提高全髋关节置换术的效率

IF 1 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Journal of Healthcare Quality Research Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-17 DOI:10.1016/j.jhqr.2025.101117
X. Buyse , J.Á. Fernández-Valencia , A. Alías , M. Tió , M. Pablo , A. Serra
{"title":"提高全髋关节置换术的效率","authors":"X. Buyse ,&nbsp;J.Á. Fernández-Valencia ,&nbsp;A. Alías ,&nbsp;M. Tió ,&nbsp;M. Pablo ,&nbsp;A. Serra","doi":"10.1016/j.jhqr.2025.101117","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To evaluate the application of Lean Six Sigma methodology to increase efficiency in a morning total hip arthroplasty program and analyze the challenges in improving operating room efficiency.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A quasi-experimental study with pre-post intervention analysis was conducted in a public university hospital. Multidisciplinary meetings and a retrospective analysis of the previous year were carried out to define improvement points. Study period: June–December 2023, with 24 planned sessions in Monday and Thursday morning modules. Measures implemented included selection of low-complexity cases, early start of surgeries, optimization of changeover times, and use of efficiency-facilitating systems.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The feasibility of performing three procedures in one morning was confirmed, with 72% of cases having surgery times under 90<!--> <!-->min. 67% of the proposed target was achieved, despite the loss of an operating room module for four months. The average start time of the first surgery improved from 9:23<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->54<!--> <!-->min to 8:32<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->22<!--> <!-->min. The average number of procedures per module increased from 1.76 to 2.79. The average changeover time reduced from 29<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->12<!--> <!-->min to 18<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->12<!--> <!-->min.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The Lean Six Sigma methodology has improved operating room efficiency for hip arthroplasty by 50%. Identifying easily modifiable stoppers is crucial for successful implementation of improvements in the clinical process. Additional studies are required to address the challenges identified in post-surgery clinical process and to ensure continuous process optimization.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":37347,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Healthcare Quality Research","volume":"40 5","pages":"Article 101117"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Improving efficiency in a total hip arthroplasty program\",\"authors\":\"X. Buyse ,&nbsp;J.Á. Fernández-Valencia ,&nbsp;A. Alías ,&nbsp;M. Tió ,&nbsp;M. Pablo ,&nbsp;A. Serra\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jhqr.2025.101117\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To evaluate the application of Lean Six Sigma methodology to increase efficiency in a morning total hip arthroplasty program and analyze the challenges in improving operating room efficiency.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A quasi-experimental study with pre-post intervention analysis was conducted in a public university hospital. Multidisciplinary meetings and a retrospective analysis of the previous year were carried out to define improvement points. Study period: June–December 2023, with 24 planned sessions in Monday and Thursday morning modules. Measures implemented included selection of low-complexity cases, early start of surgeries, optimization of changeover times, and use of efficiency-facilitating systems.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The feasibility of performing three procedures in one morning was confirmed, with 72% of cases having surgery times under 90<!--> <!-->min. 67% of the proposed target was achieved, despite the loss of an operating room module for four months. The average start time of the first surgery improved from 9:23<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->54<!--> <!-->min to 8:32<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->22<!--> <!-->min. The average number of procedures per module increased from 1.76 to 2.79. The average changeover time reduced from 29<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->12<!--> <!-->min to 18<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->12<!--> <!-->min.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The Lean Six Sigma methodology has improved operating room efficiency for hip arthroplasty by 50%. Identifying easily modifiable stoppers is crucial for successful implementation of improvements in the clinical process. Additional studies are required to address the challenges identified in post-surgery clinical process and to ensure continuous process optimization.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37347,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Healthcare Quality Research\",\"volume\":\"40 5\",\"pages\":\"Article 101117\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Healthcare Quality Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2603647925000223\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/4/17 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Healthcare Quality Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2603647925000223","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的评价精益六西格玛方法在晨间全髋关节置换术中提高手术效率的应用,并分析提高手术室效率所面临的挑战。方法在某公立大学附属医院进行干预前后分析的准实验研究。进行了多学科会议和对前一年的回顾性分析,以确定改进点。学习时间:2023年6月至12月,周一和周四上午模块计划24次。实施的措施包括选择低复杂性的病例,尽早开始手术,优化转换时间,以及使用提高效率的系统。结果证实了一个上午进行三次手术的可行性,72%的病例手术时间在90分钟以内。尽管失去了四个月的手术室模块,但仍实现了67%的拟议目标。第一次手术平均开始时间由9:23±54 min提高到8:32±22 min,每个模块平均操作数由1.76个增加到2.79个。平均转换时间从29±12分钟减少到18±12分钟。结论精益六西格玛方法使髋关节置换术的手术室效率提高了50%。识别易于修改的止塞器对于成功实施临床过程的改进至关重要。需要进一步的研究来解决术后临床过程中发现的挑战,并确保持续的过程优化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Improving efficiency in a total hip arthroplasty program

Objective

To evaluate the application of Lean Six Sigma methodology to increase efficiency in a morning total hip arthroplasty program and analyze the challenges in improving operating room efficiency.

Methods

A quasi-experimental study with pre-post intervention analysis was conducted in a public university hospital. Multidisciplinary meetings and a retrospective analysis of the previous year were carried out to define improvement points. Study period: June–December 2023, with 24 planned sessions in Monday and Thursday morning modules. Measures implemented included selection of low-complexity cases, early start of surgeries, optimization of changeover times, and use of efficiency-facilitating systems.

Results

The feasibility of performing three procedures in one morning was confirmed, with 72% of cases having surgery times under 90 min. 67% of the proposed target was achieved, despite the loss of an operating room module for four months. The average start time of the first surgery improved from 9:23 ± 54 min to 8:32 ± 22 min. The average number of procedures per module increased from 1.76 to 2.79. The average changeover time reduced from 29 ± 12 min to 18 ± 12 min.

Conclusions

The Lean Six Sigma methodology has improved operating room efficiency for hip arthroplasty by 50%. Identifying easily modifiable stoppers is crucial for successful implementation of improvements in the clinical process. Additional studies are required to address the challenges identified in post-surgery clinical process and to ensure continuous process optimization.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
8.30%
发文量
83
审稿时长
57 days
期刊介绍: Revista de Calidad Asistencial (Quality Healthcare) (RCA) is the official Journal of the Spanish Society of Quality Healthcare (Sociedad Española de Calidad Asistencial) (SECA) and is a tool for the dissemination of knowledge and reflection for the quality management of health services in Primary Care, as well as in Hospitals. It publishes articles associated with any aspect of research in the field of public health and health administration, including health education, epidemiology, medical statistics, health information, health economics, quality management, and health policies. The Journal publishes 6 issues, exclusively in electronic format. The Journal publishes, in Spanish, Original works, Special and Review Articles, as well as other sections. Articles are subjected to a rigorous, double blind, review process (peer review)
期刊最新文献
Simulación in situ: entrenando equipos multidisciplinares en la unidad de cuidados intensivos pediátricos La voz del paciente en podología universitaria: un estudio cualitativo Implementation of ambulatory health care quality standards in an Occupational Mutual Insurance Company Reducción de la estancia hospitalaria tras la puesta en marcha de una vía clínica para pacientes con implantación de marcapasos Building the invisible engine of quality: Using Flanders Quality Model (FlaQuM) to guide patients, clinicians, managers and leadership
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1