茶叶消费与膀胱癌风险之间的关系——基于膀胱癌流行病学和营养决定因素(BLEND)国际联盟。

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q3 NUTRITION & DIETETICS Nutrition and Cancer-An International Journal Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-08 DOI:10.1080/01635581.2025.2488063
Yan-Xi Zhang, Richard Albers, Ya-Ting Chen, Gunnar Steineck, Eliane Kellen, Kenneth C Johnson, Chih-Ming Lu, Hermann Pohlabeln, Carlo La Vecchia, Stefano Porru, Angela Carta, Jerry Polesel, Cristina Bosetti, Xuejuan Jiang, Li Tang, James Marshall, Margaret R Karagas, Zuo-Feng Zhang, Jack A Taylor, Maurice P A Zeegers, Anke Wesselius, Evan Yi-Wen Yu
{"title":"茶叶消费与膀胱癌风险之间的关系——基于膀胱癌流行病学和营养决定因素(BLEND)国际联盟。","authors":"Yan-Xi Zhang, Richard Albers, Ya-Ting Chen, Gunnar Steineck, Eliane Kellen, Kenneth C Johnson, Chih-Ming Lu, Hermann Pohlabeln, Carlo La Vecchia, Stefano Porru, Angela Carta, Jerry Polesel, Cristina Bosetti, Xuejuan Jiang, Li Tang, James Marshall, Margaret R Karagas, Zuo-Feng Zhang, Jack A Taylor, Maurice P A Zeegers, Anke Wesselius, Evan Yi-Wen Yu","doi":"10.1080/01635581.2025.2488063","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Evidence regarding the association between tea consumption and bladder cancer (BC) risk is inconsistent. This study aimed to increase our knowledge of the association by using international data from the Bladder Cancer Epidemiology and Nutritional Determinants Consortium.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Individual data on 2,347 cases and 6,871 controls from 15 case-control studies with information on black, green, herbal, or general tea was pooled. The association was estimated using multilevel multivariable logistic regression analysis adjusted for multiple (non-)dietary factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Association between tea consumption and BC risk was observed (odds ratio, OR = 0.72, 95% confidence interval, 95% CI = 0.65-0.80) compared to non-tea drinkers. Stratified analyses based on gender and smoking status yielded similar results. Stratified analysis showed no significant association between black or green tea consumption and BC risk across models, while herbal tea consumption was linked to a reduced BC risk (OR = 0.59, 95% CI = 0.36-0.96). As daily tea consumption increased within a suitable range (<5.67 cups/day), BC risk decreased.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong><i>Camellia sinensis</i> tea showed no association with BC risk, while herbal tea was inversely linked to BC incidence. Despite some significant findings in the selected strata, further studies are required to clarify the underlying mechanisms.</p>","PeriodicalId":54701,"journal":{"name":"Nutrition and Cancer-An International Journal","volume":" ","pages":"687-698"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12433241/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Association between Tea Consumption and Bladder Cancer Risk Based on the Bladder Cancer Epidemiology and Nutritional Determinants (BLEND) International Consortium.\",\"authors\":\"Yan-Xi Zhang, Richard Albers, Ya-Ting Chen, Gunnar Steineck, Eliane Kellen, Kenneth C Johnson, Chih-Ming Lu, Hermann Pohlabeln, Carlo La Vecchia, Stefano Porru, Angela Carta, Jerry Polesel, Cristina Bosetti, Xuejuan Jiang, Li Tang, James Marshall, Margaret R Karagas, Zuo-Feng Zhang, Jack A Taylor, Maurice P A Zeegers, Anke Wesselius, Evan Yi-Wen Yu\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/01635581.2025.2488063\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Evidence regarding the association between tea consumption and bladder cancer (BC) risk is inconsistent. This study aimed to increase our knowledge of the association by using international data from the Bladder Cancer Epidemiology and Nutritional Determinants Consortium.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Individual data on 2,347 cases and 6,871 controls from 15 case-control studies with information on black, green, herbal, or general tea was pooled. The association was estimated using multilevel multivariable logistic regression analysis adjusted for multiple (non-)dietary factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Association between tea consumption and BC risk was observed (odds ratio, OR = 0.72, 95% confidence interval, 95% CI = 0.65-0.80) compared to non-tea drinkers. Stratified analyses based on gender and smoking status yielded similar results. Stratified analysis showed no significant association between black or green tea consumption and BC risk across models, while herbal tea consumption was linked to a reduced BC risk (OR = 0.59, 95% CI = 0.36-0.96). As daily tea consumption increased within a suitable range (<5.67 cups/day), BC risk decreased.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong><i>Camellia sinensis</i> tea showed no association with BC risk, while herbal tea was inversely linked to BC incidence. Despite some significant findings in the selected strata, further studies are required to clarify the underlying mechanisms.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54701,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nutrition and Cancer-An International Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"687-698\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12433241/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nutrition and Cancer-An International Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/01635581.2025.2488063\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/4/8 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NUTRITION & DIETETICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nutrition and Cancer-An International Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01635581.2025.2488063","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:关于饮茶与膀胱癌(BC)风险之间关系的证据是不一致的。本研究旨在通过使用膀胱癌流行病学和营养决定因素联盟的国际数据来增加我们对这种关联的认识。方法:收集了来自15项病例对照研究的2347例病例和6871例对照的个人数据,包括黑茶、绿茶、草药茶或普通茶的信息。使用多水平多变量logistic回归分析对多种(非)饮食因素进行校正,估计其相关性。结果:与不喝茶的人相比,喝茶与BC风险之间存在关联(优势比,OR = 0.72, 95%可信区间,95% CI = 0.65-0.80)。基于性别和吸烟状况的分层分析得出了类似的结果。分层分析显示,在所有模型中,红茶或绿茶的摄入量与BC风险之间没有显著关联,而凉茶的摄入量与BC风险降低有关(or = 0.59, 95% CI = 0.36-0.96)。当每日饮茶量在适当范围内增加时(结论:茶树茶与BC风险无关,而凉茶与BC发病率呈负相关)。尽管在选定的地层中有一些重要的发现,但需要进一步的研究来阐明潜在的机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Association between Tea Consumption and Bladder Cancer Risk Based on the Bladder Cancer Epidemiology and Nutritional Determinants (BLEND) International Consortium.

Objectives: Evidence regarding the association between tea consumption and bladder cancer (BC) risk is inconsistent. This study aimed to increase our knowledge of the association by using international data from the Bladder Cancer Epidemiology and Nutritional Determinants Consortium.

Methods: Individual data on 2,347 cases and 6,871 controls from 15 case-control studies with information on black, green, herbal, or general tea was pooled. The association was estimated using multilevel multivariable logistic regression analysis adjusted for multiple (non-)dietary factors.

Results: Association between tea consumption and BC risk was observed (odds ratio, OR = 0.72, 95% confidence interval, 95% CI = 0.65-0.80) compared to non-tea drinkers. Stratified analyses based on gender and smoking status yielded similar results. Stratified analysis showed no significant association between black or green tea consumption and BC risk across models, while herbal tea consumption was linked to a reduced BC risk (OR = 0.59, 95% CI = 0.36-0.96). As daily tea consumption increased within a suitable range (<5.67 cups/day), BC risk decreased.

Conclusions: Camellia sinensis tea showed no association with BC risk, while herbal tea was inversely linked to BC incidence. Despite some significant findings in the selected strata, further studies are required to clarify the underlying mechanisms.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
3.40%
发文量
172
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: This timely publication reports and reviews current findings on the effects of nutrition on the etiology, therapy, and prevention of cancer. Etiological issues include clinical and experimental research in nutrition, carcinogenesis, epidemiology, biochemistry, and molecular biology. Coverage of therapy focuses on research in clinical nutrition and oncology, dietetics, and bioengineering. Prevention approaches include public health recommendations, preventative medicine, behavior modification, education, functional foods, and agricultural and food production policies.
期刊最新文献
Associations of Whole and Refined Grain Intake with Colorectal Cancer Risk: Dose-Response and Isocaloric Substitution Analyses in a Multi-Center Population-Based Case-Control Study. Residential Fast-Food Exposures, Colorectal Cancer-Specific, and All-Cause Mortality: A Retrospective Study of CRC Cases from the Kentucky Cancer Registry. Interplay Between the Ketogenic Diet and the Gut Microbiome in Glioblastoma: A Comprehensive Review of Mechanisms and Clinical Implications. The Prognostic Nutritional Index Serves as a Novel and Independent Predictor of Recurrence in Patients with Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer. Response to Letter to the Editor, "Association Between Immunotherapy and Overall Survival in Malnourished Patients with Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Nationwide Retrospective Cohort Study in Japan".
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1