{"title":"不同温度下LPBF和LW-DED打印热处理Inconel 718的拉伸和LCF性能比较","authors":"Vivek Kumar Singh , Debaraj Sahoo , Anish Ranjan , Murugaiyan Amirthalingam , Shyamprasad Karagadde , Sushil K. Mishra","doi":"10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2025.109010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study investigates the effect of processing routes on the tensile and low-cycle fatigue (LCF) performance of Inconel 718 at room temperature (RT) and elevated temperatures fabricated via Laser Powder Bed Fusion (LPBF) and Laser Wire Direct Energy Deposition (LW-DED) under identical heat treatment conditions. Despite the contrasting differences in the solidification microstructures, including dendritic arm spacing, grain size, and the size of secondary phases, the as-printed tensile and LCF behavior of both routes remained comparable. On the contrary, heat-treated LPBF samples exhibited significantly better mechanical properties than LW-DED conditions due to the influence of printing signatures. Among all conditions, LPBF-STA demonstrated the highest tensile strength and LCF performance, surpassing wrought Inconel 718. In contrast, while the LW-DED-STA exhibited good tensile strength and ductility, it demonstrated a significantly poor LCF performance, especially at 650°C. The cyclic softening in the STA samples was due to a combined variation in both back stress and friction stress, attributed to the reduction in the size of γ<em>’’</em>-precipitates. The work reveals the similarity and contrast in the mechanical properties of two processing routes in the as-printed and heat-treated conditions, respectively, and provides insights that are helpful to design Inconel 718 components.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":14112,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Fatigue","volume":"198 ","pages":"Article 109010"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of tensile and LCF behaviour of heat-treated Inconel 718 printed by LPBF and LW-DED at different temperatures\",\"authors\":\"Vivek Kumar Singh , Debaraj Sahoo , Anish Ranjan , Murugaiyan Amirthalingam , Shyamprasad Karagadde , Sushil K. Mishra\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2025.109010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This study investigates the effect of processing routes on the tensile and low-cycle fatigue (LCF) performance of Inconel 718 at room temperature (RT) and elevated temperatures fabricated via Laser Powder Bed Fusion (LPBF) and Laser Wire Direct Energy Deposition (LW-DED) under identical heat treatment conditions. Despite the contrasting differences in the solidification microstructures, including dendritic arm spacing, grain size, and the size of secondary phases, the as-printed tensile and LCF behavior of both routes remained comparable. On the contrary, heat-treated LPBF samples exhibited significantly better mechanical properties than LW-DED conditions due to the influence of printing signatures. Among all conditions, LPBF-STA demonstrated the highest tensile strength and LCF performance, surpassing wrought Inconel 718. In contrast, while the LW-DED-STA exhibited good tensile strength and ductility, it demonstrated a significantly poor LCF performance, especially at 650°C. The cyclic softening in the STA samples was due to a combined variation in both back stress and friction stress, attributed to the reduction in the size of γ<em>’’</em>-precipitates. The work reveals the similarity and contrast in the mechanical properties of two processing routes in the as-printed and heat-treated conditions, respectively, and provides insights that are helpful to design Inconel 718 components.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14112,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Fatigue\",\"volume\":\"198 \",\"pages\":\"Article 109010\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Fatigue\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"88\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0142112325002075\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"材料科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/4/20 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Fatigue","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0142112325002075","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparison of tensile and LCF behaviour of heat-treated Inconel 718 printed by LPBF and LW-DED at different temperatures
This study investigates the effect of processing routes on the tensile and low-cycle fatigue (LCF) performance of Inconel 718 at room temperature (RT) and elevated temperatures fabricated via Laser Powder Bed Fusion (LPBF) and Laser Wire Direct Energy Deposition (LW-DED) under identical heat treatment conditions. Despite the contrasting differences in the solidification microstructures, including dendritic arm spacing, grain size, and the size of secondary phases, the as-printed tensile and LCF behavior of both routes remained comparable. On the contrary, heat-treated LPBF samples exhibited significantly better mechanical properties than LW-DED conditions due to the influence of printing signatures. Among all conditions, LPBF-STA demonstrated the highest tensile strength and LCF performance, surpassing wrought Inconel 718. In contrast, while the LW-DED-STA exhibited good tensile strength and ductility, it demonstrated a significantly poor LCF performance, especially at 650°C. The cyclic softening in the STA samples was due to a combined variation in both back stress and friction stress, attributed to the reduction in the size of γ’’-precipitates. The work reveals the similarity and contrast in the mechanical properties of two processing routes in the as-printed and heat-treated conditions, respectively, and provides insights that are helpful to design Inconel 718 components.
期刊介绍:
Typical subjects discussed in International Journal of Fatigue address:
Novel fatigue testing and characterization methods (new kinds of fatigue tests, critical evaluation of existing methods, in situ measurement of fatigue degradation, non-contact field measurements)
Multiaxial fatigue and complex loading effects of materials and structures, exploring state-of-the-art concepts in degradation under cyclic loading
Fatigue in the very high cycle regime, including failure mode transitions from surface to subsurface, effects of surface treatment, processing, and loading conditions
Modeling (including degradation processes and related driving forces, multiscale/multi-resolution methods, computational hierarchical and concurrent methods for coupled component and material responses, novel methods for notch root analysis, fracture mechanics, damage mechanics, crack growth kinetics, life prediction and durability, and prediction of stochastic fatigue behavior reflecting microstructure and service conditions)
Models for early stages of fatigue crack formation and growth that explicitly consider microstructure and relevant materials science aspects
Understanding the influence or manufacturing and processing route on fatigue degradation, and embedding this understanding in more predictive schemes for mitigation and design against fatigue
Prognosis and damage state awareness (including sensors, monitoring, methodology, interactive control, accelerated methods, data interpretation)
Applications of technologies associated with fatigue and their implications for structural integrity and reliability. This includes issues related to design, operation and maintenance, i.e., life cycle engineering
Smart materials and structures that can sense and mitigate fatigue degradation
Fatigue of devices and structures at small scales, including effects of process route and surfaces/interfaces.