一种测量医师糖尿病管理知识的评估工具。

K S Flavin, J R Gavin
{"title":"一种测量医师糖尿病管理知识的评估工具。","authors":"K S Flavin,&nbsp;J R Gavin","doi":"10.1097/00001888-198809000-00002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A 57-item multiple choice test to assess physicians' knowledge of current approaches to diabetes management was devised by a multidisciplinary team that developed the test's case studies and questions. This test was revised based on critiques by diabetologists and other specialists at the Washington University Medical Center and its Diabetes Research and Training Center. A pilot test of the instrument was conducted with 95 residents from five accredited residency training programs and 17 medical students, and the results demonstrated consistent gaps in the respondents' knowledge in several major categories of diabetes management. The test was validated by administering it to 20 endocrinologists with known diabetes expertise and 16 nonspecialist family practice and internal medicine physicians. Analysis of these results revealed significant differences in test performance between the nonspecialists and experts. This initial body of data was used to refine the instrument further to the 56-item test presently being administered nationwide by the diabetes center to groups of family practice and internal medicine physicians and to residents and medical students.</p>","PeriodicalId":31052,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Education","volume":"63 9","pages":"675-81"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1988-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1097/00001888-198809000-00002","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An assessment instrument to measure physicians' knowledge of diabetes management.\",\"authors\":\"K S Flavin,&nbsp;J R Gavin\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/00001888-198809000-00002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>A 57-item multiple choice test to assess physicians' knowledge of current approaches to diabetes management was devised by a multidisciplinary team that developed the test's case studies and questions. This test was revised based on critiques by diabetologists and other specialists at the Washington University Medical Center and its Diabetes Research and Training Center. A pilot test of the instrument was conducted with 95 residents from five accredited residency training programs and 17 medical students, and the results demonstrated consistent gaps in the respondents' knowledge in several major categories of diabetes management. The test was validated by administering it to 20 endocrinologists with known diabetes expertise and 16 nonspecialist family practice and internal medicine physicians. Analysis of these results revealed significant differences in test performance between the nonspecialists and experts. This initial body of data was used to refine the instrument further to the 56-item test presently being administered nationwide by the diabetes center to groups of family practice and internal medicine physicians and to residents and medical students.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":31052,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Medical Education\",\"volume\":\"63 9\",\"pages\":\"675-81\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1988-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1097/00001888-198809000-00002\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Medical Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/00001888-198809000-00002\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/00001888-198809000-00002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

一个多学科团队设计了一项57项的选择题测试,以评估医生对当前糖尿病管理方法的了解。这项测试是根据华盛顿大学医学中心及其糖尿病研究和培训中心的糖尿病学家和其他专家的批评进行修改的。我们对来自5个认可的住院医师培训项目的95名住院医师和17名医科学生进行了该仪器的试点测试,结果显示,受访者在糖尿病管理的几个主要类别的知识方面存在一致的差距。通过对20名已知具有糖尿病专业知识的内分泌学家和16名非专业的家庭医生和内科医生进行测试,验证了该测试的有效性。对这些结果的分析揭示了非专家和专家在测试表现上的显著差异。这一初始数据体被用于进一步完善56项测试工具,目前由糖尿病中心在全国范围内对家庭医生和内科医生以及住院医生和医学生进行测试。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
An assessment instrument to measure physicians' knowledge of diabetes management.

A 57-item multiple choice test to assess physicians' knowledge of current approaches to diabetes management was devised by a multidisciplinary team that developed the test's case studies and questions. This test was revised based on critiques by diabetologists and other specialists at the Washington University Medical Center and its Diabetes Research and Training Center. A pilot test of the instrument was conducted with 95 residents from five accredited residency training programs and 17 medical students, and the results demonstrated consistent gaps in the respondents' knowledge in several major categories of diabetes management. The test was validated by administering it to 20 endocrinologists with known diabetes expertise and 16 nonspecialist family practice and internal medicine physicians. Analysis of these results revealed significant differences in test performance between the nonspecialists and experts. This initial body of data was used to refine the instrument further to the 56-item test presently being administered nationwide by the diabetes center to groups of family practice and internal medicine physicians and to residents and medical students.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
30
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Examining the Status of Competency-Oriented in Medical Science Education in Iran Designing an Application to Empower Academic Staff Members in the Field of E-Learning Design and Development of Electronic Moulage of Brachial Plexus Muscles to Enhance the Learning of Upper Limb Anatomy: An Interventional Study Applying a Meta-synthesis Approach to Present a Blended Learning Model for Talent Development How to Develop a Memory Game for Clinical Courses: A Leading Approach to the Interaction of Education
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1