不同温度下LPBF和LW-DED打印热处理Inconel 718的拉伸和LCF性能比较

IF 7 2区 材料科学 Q1 ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL International Journal of Fatigue Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-20 DOI:10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2025.109010
Vivek Kumar Singh , Debaraj Sahoo , Anish Ranjan , Murugaiyan Amirthalingam , Shyamprasad Karagadde , Sushil K. Mishra
{"title":"不同温度下LPBF和LW-DED打印热处理Inconel 718的拉伸和LCF性能比较","authors":"Vivek Kumar Singh ,&nbsp;Debaraj Sahoo ,&nbsp;Anish Ranjan ,&nbsp;Murugaiyan Amirthalingam ,&nbsp;Shyamprasad Karagadde ,&nbsp;Sushil K. Mishra","doi":"10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2025.109010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study investigates the effect of processing routes on the tensile and low-cycle fatigue (LCF) performance of Inconel 718 at room temperature (RT) and elevated temperatures fabricated via Laser Powder Bed Fusion (LPBF) and Laser Wire Direct Energy Deposition (LW-DED) under identical heat treatment conditions. Despite the contrasting differences in the solidification microstructures, including dendritic arm spacing, grain size, and the size of secondary phases, the as-printed tensile and LCF behavior of both routes remained comparable. On the contrary, heat-treated LPBF samples exhibited significantly better mechanical properties than LW-DED conditions due to the influence of printing signatures. Among all conditions, LPBF-STA demonstrated the highest tensile strength and LCF performance, surpassing wrought Inconel 718. In contrast, while the LW-DED-STA exhibited good tensile strength and ductility, it demonstrated a significantly poor LCF performance, especially at 650°C. The cyclic softening in the STA samples was due to a combined variation in both back stress and friction stress, attributed to the reduction in the size of γ<em>’’</em>-precipitates. The work reveals the similarity and contrast in the mechanical properties of two processing routes in the as-printed and heat-treated conditions, respectively, and provides insights that are helpful to design Inconel 718 components.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":14112,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Fatigue","volume":"198 ","pages":"Article 109010"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of tensile and LCF behaviour of heat-treated Inconel 718 printed by LPBF and LW-DED at different temperatures\",\"authors\":\"Vivek Kumar Singh ,&nbsp;Debaraj Sahoo ,&nbsp;Anish Ranjan ,&nbsp;Murugaiyan Amirthalingam ,&nbsp;Shyamprasad Karagadde ,&nbsp;Sushil K. Mishra\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2025.109010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This study investigates the effect of processing routes on the tensile and low-cycle fatigue (LCF) performance of Inconel 718 at room temperature (RT) and elevated temperatures fabricated via Laser Powder Bed Fusion (LPBF) and Laser Wire Direct Energy Deposition (LW-DED) under identical heat treatment conditions. Despite the contrasting differences in the solidification microstructures, including dendritic arm spacing, grain size, and the size of secondary phases, the as-printed tensile and LCF behavior of both routes remained comparable. On the contrary, heat-treated LPBF samples exhibited significantly better mechanical properties than LW-DED conditions due to the influence of printing signatures. Among all conditions, LPBF-STA demonstrated the highest tensile strength and LCF performance, surpassing wrought Inconel 718. In contrast, while the LW-DED-STA exhibited good tensile strength and ductility, it demonstrated a significantly poor LCF performance, especially at 650°C. The cyclic softening in the STA samples was due to a combined variation in both back stress and friction stress, attributed to the reduction in the size of γ<em>’’</em>-precipitates. The work reveals the similarity and contrast in the mechanical properties of two processing routes in the as-printed and heat-treated conditions, respectively, and provides insights that are helpful to design Inconel 718 components.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14112,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Fatigue\",\"volume\":\"198 \",\"pages\":\"Article 109010\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Fatigue\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"88\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0142112325002075\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"材料科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/4/20 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Fatigue","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0142112325002075","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究探讨了在相同的热处理条件下,通过激光粉末床熔融(LPBF)和激光线直接能量沉积(LW-DED)制造的Inconel 718在室温(RT)和高温(LCF)条件下的拉伸和低循环疲劳(LCF)性能的加工路线影响。尽管凝固微观结构(包括树枝状臂间距、晶粒大小和次生相的大小)存在差异,但这两种方法的印刷拉伸和低熔点性能仍然相当。相反,由于印刷特征的影响,热处理 LPBF 样品的机械性能明显优于 LW-DED 条件。在所有条件中,LPBF-STA 的拉伸强度和低熔点性能最高,超过了锻造的 Inconel 718。相比之下,虽然 LW-DED-STA 表现出良好的抗拉强度和延展性,但其 LCF 性能明显较差,尤其是在 650°C 时。STA 样品的循环软化是由于背应力和摩擦应力的综合变化造成的,这归因于 γ''-沉淀物尺寸的减小。这项研究揭示了两种加工工艺分别在压印和热处理条件下的机械性能的相似性和对比性,并提供了有助于设计铬镍铁合金 718 部件的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison of tensile and LCF behaviour of heat-treated Inconel 718 printed by LPBF and LW-DED at different temperatures
This study investigates the effect of processing routes on the tensile and low-cycle fatigue (LCF) performance of Inconel 718 at room temperature (RT) and elevated temperatures fabricated via Laser Powder Bed Fusion (LPBF) and Laser Wire Direct Energy Deposition (LW-DED) under identical heat treatment conditions. Despite the contrasting differences in the solidification microstructures, including dendritic arm spacing, grain size, and the size of secondary phases, the as-printed tensile and LCF behavior of both routes remained comparable. On the contrary, heat-treated LPBF samples exhibited significantly better mechanical properties than LW-DED conditions due to the influence of printing signatures. Among all conditions, LPBF-STA demonstrated the highest tensile strength and LCF performance, surpassing wrought Inconel 718. In contrast, while the LW-DED-STA exhibited good tensile strength and ductility, it demonstrated a significantly poor LCF performance, especially at 650°C. The cyclic softening in the STA samples was due to a combined variation in both back stress and friction stress, attributed to the reduction in the size of γ’’-precipitates. The work reveals the similarity and contrast in the mechanical properties of two processing routes in the as-printed and heat-treated conditions, respectively, and provides insights that are helpful to design Inconel 718 components.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Fatigue
International Journal of Fatigue 工程技术-材料科学:综合
CiteScore
10.70
自引率
21.70%
发文量
619
审稿时长
58 days
期刊介绍: Typical subjects discussed in International Journal of Fatigue address: Novel fatigue testing and characterization methods (new kinds of fatigue tests, critical evaluation of existing methods, in situ measurement of fatigue degradation, non-contact field measurements) Multiaxial fatigue and complex loading effects of materials and structures, exploring state-of-the-art concepts in degradation under cyclic loading Fatigue in the very high cycle regime, including failure mode transitions from surface to subsurface, effects of surface treatment, processing, and loading conditions Modeling (including degradation processes and related driving forces, multiscale/multi-resolution methods, computational hierarchical and concurrent methods for coupled component and material responses, novel methods for notch root analysis, fracture mechanics, damage mechanics, crack growth kinetics, life prediction and durability, and prediction of stochastic fatigue behavior reflecting microstructure and service conditions) Models for early stages of fatigue crack formation and growth that explicitly consider microstructure and relevant materials science aspects Understanding the influence or manufacturing and processing route on fatigue degradation, and embedding this understanding in more predictive schemes for mitigation and design against fatigue Prognosis and damage state awareness (including sensors, monitoring, methodology, interactive control, accelerated methods, data interpretation) Applications of technologies associated with fatigue and their implications for structural integrity and reliability. This includes issues related to design, operation and maintenance, i.e., life cycle engineering Smart materials and structures that can sense and mitigate fatigue degradation Fatigue of devices and structures at small scales, including effects of process route and surfaces/interfaces.
期刊最新文献
Synergistic influence of solute segregation and welding thermal cycles on fatigue of ultrathick high-strength low-alloy steel Processing history-controlled fatigue behavior of a NbTaTiHf refractory medium entropy alloy: Decoupling crack initiation and propagation mechanisms The loading-path dependency of fatigue life improvement in SMAT-processed AA7075: From torsion to combined tension–torsion A physics-informed non-destructive method for predicting fatigue life after ultrasonic strengthening Fatigue strength of shot-peened thin welded joints in FB600 advanced high-strength steel: Experimental and numerical investigation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1