Emmanouil Tyllianakis , Meike Will , Tomáš Václavík , Guy Ziv
{"title":"欧洲农民对农业环境公共产品计划的驱动因素和偏好:一个两阶段分析","authors":"Emmanouil Tyllianakis , Meike Will , Tomáš Václavík , Guy Ziv","doi":"10.1016/j.jnc.2025.126912","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The new Common Agriculture Policy (CAP) intends to give more freedom to countries to manage their budget while increasing funding for income support and provisioning of climate public goods from agriculture and farming. For the past 20 years this has been operationalised through incentivising farmers’ contract participation in agri-environmental schemes (AES). In this paper we examine through a two-stage approach, farmer preferences for contract characteristics in a multi-European country Discrete Choice Experiment (DCE) and the determinants of land enrolment in contracts. Overall, we find that longer contracts and high administrative burden decrease the probability of enrolling in a contract over the base levels while shorter contract length and provisioning of advisory support are desirable. Amongst all available contract options, converting arable to grassland options was by far the one that participants asked the most compensation for, across countries. We also find that past experience with agri-environmental schemes and socio-demographics have a strong and statistically significant effect on the percentage of land enrolled, while contract characteristics do not influence enrolment. Finally, we present some evidence of position-ordering effects affecting preferences for contracts and their characteristics but not influencing contract enrolment. Understanding the true cost incurred by farmers to implement AES is crucial for policymakers as failure to do so can make farmers ask for much higher compensation, per hectare, potentially to cover costs of transitioning to different types of farming or to incorporate financial risk by significantly altering their farm practices.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54898,"journal":{"name":"Journal for Nature Conservation","volume":"86 ","pages":"Article 126912"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Drivers and Preferences of European Farmers for Agri-Environmental Public Goods Schemes: A Two-Stage Analysis\",\"authors\":\"Emmanouil Tyllianakis , Meike Will , Tomáš Václavík , Guy Ziv\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jnc.2025.126912\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The new Common Agriculture Policy (CAP) intends to give more freedom to countries to manage their budget while increasing funding for income support and provisioning of climate public goods from agriculture and farming. For the past 20 years this has been operationalised through incentivising farmers’ contract participation in agri-environmental schemes (AES). In this paper we examine through a two-stage approach, farmer preferences for contract characteristics in a multi-European country Discrete Choice Experiment (DCE) and the determinants of land enrolment in contracts. Overall, we find that longer contracts and high administrative burden decrease the probability of enrolling in a contract over the base levels while shorter contract length and provisioning of advisory support are desirable. Amongst all available contract options, converting arable to grassland options was by far the one that participants asked the most compensation for, across countries. We also find that past experience with agri-environmental schemes and socio-demographics have a strong and statistically significant effect on the percentage of land enrolled, while contract characteristics do not influence enrolment. Finally, we present some evidence of position-ordering effects affecting preferences for contracts and their characteristics but not influencing contract enrolment. Understanding the true cost incurred by farmers to implement AES is crucial for policymakers as failure to do so can make farmers ask for much higher compensation, per hectare, potentially to cover costs of transitioning to different types of farming or to incorporate financial risk by significantly altering their farm practices.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54898,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal for Nature Conservation\",\"volume\":\"86 \",\"pages\":\"Article 126912\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal for Nature Conservation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1617138125000895\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/3/26 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal for Nature Conservation","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1617138125000895","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
Drivers and Preferences of European Farmers for Agri-Environmental Public Goods Schemes: A Two-Stage Analysis
The new Common Agriculture Policy (CAP) intends to give more freedom to countries to manage their budget while increasing funding for income support and provisioning of climate public goods from agriculture and farming. For the past 20 years this has been operationalised through incentivising farmers’ contract participation in agri-environmental schemes (AES). In this paper we examine through a two-stage approach, farmer preferences for contract characteristics in a multi-European country Discrete Choice Experiment (DCE) and the determinants of land enrolment in contracts. Overall, we find that longer contracts and high administrative burden decrease the probability of enrolling in a contract over the base levels while shorter contract length and provisioning of advisory support are desirable. Amongst all available contract options, converting arable to grassland options was by far the one that participants asked the most compensation for, across countries. We also find that past experience with agri-environmental schemes and socio-demographics have a strong and statistically significant effect on the percentage of land enrolled, while contract characteristics do not influence enrolment. Finally, we present some evidence of position-ordering effects affecting preferences for contracts and their characteristics but not influencing contract enrolment. Understanding the true cost incurred by farmers to implement AES is crucial for policymakers as failure to do so can make farmers ask for much higher compensation, per hectare, potentially to cover costs of transitioning to different types of farming or to incorporate financial risk by significantly altering their farm practices.
期刊介绍:
The Journal for Nature Conservation addresses concepts, methods and techniques for nature conservation. This international and interdisciplinary journal encourages collaboration between scientists and practitioners, including the integration of biodiversity issues with social and economic concepts. Therefore, conceptual, technical and methodological papers, as well as reviews, research papers, and short communications are welcomed from a wide range of disciplines, including theoretical ecology, landscape ecology, restoration ecology, ecological modelling, and others, provided that there is a clear connection and immediate relevance to nature conservation.
Manuscripts without any immediate conservation context, such as inventories, distribution modelling, genetic studies, animal behaviour, plant physiology, will not be considered for this journal; though such data may be useful for conservationists and managers in the future, this is outside of the current scope of the journal.