人工智能增强的虚拟现实心理咨询自言自语:形成性质的研究。

IF 2.4 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES JMIR Formative Research Pub Date : 2025-04-02 DOI:10.2196/67782
Moreah Zisquit, Alon Shoa, Ramon Oliva, Stav Perry, Bernhard Spanlang, Anat Brunstein Klomek, Mel Slater, Doron Friedman
{"title":"人工智能增强的虚拟现实心理咨询自言自语:形成性质的研究。","authors":"Moreah Zisquit, Alon Shoa, Ramon Oliva, Stav Perry, Bernhard Spanlang, Anat Brunstein Klomek, Mel Slater, Doron Friedman","doi":"10.2196/67782","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Access to mental health services continues to pose a global challenge, with current services often unable to meet the growing demand. This has sparked interest in conversational artificial intelligence (AI) agents as potential solutions. Despite this, the development of a reliable virtual therapist remains challenging, and the feasibility of AI fulfilling this sensitive role is still uncertain. One promising approach involves using AI agents for psychological self-talk, particularly within virtual reality (VR) environments. Self-talk in VR allows externalizing self-conversation by enabling individuals to embody avatars representing themselves as both patient and counselor, thus enhancing cognitive flexibility and problem-solving abilities. However, participants sometimes experience difficulties progressing in sessions, which is where AI could offer guidance and support.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This formative study aims to assess the challenges and advantages of integrating an AI agent into self-talk in VR for psychological counseling, focusing on user experience and the potential role of AI in supporting self-reflection, problem-solving, and positive behavioral change.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We carried out an iterative design and development of a system and protocol integrating large language models (LLMs) within VR self-talk during the first two and a half years. The design process addressed user interface, speech-to-text functionalities, fine-tuning the LLMs, and prompt engineering. Upon completion of the design process, we conducted a 3-month long exploratory qualitative study in which 11 healthy participants completed a session that included identifying a problem they wanted to address, attempting to address this problem using self-talk in VR, and then continuing self-talk in VR but this time with the assistance of an LLM-based virtual human. The sessions were carried out with a trained clinical psychologist and followed by semistructured interviews. We used applied thematic analysis after the interviews to code and develop key themes for the participants that addressed our research objective.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 4 themes were identified regarding the quality of advice, the potential advantages of human-AI collaboration in self-help, the believability of the virtual human, and user preferences for avatars in the scenario. The participants rated their desire to engage in additional such sessions at 8.3 out of 10, and more than half of the respondents indicated that they preferred using VR self-talk with AI rather than without it. On average, the usefulness of the session was rated 6.9 (SD 0.54), and the degree to which it helped solve their problem was rated 6.1 (SD 1.58). Participants specifically noted that human-AI collaboration led to improved outcomes and facilitated more positive thought processes, thereby enhancing self-reflection and problem-solving abilities.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This exploratory study suggests that the VR self-talk paradigm can be enhanced by LLM-based agents and presents the ways to achieve this, potential pitfalls, and additional insights.</p>","PeriodicalId":14841,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Formative Research","volume":"9 ","pages":"e67782"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12004015/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"AI-Enhanced Virtual Reality Self-Talk for Psychological Counseling: Formative Qualitative Study.\",\"authors\":\"Moreah Zisquit, Alon Shoa, Ramon Oliva, Stav Perry, Bernhard Spanlang, Anat Brunstein Klomek, Mel Slater, Doron Friedman\",\"doi\":\"10.2196/67782\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Access to mental health services continues to pose a global challenge, with current services often unable to meet the growing demand. This has sparked interest in conversational artificial intelligence (AI) agents as potential solutions. Despite this, the development of a reliable virtual therapist remains challenging, and the feasibility of AI fulfilling this sensitive role is still uncertain. One promising approach involves using AI agents for psychological self-talk, particularly within virtual reality (VR) environments. Self-talk in VR allows externalizing self-conversation by enabling individuals to embody avatars representing themselves as both patient and counselor, thus enhancing cognitive flexibility and problem-solving abilities. However, participants sometimes experience difficulties progressing in sessions, which is where AI could offer guidance and support.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This formative study aims to assess the challenges and advantages of integrating an AI agent into self-talk in VR for psychological counseling, focusing on user experience and the potential role of AI in supporting self-reflection, problem-solving, and positive behavioral change.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We carried out an iterative design and development of a system and protocol integrating large language models (LLMs) within VR self-talk during the first two and a half years. The design process addressed user interface, speech-to-text functionalities, fine-tuning the LLMs, and prompt engineering. Upon completion of the design process, we conducted a 3-month long exploratory qualitative study in which 11 healthy participants completed a session that included identifying a problem they wanted to address, attempting to address this problem using self-talk in VR, and then continuing self-talk in VR but this time with the assistance of an LLM-based virtual human. The sessions were carried out with a trained clinical psychologist and followed by semistructured interviews. We used applied thematic analysis after the interviews to code and develop key themes for the participants that addressed our research objective.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 4 themes were identified regarding the quality of advice, the potential advantages of human-AI collaboration in self-help, the believability of the virtual human, and user preferences for avatars in the scenario. The participants rated their desire to engage in additional such sessions at 8.3 out of 10, and more than half of the respondents indicated that they preferred using VR self-talk with AI rather than without it. On average, the usefulness of the session was rated 6.9 (SD 0.54), and the degree to which it helped solve their problem was rated 6.1 (SD 1.58). Participants specifically noted that human-AI collaboration led to improved outcomes and facilitated more positive thought processes, thereby enhancing self-reflection and problem-solving abilities.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This exploratory study suggests that the VR self-talk paradigm can be enhanced by LLM-based agents and presents the ways to achieve this, potential pitfalls, and additional insights.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14841,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JMIR Formative Research\",\"volume\":\"9 \",\"pages\":\"e67782\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12004015/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JMIR Formative Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2196/67782\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR Formative Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/67782","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:获得心理健康服务仍然是一项全球性挑战,目前的服务往往无法满足日益增长的需求。这引发了人们对人工智能(AI)对话代理作为潜在解决方案的兴趣。尽管如此,开发可靠的虚拟治疗师仍具有挑战性,而且人工智能扮演这一敏感角色的可行性仍不确定。一种很有前景的方法是使用人工智能代理进行心理自言自语,特别是在虚拟现实(VR)环境中。在虚拟现实环境中进行自我对话,可以使个人化身为既是患者又是咨询师的化身,从而提高认知灵活性和解决问题的能力,实现自我对话的外部化。然而,参与者有时会在会话过程中遇到困难,这正是人工智能可以提供指导和支持的地方:本形成性研究旨在评估将人工智能代理集成到心理咨询 VR 自我对话中的挑战和优势,重点关注用户体验以及人工智能在支持自我反思、解决问题和积极行为改变方面的潜在作用:方法:在最初的两年半时间里,我们对将大型语言模型(LLM)集成到 VR 自言自语中的系统和协议进行了迭代设计和开发。设计过程涉及用户界面、语音到文本功能、微调 LLM 和提示工程。设计过程完成后,我们进行了为期 3 个月的探索性定性研究,其中 11 名健康参与者完成了一个环节,包括确定他们想要解决的问题,尝试使用 VR 中的自我对话来解决这个问题,然后继续在 VR 中进行自我对话,但这次是在基于 LLM 的虚拟人的协助下进行的。这些过程都是由一名训练有素的临床心理学家进行的,之后还进行了半结构化访谈。访谈结束后,我们使用应用主题分析法对参与者进行了编码,并针对我们的研究目标制定了关键主题:总共确定了 4 个主题,分别涉及建议的质量、人类与人工智能合作在自助方面的潜在优势、虚拟人的可信度以及用户对场景中化身的偏好。在满分 10 分的情况下,参与者对参与更多此类会话的愿望评分为 8.3 分,超过半数的受访者表示,他们更喜欢使用有人工智能的 VR 自我对话,而不是没有人工智能的 VR 自我对话。平均而言,对话的有用性被评为 6.9(标准差为 0.54),而对话对解决问题的帮助程度被评为 6.1(标准差为 1.58)。参与者特别指出,人类与人工智能的合作改善了结果,促进了更积极的思维过程,从而提高了自我反思和解决问题的能力:这项探索性研究表明,基于 LLM 的代理可以增强虚拟现实自我对话范例,并介绍了实现这一目标的方法、潜在的陷阱和其他见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
AI-Enhanced Virtual Reality Self-Talk for Psychological Counseling: Formative Qualitative Study.

Background: Access to mental health services continues to pose a global challenge, with current services often unable to meet the growing demand. This has sparked interest in conversational artificial intelligence (AI) agents as potential solutions. Despite this, the development of a reliable virtual therapist remains challenging, and the feasibility of AI fulfilling this sensitive role is still uncertain. One promising approach involves using AI agents for psychological self-talk, particularly within virtual reality (VR) environments. Self-talk in VR allows externalizing self-conversation by enabling individuals to embody avatars representing themselves as both patient and counselor, thus enhancing cognitive flexibility and problem-solving abilities. However, participants sometimes experience difficulties progressing in sessions, which is where AI could offer guidance and support.

Objective: This formative study aims to assess the challenges and advantages of integrating an AI agent into self-talk in VR for psychological counseling, focusing on user experience and the potential role of AI in supporting self-reflection, problem-solving, and positive behavioral change.

Methods: We carried out an iterative design and development of a system and protocol integrating large language models (LLMs) within VR self-talk during the first two and a half years. The design process addressed user interface, speech-to-text functionalities, fine-tuning the LLMs, and prompt engineering. Upon completion of the design process, we conducted a 3-month long exploratory qualitative study in which 11 healthy participants completed a session that included identifying a problem they wanted to address, attempting to address this problem using self-talk in VR, and then continuing self-talk in VR but this time with the assistance of an LLM-based virtual human. The sessions were carried out with a trained clinical psychologist and followed by semistructured interviews. We used applied thematic analysis after the interviews to code and develop key themes for the participants that addressed our research objective.

Results: In total, 4 themes were identified regarding the quality of advice, the potential advantages of human-AI collaboration in self-help, the believability of the virtual human, and user preferences for avatars in the scenario. The participants rated their desire to engage in additional such sessions at 8.3 out of 10, and more than half of the respondents indicated that they preferred using VR self-talk with AI rather than without it. On average, the usefulness of the session was rated 6.9 (SD 0.54), and the degree to which it helped solve their problem was rated 6.1 (SD 1.58). Participants specifically noted that human-AI collaboration led to improved outcomes and facilitated more positive thought processes, thereby enhancing self-reflection and problem-solving abilities.

Conclusions: This exploratory study suggests that the VR self-talk paradigm can be enhanced by LLM-based agents and presents the ways to achieve this, potential pitfalls, and additional insights.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
JMIR Formative Research
JMIR Formative Research Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
9.10%
发文量
579
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Prevalence and Associations of Medical Expenditure Panel Survey-Defined Long COVID Among Adults: Cross-Sectional Study. Clinician Decision-Making Around Offering Home Video Telehealth Visits: Qualitative Study. Videos on Bilibili, TikTok, and Xiaohongshu as Sources of Medical Information on Adenoid Hypertrophy: Cross-Sectional Content Analysis. The Feasibility of an App-Based Worksite Health Promotion Program to Improve Mental Well-Being and Work-Related Vitality in University Hospital Workers: Process and Preliminary Effect Evaluation Study. Using In-Home Air Quality Monitoring to Reduce Cannabis Secondhand Smoke Exposure in Children: Quantitative Pilot Feasibility Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1