连续波多普勒超声心动图评价人工主动脉瓣。

Journal of cardiography Pub Date : 1986-03-01
A Kisanuki, C Tei, K Arikawa, Y Otsuji, Y Kawazoe, K Natsugoe, H Tanaka, Y Morishita, A Taira
{"title":"连续波多普勒超声心动图评价人工主动脉瓣。","authors":"A Kisanuki,&nbsp;C Tei,&nbsp;K Arikawa,&nbsp;Y Otsuji,&nbsp;Y Kawazoe,&nbsp;K Natsugoe,&nbsp;H Tanaka,&nbsp;Y Morishita,&nbsp;A Taira","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To assess the prosthetic aortic valve functions according to types and sizes of valves, the peak flow velocity was recorded by means of continuous wave Doppler echocardiography in 40 patients (age 45 +/- 15 years) with prosthetic aortic valves and in 25 normal subjects. Twenty-one patients had Björk-Shiley valves (1-18 months after replacement); 12 had St. Jude Medical valves (6-48 months after replacement); and seven had Carpentier-Edwards porcine xenografts (48-84 months after replacement). The peak blood flow velocity across the prosthetic valve was recorded at the left ventricular apex, the suprasternal notch, and the right parasternal border in the second intercostal space. The pressure gradient was derived from the peak flow velocity by means of the simplified Bernoulli equation (P = 4V2). The peak and mean flow velocities and the peak and mean pressure gradients were measured to evaluate the opening function of the prosthetic valves. The results were as follows; The peak flow velocities were recorded in 33 patients (83%) with aortic valve replacements. All four measurements were significantly greater in patients with prosthetic aortic valves than in normal subjects, but there was no significant difference according to the valve type. The opening function was less in patients with smaller valves than in those with larger ones. There was a clear correlation between opening function and valve size. We concluded that continuous wave Doppler echocardiography is a useful noninvasive method for evaluating the opening function of a prosthetic aortic valve.</p>","PeriodicalId":77734,"journal":{"name":"Journal of cardiography","volume":"16 1","pages":"121-32"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1986-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Continuous wave Doppler echocardiographic assessment of prosthetic aortic valves].\",\"authors\":\"A Kisanuki,&nbsp;C Tei,&nbsp;K Arikawa,&nbsp;Y Otsuji,&nbsp;Y Kawazoe,&nbsp;K Natsugoe,&nbsp;H Tanaka,&nbsp;Y Morishita,&nbsp;A Taira\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>To assess the prosthetic aortic valve functions according to types and sizes of valves, the peak flow velocity was recorded by means of continuous wave Doppler echocardiography in 40 patients (age 45 +/- 15 years) with prosthetic aortic valves and in 25 normal subjects. Twenty-one patients had Björk-Shiley valves (1-18 months after replacement); 12 had St. Jude Medical valves (6-48 months after replacement); and seven had Carpentier-Edwards porcine xenografts (48-84 months after replacement). The peak blood flow velocity across the prosthetic valve was recorded at the left ventricular apex, the suprasternal notch, and the right parasternal border in the second intercostal space. The pressure gradient was derived from the peak flow velocity by means of the simplified Bernoulli equation (P = 4V2). The peak and mean flow velocities and the peak and mean pressure gradients were measured to evaluate the opening function of the prosthetic valves. The results were as follows; The peak flow velocities were recorded in 33 patients (83%) with aortic valve replacements. All four measurements were significantly greater in patients with prosthetic aortic valves than in normal subjects, but there was no significant difference according to the valve type. The opening function was less in patients with smaller valves than in those with larger ones. There was a clear correlation between opening function and valve size. We concluded that continuous wave Doppler echocardiography is a useful noninvasive method for evaluating the opening function of a prosthetic aortic valve.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":77734,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of cardiography\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"121-32\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1986-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of cardiography\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of cardiography","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

采用连续波多普勒超声心动图记录40例(年龄45 +/- 15岁)人工主动脉瓣患者和25例正常人的峰值血流速度,根据瓣膜的类型和大小评价人工主动脉瓣的功能。21例患者置换术后1-18个月植入Björk-Shiley瓣膜;12例有St. Jude Medical瓣膜(置换术后6-48个月);7例移植卡彭迪埃-爱德华兹猪(48-84个月)。在左心室顶点、胸骨上切迹和第二肋间隙右胸骨旁边界处记录了人工瓣膜的血流速度峰值。压力梯度由峰值流速根据简化伯努利方程(P = 4V2)推导。测量峰值流速和平均流速、峰值压力梯度和平均压力梯度,评价人工瓣膜的开启功能。实验结果如下:在33例(83%)主动脉瓣置换术患者中记录了峰值血流速度。人工主动脉瓣患者的四项指标均显著高于正常受试者,但瓣膜类型没有显著差异。瓣膜小的患者的开启功能比瓣膜大的患者差。开启功能与阀门通径有明显的相关性。我们的结论是,连续波多普勒超声心动图是评估人工主动脉瓣开放功能的一种有用的无创方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[Continuous wave Doppler echocardiographic assessment of prosthetic aortic valves].

To assess the prosthetic aortic valve functions according to types and sizes of valves, the peak flow velocity was recorded by means of continuous wave Doppler echocardiography in 40 patients (age 45 +/- 15 years) with prosthetic aortic valves and in 25 normal subjects. Twenty-one patients had Björk-Shiley valves (1-18 months after replacement); 12 had St. Jude Medical valves (6-48 months after replacement); and seven had Carpentier-Edwards porcine xenografts (48-84 months after replacement). The peak blood flow velocity across the prosthetic valve was recorded at the left ventricular apex, the suprasternal notch, and the right parasternal border in the second intercostal space. The pressure gradient was derived from the peak flow velocity by means of the simplified Bernoulli equation (P = 4V2). The peak and mean flow velocities and the peak and mean pressure gradients were measured to evaluate the opening function of the prosthetic valves. The results were as follows; The peak flow velocities were recorded in 33 patients (83%) with aortic valve replacements. All four measurements were significantly greater in patients with prosthetic aortic valves than in normal subjects, but there was no significant difference according to the valve type. The opening function was less in patients with smaller valves than in those with larger ones. There was a clear correlation between opening function and valve size. We concluded that continuous wave Doppler echocardiography is a useful noninvasive method for evaluating the opening function of a prosthetic aortic valve.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
[Mechanical and electrocardiographic sequence of coronary artery occlusion: an echocardiographic study during coronary angioplasty]. [Collateral circulation during exercise-induced angina: evaluation by coronary angiography]. [Echo and Doppler cardiographic findings of isolated quadricuspid aortic valve: a case report and a review of the literature]. [Quantitative integrated backscatter characteristics in the normal and infarcted canine myocardium]. Clinical validity of washout time constant images obtained by digital subtraction angiography.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1