{"title":"不锈钢包覆双金属钢CHS T型和k型接头的静强度","authors":"Yi Yang , Fei Gao , Junbo Chen , Tak-Ming Chan","doi":"10.1016/j.engstruct.2025.120405","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper presents an experimental investigation into the structural behaviour and strength of stainless-clad (SC) bimetallic steel circular hollow section (CHS) T- and gapped K-joints. The SCCHS joints consisted of chord and brace members made up of SC bimetallic steel tubes, which were cold-formed from SC bimetallic steel plates with nominal thicknesses of 8 mm, composed of 2 mm 304 L cladding stainless steel and 6 mm Q235 substrate carbon steel. A total of eight SCCHS joints, including four T-joints and four K-joints, were tested. For the T-joints, the axial loading was applied at the brace members, while the axial loading was applied at the chord members for K-joints. In the experimental programme, the brace to chord diameter ratio <em>β</em> ranged from 0.56 to 0.75, the chord diameter to thickness ratio 2<em>γ</em> varied from 25.00 to 33.25, and the gap distance between two braces to chord diameter ratio <em>g</em>/<em>d</em><sub>0</sub> of K-joints changed from 0.139 to 0.408. The load-deformation curves, joint strengths, as well as failure modes of the SCCHS T- and K-joints have been presented. The test results of SCCHS T- and K-joints demonstrated similar failure modes and joint strengths to those of carbon steel joints reported in the literature. Finally, the test results have been used to evaluate the applicability of current design recommendations for normal strength steel joints in ANSI/AISC 360–22, EN 1993–1–8 and API 2A-LRFD to the design of SCCHS T- and K-joints. Results indicate that the ANSI/AISC 360–22, EN 1993–1–8 and API 2A-LRFD characteristic strength equations are conservative for the design of SCCHS T-joints under axial brace load. The ANSI/AISC 360–22 characteristic strength equations tend to underestimate the SCCHS K-joint strengths, while those specified in EN 1993–1–8 and API 2A-LRFD produce marginal predictions to the test joint strengths.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11763,"journal":{"name":"Engineering Structures","volume":"336 ","pages":"Article 120405"},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Static strength of stainless-clad bimetallic steel CHS T- and K-joints\",\"authors\":\"Yi Yang , Fei Gao , Junbo Chen , Tak-Ming Chan\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.engstruct.2025.120405\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This paper presents an experimental investigation into the structural behaviour and strength of stainless-clad (SC) bimetallic steel circular hollow section (CHS) T- and gapped K-joints. The SCCHS joints consisted of chord and brace members made up of SC bimetallic steel tubes, which were cold-formed from SC bimetallic steel plates with nominal thicknesses of 8 mm, composed of 2 mm 304 L cladding stainless steel and 6 mm Q235 substrate carbon steel. A total of eight SCCHS joints, including four T-joints and four K-joints, were tested. For the T-joints, the axial loading was applied at the brace members, while the axial loading was applied at the chord members for K-joints. In the experimental programme, the brace to chord diameter ratio <em>β</em> ranged from 0.56 to 0.75, the chord diameter to thickness ratio 2<em>γ</em> varied from 25.00 to 33.25, and the gap distance between two braces to chord diameter ratio <em>g</em>/<em>d</em><sub>0</sub> of K-joints changed from 0.139 to 0.408. The load-deformation curves, joint strengths, as well as failure modes of the SCCHS T- and K-joints have been presented. The test results of SCCHS T- and K-joints demonstrated similar failure modes and joint strengths to those of carbon steel joints reported in the literature. Finally, the test results have been used to evaluate the applicability of current design recommendations for normal strength steel joints in ANSI/AISC 360–22, EN 1993–1–8 and API 2A-LRFD to the design of SCCHS T- and K-joints. Results indicate that the ANSI/AISC 360–22, EN 1993–1–8 and API 2A-LRFD characteristic strength equations are conservative for the design of SCCHS T-joints under axial brace load. The ANSI/AISC 360–22 characteristic strength equations tend to underestimate the SCCHS K-joint strengths, while those specified in EN 1993–1–8 and API 2A-LRFD produce marginal predictions to the test joint strengths.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11763,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Engineering Structures\",\"volume\":\"336 \",\"pages\":\"Article 120405\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Engineering Structures\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0141029625007965\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/4/26 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CIVIL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Engineering Structures","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0141029625007965","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Static strength of stainless-clad bimetallic steel CHS T- and K-joints
This paper presents an experimental investigation into the structural behaviour and strength of stainless-clad (SC) bimetallic steel circular hollow section (CHS) T- and gapped K-joints. The SCCHS joints consisted of chord and brace members made up of SC bimetallic steel tubes, which were cold-formed from SC bimetallic steel plates with nominal thicknesses of 8 mm, composed of 2 mm 304 L cladding stainless steel and 6 mm Q235 substrate carbon steel. A total of eight SCCHS joints, including four T-joints and four K-joints, were tested. For the T-joints, the axial loading was applied at the brace members, while the axial loading was applied at the chord members for K-joints. In the experimental programme, the brace to chord diameter ratio β ranged from 0.56 to 0.75, the chord diameter to thickness ratio 2γ varied from 25.00 to 33.25, and the gap distance between two braces to chord diameter ratio g/d0 of K-joints changed from 0.139 to 0.408. The load-deformation curves, joint strengths, as well as failure modes of the SCCHS T- and K-joints have been presented. The test results of SCCHS T- and K-joints demonstrated similar failure modes and joint strengths to those of carbon steel joints reported in the literature. Finally, the test results have been used to evaluate the applicability of current design recommendations for normal strength steel joints in ANSI/AISC 360–22, EN 1993–1–8 and API 2A-LRFD to the design of SCCHS T- and K-joints. Results indicate that the ANSI/AISC 360–22, EN 1993–1–8 and API 2A-LRFD characteristic strength equations are conservative for the design of SCCHS T-joints under axial brace load. The ANSI/AISC 360–22 characteristic strength equations tend to underestimate the SCCHS K-joint strengths, while those specified in EN 1993–1–8 and API 2A-LRFD produce marginal predictions to the test joint strengths.
期刊介绍:
Engineering Structures provides a forum for a broad blend of scientific and technical papers to reflect the evolving needs of the structural engineering and structural mechanics communities. Particularly welcome are contributions dealing with applications of structural engineering and mechanics principles in all areas of technology. The journal aspires to a broad and integrated coverage of the effects of dynamic loadings and of the modelling techniques whereby the structural response to these loadings may be computed.
The scope of Engineering Structures encompasses, but is not restricted to, the following areas: infrastructure engineering; earthquake engineering; structure-fluid-soil interaction; wind engineering; fire engineering; blast engineering; structural reliability/stability; life assessment/integrity; structural health monitoring; multi-hazard engineering; structural dynamics; optimization; expert systems; experimental modelling; performance-based design; multiscale analysis; value engineering.
Topics of interest include: tall buildings; innovative structures; environmentally responsive structures; bridges; stadiums; commercial and public buildings; transmission towers; television and telecommunication masts; foldable structures; cooling towers; plates and shells; suspension structures; protective structures; smart structures; nuclear reactors; dams; pressure vessels; pipelines; tunnels.
Engineering Structures also publishes review articles, short communications and discussions, book reviews, and a diary on international events related to any aspect of structural engineering.