海上天然气管道水合物沉积速率和管壁剪切应力预测的改进计算流体力学模型

IF 4.9 2区 工程技术 Q2 ENERGY & FUELS Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering Pub Date : 2022-11-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jngse.2022.104800
Oghenethoja Monday Umuteme, Sheikh Zahidul Islam, Mamdud Hossain, Aditya Karnik
{"title":"海上天然气管道水合物沉积速率和管壁剪切应力预测的改进计算流体力学模型","authors":"Oghenethoja Monday Umuteme,&nbsp;Sheikh Zahidul Islam,&nbsp;Mamdud Hossain,&nbsp;Aditya Karnik","doi":"10.1016/j.jngse.2022.104800","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Gas hydrates in pipelines is still a flow assurance problem in the oil and gas industry and requires a proactive hydrate plugging risk predicting model. As an active area of research, this work has developed a 3D 10 m length by 0.0204 m diameter horizontal pipe CFD model based on the eulerian-eulerian multiphase modelling framework to predict hydrate deposition rate in gas-dominated pipeline. The proposed model simulates the conditions for hydrate formation with user defined functions (UDFs) for both energy and mass sources implemented in ANSYS Fluent, a commercial CFD software. The empirical hydrate deposition rates predicted by this model at varying subcooling temperatures and gas velocities are consistent with experimental results within ±10% uncertainty bound. At lower gas velocity of 4.7 m/s, the model overpredicted the hydrate deposition rates of the experimental results in Aman et al. (2016) by 9–25.7%, whereas the analytical model of Di Lorenzo et al. (2018) underpredicted the same experimental results by a range of 27–33%. Consequently, the CFD model can enhance proactive hydrate plugging risk predictions earlier than the analytical model, especially at low gas productivity. Similarly, at a velocity of 8.8 m/s and subcooling temperatures of 2.5 K, 7.1 K and 8.0 K, the CFD model underpredicted the hydrate deposition rates of the regressed experimental results in Di Lorenzo et al. (2014a) by 14%, 6% and 4% respectively, and overpredicted the results by 1% at a subcooling temperature of 4.3 K. From the CFD model results, we also suggest that hydrate sloughing shear stress is relatively constant, and the wall shedding shear stress by hydrate vary during deposition. Finally, the CFD model also predicted the phase change during hydrate formation, agglomeration, and deposition.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":372,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An improved computational fluid dynamics (CFD) model for predicting hydrate deposition rate and wall shear stress in offshore gas-dominated pipeline\",\"authors\":\"Oghenethoja Monday Umuteme,&nbsp;Sheikh Zahidul Islam,&nbsp;Mamdud Hossain,&nbsp;Aditya Karnik\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jngse.2022.104800\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Gas hydrates in pipelines is still a flow assurance problem in the oil and gas industry and requires a proactive hydrate plugging risk predicting model. As an active area of research, this work has developed a 3D 10 m length by 0.0204 m diameter horizontal pipe CFD model based on the eulerian-eulerian multiphase modelling framework to predict hydrate deposition rate in gas-dominated pipeline. The proposed model simulates the conditions for hydrate formation with user defined functions (UDFs) for both energy and mass sources implemented in ANSYS Fluent, a commercial CFD software. The empirical hydrate deposition rates predicted by this model at varying subcooling temperatures and gas velocities are consistent with experimental results within ±10% uncertainty bound. At lower gas velocity of 4.7 m/s, the model overpredicted the hydrate deposition rates of the experimental results in Aman et al. (2016) by 9–25.7%, whereas the analytical model of Di Lorenzo et al. (2018) underpredicted the same experimental results by a range of 27–33%. Consequently, the CFD model can enhance proactive hydrate plugging risk predictions earlier than the analytical model, especially at low gas productivity. Similarly, at a velocity of 8.8 m/s and subcooling temperatures of 2.5 K, 7.1 K and 8.0 K, the CFD model underpredicted the hydrate deposition rates of the regressed experimental results in Di Lorenzo et al. (2014a) by 14%, 6% and 4% respectively, and overpredicted the results by 1% at a subcooling temperature of 4.3 K. From the CFD model results, we also suggest that hydrate sloughing shear stress is relatively constant, and the wall shedding shear stress by hydrate vary during deposition. Finally, the CFD model also predicted the phase change during hydrate formation, agglomeration, and deposition.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":372,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1875510022003869\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1875510022003869","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

管道中的天然气水合物仍然是油气行业的流动保障问题,需要一个主动的水合物堵塞风险预测模型。基于欧拉-欧拉多相模型框架,建立了10 m长、直径0.0204 m的水平管道三维CFD模型,用于预测天然气主导管道中水合物沉积速率。该模型利用商用CFD软件ANSYS Fluent中实现的能量和质量源的用户定义函数(udf)来模拟水合物形成的条件。在不同过冷温度和气速下,该模型预测的水合物沉积速率与实验结果在±10%的不确定度范围内是一致的。在较低气速为4.7 m/s时,Aman et al.(2016)实验结果的水合物沉积速率模型高估了9-25.7%,而Di Lorenzo et al.(2018)的分析模型对相同实验结果的低估幅度为27-33%。因此,CFD模型可以比分析模型更早地提高主动水合物堵塞风险预测,特别是在低产气条件下。同样,在速度为8.8 m/s、过冷温度为2.5 K、7.1 K和8.0 K时,CFD模型对Di Lorenzo et al. (2014a)回归实验结果的水合物沉积速率分别低估了14%、6%和4%,对过冷温度为4.3 K时的水合物沉积速率高估了1%。从CFD模型结果也可以看出,水合物的脱落剪切应力是相对恒定的,水合物的壁脱落剪切应力在沉积过程中是不同的。最后,CFD模型还预测了水合物形成、团聚和沉积过程中的相变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
An improved computational fluid dynamics (CFD) model for predicting hydrate deposition rate and wall shear stress in offshore gas-dominated pipeline

Gas hydrates in pipelines is still a flow assurance problem in the oil and gas industry and requires a proactive hydrate plugging risk predicting model. As an active area of research, this work has developed a 3D 10 m length by 0.0204 m diameter horizontal pipe CFD model based on the eulerian-eulerian multiphase modelling framework to predict hydrate deposition rate in gas-dominated pipeline. The proposed model simulates the conditions for hydrate formation with user defined functions (UDFs) for both energy and mass sources implemented in ANSYS Fluent, a commercial CFD software. The empirical hydrate deposition rates predicted by this model at varying subcooling temperatures and gas velocities are consistent with experimental results within ±10% uncertainty bound. At lower gas velocity of 4.7 m/s, the model overpredicted the hydrate deposition rates of the experimental results in Aman et al. (2016) by 9–25.7%, whereas the analytical model of Di Lorenzo et al. (2018) underpredicted the same experimental results by a range of 27–33%. Consequently, the CFD model can enhance proactive hydrate plugging risk predictions earlier than the analytical model, especially at low gas productivity. Similarly, at a velocity of 8.8 m/s and subcooling temperatures of 2.5 K, 7.1 K and 8.0 K, the CFD model underpredicted the hydrate deposition rates of the regressed experimental results in Di Lorenzo et al. (2014a) by 14%, 6% and 4% respectively, and overpredicted the results by 1% at a subcooling temperature of 4.3 K. From the CFD model results, we also suggest that hydrate sloughing shear stress is relatively constant, and the wall shedding shear stress by hydrate vary during deposition. Finally, the CFD model also predicted the phase change during hydrate formation, agglomeration, and deposition.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering
Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering ENERGY & FUELS-ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
388
审稿时长
3.6 months
期刊介绍: The objective of the Journal of Natural Gas Science & Engineering is to bridge the gap between the engineering and the science of natural gas by publishing explicitly written articles intelligible to scientists and engineers working in any field of natural gas science and engineering from the reservoir to the market. An attempt is made in all issues to balance the subject matter and to appeal to a broad readership. The Journal of Natural Gas Science & Engineering covers the fields of natural gas exploration, production, processing and transmission in its broadest possible sense. Topics include: origin and accumulation of natural gas; natural gas geochemistry; gas-reservoir engineering; well logging, testing and evaluation; mathematical modelling; enhanced gas recovery; thermodynamics and phase behaviour, gas-reservoir modelling and simulation; natural gas production engineering; primary and enhanced production from unconventional gas resources, subsurface issues related to coalbed methane, tight gas, shale gas, and hydrate production, formation evaluation; exploration methods, multiphase flow and flow assurance issues, novel processing (e.g., subsea) techniques, raw gas transmission methods, gas processing/LNG technologies, sales gas transmission and storage. The Journal of Natural Gas Science & Engineering will also focus on economical, environmental, management and safety issues related to natural gas production, processing and transportation.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Machine learning for drilling applications: A review Quantitative characterization of methane adsorption in shale using low-field NMR Dual mechanisms of matrix shrinkage affecting permeability evolution and gas production in coal reservoirs: Theoretical analysis and numerical simulation Experimental study on the effect of hydrate reformation on gas permeability of marine sediments
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1