Atze van der Pol, Marijn C Peters, Ignasi Jorba, Anke M Smits, Niels P van der Kaaij, Marie-Jose Goumans, Kimberley E Wever, Carlijn V C Bouten
{"title":"基于细胞外基质的心肌梗死临床前治疗策略:系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Atze van der Pol, Marijn C Peters, Ignasi Jorba, Anke M Smits, Niels P van der Kaaij, Marie-Jose Goumans, Kimberley E Wever, Carlijn V C Bouten","doi":"10.1038/s43856-025-00812-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Administrating extracellular matrix (ECM) to restore cardiac function post-myocardial infarction (MI) shows promise, however study variability obscures its true impact. We therefore conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of preclinical studies to assess the effects of ECM treatments on cardiac function and tissue homeostasis post-MI.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched PubMed and SCOPUS from inception to June 28, 2024, for animal studies describing ECM treatment post-MI (pre-registered on PROSPERO, CRD42022368400). Random effects meta-analyses compared ECM treatment to controls regarding left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), fractional shortening, infarct size, stroke volume, and left ventricular wall thickness. Subgroup analyses examined the influence of sex, species, ECM source, and administration method. Funnel plots and Egger's regression assessed publication bias.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identify 88 articles which meet our inclusion criteria. These studies describe the use of rats (51%), mice (38%), and pigs (11%). 44% of studies use males, 34% females, 5% both sexes, and 17% did not report sex. Most studies employ permanent MI models (85%) over ischemia reperfusion models (15%), and deliver ECM via intramyocardial injection (59%), cardiac patch (39%), cardiac sleeve (1%), or osmotic pump (1%). Our meta-analysis demonstrates that ECM treatment significantly improves LVEF (MD: 10.9%, 95% CI: [8.7%;13.0%]; p = 8.057e-24), fractional shortening (MD: 8.2%, 95% CI: [5.6%; 10.9%]; p = 1.751e-09), stroke volume (SMD 0.6, 95% CI: [0.2;1.0], p = 0.004), left ventricular wall thickening (SMD 1.2, 95% CI: [0.9; 1.5], p = 1.321e-17), while reducing infarct size (-11.7%, 95% CI: [-14.7%;-8.6%], p = 3.699e-14). We find no significant differences between the various subgroups and no indication of publication bias.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ECM-based treatments significantly enhance cardiac function and tissue homeostasis in preclinical post-MI models, supporting further research toward clinical translation.</p>","PeriodicalId":72646,"journal":{"name":"Communications medicine","volume":"5 1","pages":"95"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11955565/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Preclinical extracellular matrix-based treatment strategies for myocardial infarction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Atze van der Pol, Marijn C Peters, Ignasi Jorba, Anke M Smits, Niels P van der Kaaij, Marie-Jose Goumans, Kimberley E Wever, Carlijn V C Bouten\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s43856-025-00812-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Administrating extracellular matrix (ECM) to restore cardiac function post-myocardial infarction (MI) shows promise, however study variability obscures its true impact. We therefore conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of preclinical studies to assess the effects of ECM treatments on cardiac function and tissue homeostasis post-MI.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched PubMed and SCOPUS from inception to June 28, 2024, for animal studies describing ECM treatment post-MI (pre-registered on PROSPERO, CRD42022368400). Random effects meta-analyses compared ECM treatment to controls regarding left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), fractional shortening, infarct size, stroke volume, and left ventricular wall thickness. Subgroup analyses examined the influence of sex, species, ECM source, and administration method. Funnel plots and Egger's regression assessed publication bias.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identify 88 articles which meet our inclusion criteria. These studies describe the use of rats (51%), mice (38%), and pigs (11%). 44% of studies use males, 34% females, 5% both sexes, and 17% did not report sex. Most studies employ permanent MI models (85%) over ischemia reperfusion models (15%), and deliver ECM via intramyocardial injection (59%), cardiac patch (39%), cardiac sleeve (1%), or osmotic pump (1%). Our meta-analysis demonstrates that ECM treatment significantly improves LVEF (MD: 10.9%, 95% CI: [8.7%;13.0%]; p = 8.057e-24), fractional shortening (MD: 8.2%, 95% CI: [5.6%; 10.9%]; p = 1.751e-09), stroke volume (SMD 0.6, 95% CI: [0.2;1.0], p = 0.004), left ventricular wall thickening (SMD 1.2, 95% CI: [0.9; 1.5], p = 1.321e-17), while reducing infarct size (-11.7%, 95% CI: [-14.7%;-8.6%], p = 3.699e-14). We find no significant differences between the various subgroups and no indication of publication bias.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ECM-based treatments significantly enhance cardiac function and tissue homeostasis in preclinical post-MI models, supporting further research toward clinical translation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72646,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Communications medicine\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"95\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11955565/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Communications medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s43856-025-00812-y\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Communications medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s43856-025-00812-y","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Preclinical extracellular matrix-based treatment strategies for myocardial infarction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Background: Administrating extracellular matrix (ECM) to restore cardiac function post-myocardial infarction (MI) shows promise, however study variability obscures its true impact. We therefore conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of preclinical studies to assess the effects of ECM treatments on cardiac function and tissue homeostasis post-MI.
Methods: We searched PubMed and SCOPUS from inception to June 28, 2024, for animal studies describing ECM treatment post-MI (pre-registered on PROSPERO, CRD42022368400). Random effects meta-analyses compared ECM treatment to controls regarding left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), fractional shortening, infarct size, stroke volume, and left ventricular wall thickness. Subgroup analyses examined the influence of sex, species, ECM source, and administration method. Funnel plots and Egger's regression assessed publication bias.
Results: We identify 88 articles which meet our inclusion criteria. These studies describe the use of rats (51%), mice (38%), and pigs (11%). 44% of studies use males, 34% females, 5% both sexes, and 17% did not report sex. Most studies employ permanent MI models (85%) over ischemia reperfusion models (15%), and deliver ECM via intramyocardial injection (59%), cardiac patch (39%), cardiac sleeve (1%), or osmotic pump (1%). Our meta-analysis demonstrates that ECM treatment significantly improves LVEF (MD: 10.9%, 95% CI: [8.7%;13.0%]; p = 8.057e-24), fractional shortening (MD: 8.2%, 95% CI: [5.6%; 10.9%]; p = 1.751e-09), stroke volume (SMD 0.6, 95% CI: [0.2;1.0], p = 0.004), left ventricular wall thickening (SMD 1.2, 95% CI: [0.9; 1.5], p = 1.321e-17), while reducing infarct size (-11.7%, 95% CI: [-14.7%;-8.6%], p = 3.699e-14). We find no significant differences between the various subgroups and no indication of publication bias.
Conclusions: ECM-based treatments significantly enhance cardiac function and tissue homeostasis in preclinical post-MI models, supporting further research toward clinical translation.