多癌早期检测:与患者进行初级保健讨论的指南

IF 5.1 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Cancer Pub Date : 2025-04-02 DOI:10.1002/cncr.35823
Richard M. Hoffman MD, MPH, Andrew M. D. Wolf MD, Sana Raoof MD, PhD, Carmen E. Guerra MD, MSCE, Timothy R. Church PhD, Elena B. Elkin PhD, MPA, Ruth D. Etzioni PhD, Ya-Chen Tina Shih PhD, Steven J. Skates PhD, Deana Manassaram-Baptiste PhD, MPH, Robert A. Smith PhD
{"title":"多癌早期检测:与患者进行初级保健讨论的指南","authors":"Richard M. Hoffman MD, MPH,&nbsp;Andrew M. D. Wolf MD,&nbsp;Sana Raoof MD, PhD,&nbsp;Carmen E. Guerra MD, MSCE,&nbsp;Timothy R. Church PhD,&nbsp;Elena B. Elkin PhD, MPA,&nbsp;Ruth D. Etzioni PhD,&nbsp;Ya-Chen Tina Shih PhD,&nbsp;Steven J. Skates PhD,&nbsp;Deana Manassaram-Baptiste PhD, MPH,&nbsp;Robert A. Smith PhD","doi":"10.1002/cncr.35823","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Multicancer early detection (MCED) tests are an emerging technology for cancer screening. MCED tests can detect cancer signals from multiple cancers concurrently in biological samples such as blood, urine, saliva, or other bodily fluids. Some tests can suggest the most likely cancer origin, whereas others report cancer detected somewhere in the body. Although some MCED tests are currently commercially available, none are approved by the Food and Drug Administration or endorsed by any clinical practice guideline or recommendation. Most insurance companies do not currently cover MCED testing. MCED tests have not yet been evaluated for safety and effectiveness in randomized controlled trials. Because patients already are asking for MCED test prescriptions or for interpretation of results from tests acquired elsewhere, clinicians should be prepared to discuss what is known about the benefits, risks, and uncertainties of MCED testing, including performance characteristics in screening populations and preferred follow-up strategies for positive test results. At this time, clinicians should not feel obligated to initiate discussions about MCED testing with their patients. However, clinicians should engage patients who inquire about getting tested or previous MCED test results in shared decision-making, and take the opportunity to offer and help patients complete age- and sex-appropriate guideline-recommended cancer screenings. In this article, the current evidence and issues around MCED testing are summarized, and a framework for shared decision-making discussions is provided.</p>","PeriodicalId":138,"journal":{"name":"Cancer","volume":"131 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cncr.35823","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multicancer early detection testing: Guidance for primary care discussions with patients\",\"authors\":\"Richard M. Hoffman MD, MPH,&nbsp;Andrew M. D. Wolf MD,&nbsp;Sana Raoof MD, PhD,&nbsp;Carmen E. Guerra MD, MSCE,&nbsp;Timothy R. Church PhD,&nbsp;Elena B. Elkin PhD, MPA,&nbsp;Ruth D. Etzioni PhD,&nbsp;Ya-Chen Tina Shih PhD,&nbsp;Steven J. Skates PhD,&nbsp;Deana Manassaram-Baptiste PhD, MPH,&nbsp;Robert A. Smith PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/cncr.35823\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Multicancer early detection (MCED) tests are an emerging technology for cancer screening. MCED tests can detect cancer signals from multiple cancers concurrently in biological samples such as blood, urine, saliva, or other bodily fluids. Some tests can suggest the most likely cancer origin, whereas others report cancer detected somewhere in the body. Although some MCED tests are currently commercially available, none are approved by the Food and Drug Administration or endorsed by any clinical practice guideline or recommendation. Most insurance companies do not currently cover MCED testing. MCED tests have not yet been evaluated for safety and effectiveness in randomized controlled trials. Because patients already are asking for MCED test prescriptions or for interpretation of results from tests acquired elsewhere, clinicians should be prepared to discuss what is known about the benefits, risks, and uncertainties of MCED testing, including performance characteristics in screening populations and preferred follow-up strategies for positive test results. At this time, clinicians should not feel obligated to initiate discussions about MCED testing with their patients. However, clinicians should engage patients who inquire about getting tested or previous MCED test results in shared decision-making, and take the opportunity to offer and help patients complete age- and sex-appropriate guideline-recommended cancer screenings. In this article, the current evidence and issues around MCED testing are summarized, and a framework for shared decision-making discussions is provided.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":138,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cancer\",\"volume\":\"131 7\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cncr.35823\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cancer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://acsjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cncr.35823\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://acsjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cncr.35823","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

多癌早期检测(MCED)是一种新兴的癌症筛查技术。MCED测试可以在血液、尿液、唾液或其他体液等生物样本中同时检测出多种癌症的信号。一些测试可以提示最可能的癌症来源,而另一些则报告在身体的某个地方检测到癌症。虽然一些MCED测试目前在商业上可用,但没有一个得到食品和药物管理局的批准或任何临床实践指南或建议的认可。大多数保险公司目前不包括MCED测试。MCED试验的安全性和有效性尚未在随机对照试验中得到评价。由于患者已经要求开具MCED检测处方或对其他地方获得的检测结果进行解释,临床医生应准备好讨论已知的MCED检测的益处、风险和不确定性,包括筛查人群的表现特征和阳性检测结果的首选随访策略。此时,临床医生不应该觉得有义务与患者讨论MCED检测。然而,临床医生应该让那些询问是否接受检测或以前的MCED检测结果的患者参与共同决策,并抓住机会提供和帮助患者完成指南推荐的适合年龄和性别的癌症筛查。本文总结了目前关于MCED测试的证据和问题,并提供了一个共同决策讨论的框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Multicancer early detection testing: Guidance for primary care discussions with patients

Multicancer early detection (MCED) tests are an emerging technology for cancer screening. MCED tests can detect cancer signals from multiple cancers concurrently in biological samples such as blood, urine, saliva, or other bodily fluids. Some tests can suggest the most likely cancer origin, whereas others report cancer detected somewhere in the body. Although some MCED tests are currently commercially available, none are approved by the Food and Drug Administration or endorsed by any clinical practice guideline or recommendation. Most insurance companies do not currently cover MCED testing. MCED tests have not yet been evaluated for safety and effectiveness in randomized controlled trials. Because patients already are asking for MCED test prescriptions or for interpretation of results from tests acquired elsewhere, clinicians should be prepared to discuss what is known about the benefits, risks, and uncertainties of MCED testing, including performance characteristics in screening populations and preferred follow-up strategies for positive test results. At this time, clinicians should not feel obligated to initiate discussions about MCED testing with their patients. However, clinicians should engage patients who inquire about getting tested or previous MCED test results in shared decision-making, and take the opportunity to offer and help patients complete age- and sex-appropriate guideline-recommended cancer screenings. In this article, the current evidence and issues around MCED testing are summarized, and a framework for shared decision-making discussions is provided.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cancer
Cancer 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
13.10
自引率
3.20%
发文量
480
审稿时长
2-3 weeks
期刊介绍: The CANCER site is a full-text, electronic implementation of CANCER, an Interdisciplinary International Journal of the American Cancer Society, and CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, a Journal of the American Cancer Society. CANCER publishes interdisciplinary oncologic information according to, but not limited to, the following disease sites and disciplines: blood/bone marrow; breast disease; endocrine disorders; epidemiology; gastrointestinal tract; genitourinary disease; gynecologic oncology; head and neck disease; hepatobiliary tract; integrated medicine; lung disease; medical oncology; neuro-oncology; pathology radiation oncology; translational research
期刊最新文献
The importance of studying sex and gender in cancer research: Why and how. Prognostic impact of ASXL1 mutations in acute myeloid leukemia treated with lower intensity therapy. Clonal hematopoiesis in patients with cancer and cancer survivors: From clonal burden to cardiovascular diseases. Diabetes and cancer incidence among adults in the Hispanic Community Health Study/Study of Latinos. Defining a role for venetoclax and hypomethylating agent therapy in younger adults with acute myeloid leukemia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1