By considering the emotional and experiential facets of decision making, this study contributes to the literature and extends the theory of consumption values. The findings are based on a survey of older, higher income car buyers (n = 340), a segment that might convert from conventional to battery electric vehicles. Data analysis consists of partial least squares structural equation modeling. The results show that anticipated emotions, contextual change, charging anxiety and hedonic value have a significant effect on attitudes, which drive purchase intentions. The results show that prior experience is a double edged sword: although prior experience weakens charging anxieties, it dampens emotions. Several recommendations for policy makers and practitioners are made to promote the diffusion of battery electric vehicles in Australia and other laggard markets.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46989,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Case Studies on Transport Policy\",\"volume\":\"20 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101436\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Case Studies on Transport Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213624X25000732\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/3/23 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"TRANSPORTATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Case Studies on Transport Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213624X25000732","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"TRANSPORTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

消费价值观影响着许多行业的消费者选择。然而,之前的经验似乎并没有与消费价值理论相结合来解释对电动汽车的态度。根据消费价值理论,价值是多维度的,产品选择受到功利价值和情感价值观念的影响。本研究的目的是评估感知价值、情绪和经验对态度和购买意愿的影响程度。汽车购买作为一种高介入决策,通常是从功利主义、成本效益的角度来考虑的。通过考虑决策的情感和经验方面,本研究对文献有所贡献,并扩展了消费价值理论。这些发现是基于对年龄较大、收入较高的购车者(n = 340)的调查得出的,这一群体可能会从传统汽车转向纯电动汽车。数据分析采用偏最小二乘结构方程模型。结果表明,预期情绪、情境变化、收费焦虑和享乐价值对态度有显著影响,态度驱动购买意愿。研究结果表明,先前的经验是一把双刃剑:虽然先前的经验会减弱焦虑,但它会抑制情绪。为政策制定者和从业者提出了一些建议,以促进电池电动汽车在澳大利亚和其他落后市场的推广。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Does experience drive potential buyers away? The influence of consumption values, emotions and experience on the purchase of battery electric vehicles
Consumption values influence consumer choices in many industries. However, prior experience does not appear to have been combined with consumption value theory to explain attitudes towards electric vehicles. According to consumption value theory, value is multi-dimensional and product choice is influenced by perceptions of utilitarian and emotional value. The objective of this study is to evaluate the extent to which perceived values, emotions and experience influence attitudes and purchase intentions. As a high involvement decision, car buying is generally considered from a utilitarian, cost-benefit perspective. By considering the emotional and experiential facets of decision making, this study contributes to the literature and extends the theory of consumption values. The findings are based on a survey of older, higher income car buyers (n = 340), a segment that might convert from conventional to battery electric vehicles. Data analysis consists of partial least squares structural equation modeling. The results show that anticipated emotions, contextual change, charging anxiety and hedonic value have a significant effect on attitudes, which drive purchase intentions. The results show that prior experience is a double edged sword: although prior experience weakens charging anxieties, it dampens emotions. Several recommendations for policy makers and practitioners are made to promote the diffusion of battery electric vehicles in Australia and other laggard markets.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
12.00%
发文量
222
期刊最新文献
Integrating citizen’s perspectives in urban mobility: Lessons from Tallinn and Skopje Data-driven framework for urban air mobility planning: Integrating socioeconomic and operational factors for optimal network design in São Paulo, Brazil When extra-role work sustains congested airports: Citizenship fatigue, leadership limits, and affective commitment in ground operations Disability and urban mobility: towards inclusive transport in Mekelle The topology of favela street networks and its relationship with surrounding real estate value: A spatial and complex networks analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1