TLD和GM探测器长期测量室外空气中自然伽马吸收剂量率的比较研究

IF 1.6 3区 化学 Q3 CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry Pub Date : 2025-01-04 DOI:10.1007/s10967-024-09946-0
Pratip Mitra, S. K. Sahu, A. Vinod Kumar
{"title":"TLD和GM探测器长期测量室外空气中自然伽马吸收剂量率的比较研究","authors":"Pratip Mitra,&nbsp;S. K. Sahu,&nbsp;A. Vinod Kumar","doi":"10.1007/s10967-024-09946-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This paper investigates and compares two widely employed techniques for measuring natural gamma absorbed dose rate in outdoor air: the thermoluminescent dosimeter (TLD) and the Geiger-Mueller (GM) detector-based environmental radiation monitor (ERM). Over two decades (2003–2023), measurements were conducted at eighteen investigation sites having a wide variation of local dose rate values. The TLDs accumulated quarterly doses, while the ERMs recorded hourly dose rates. The comparison of mean dose rates obtained by the two methods agreed within ± 30% for all sites. A strong positive correlation was obtained between the two methods.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":661,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry","volume":"334 3","pages":"2391 - 2396"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10967-024-09946-0.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comparative study of long-term measurements of natural gamma absorbed dose rate in outdoor air by TLD and GM detectors\",\"authors\":\"Pratip Mitra,&nbsp;S. K. Sahu,&nbsp;A. Vinod Kumar\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10967-024-09946-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This paper investigates and compares two widely employed techniques for measuring natural gamma absorbed dose rate in outdoor air: the thermoluminescent dosimeter (TLD) and the Geiger-Mueller (GM) detector-based environmental radiation monitor (ERM). Over two decades (2003–2023), measurements were conducted at eighteen investigation sites having a wide variation of local dose rate values. The TLDs accumulated quarterly doses, while the ERMs recorded hourly dose rates. The comparison of mean dose rates obtained by the two methods agreed within ± 30% for all sites. A strong positive correlation was obtained between the two methods.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":661,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry\",\"volume\":\"334 3\",\"pages\":\"2391 - 2396\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10967-024-09946-0.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"92\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10967-024-09946-0\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10967-024-09946-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文研究并比较了两种广泛使用的测量室外空气中自然伽马吸收剂量率的技术:热释光剂量计(TLD)和基于盖格-穆勒(GM)探测器的环境辐射监测仪(ERM)。在二十年(2003-2023年)期间,在当地剂量率值变化很大的18个调查点进行了测量。顶级区域按季度累积剂量,而辐射管理单位则按小时记录剂量率。两种方法得到的平均剂量率比较在±30%范围内一致。两种方法之间有很强的正相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A comparative study of long-term measurements of natural gamma absorbed dose rate in outdoor air by TLD and GM detectors

This paper investigates and compares two widely employed techniques for measuring natural gamma absorbed dose rate in outdoor air: the thermoluminescent dosimeter (TLD) and the Geiger-Mueller (GM) detector-based environmental radiation monitor (ERM). Over two decades (2003–2023), measurements were conducted at eighteen investigation sites having a wide variation of local dose rate values. The TLDs accumulated quarterly doses, while the ERMs recorded hourly dose rates. The comparison of mean dose rates obtained by the two methods agreed within ± 30% for all sites. A strong positive correlation was obtained between the two methods.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
18.80%
发文量
504
审稿时长
2.2 months
期刊介绍: An international periodical publishing original papers, letters, review papers and short communications on nuclear chemistry. The subjects covered include: Nuclear chemistry, Radiochemistry, Radiation chemistry, Radiobiological chemistry, Environmental radiochemistry, Production and control of radioisotopes and labelled compounds, Nuclear power plant chemistry, Nuclear fuel chemistry, Radioanalytical chemistry, Radiation detection and measurement, Nuclear instrumentation and automation, etc.
期刊最新文献
Characterizing microscale signatures in uranium ore concentrates using electron probe microanalyzer Validation of the estimation of 192Ir production rates in wires from natural iridium-platinum in research reactors Development of qualification protocols for a coaxial high-purity germanium gamma spectrometer in radiopharmaceutical quality control. Part II: Operational and performance qualification Application of quadrupole-inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry in the analysis of plutonium content of fast critical assembly fuel disposition Planar donor–acceptor conjugated microporous polymer enhancing the removal of TcO −4 /ReO −4
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1