全科医学的临床知识和教育。

H W Acheson, M H Henley
{"title":"全科医学的临床知识和教育。","authors":"H W Acheson,&nbsp;M H Henley","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This project was concerned with the clinical knowledge reported by general practitioners in relation to the diagnosis and management of seven common clinical conditions: acute otitis media, jaundice, iron-deficiency anaemia, transient cerebral vascular insufficiency, infectious mononucleosis, pulmonary infarction, and carcinoma of the prostate. Postal questionnaires were sent to three groups of doctors: a constant group of experienced general practitioners who were or had been trainers, randomly selected groups of 200 general practitioners, and small groups of consultants who were specialists in each condition. The last two groups were changed for each of the chosen clinical conditions; the constant group remained the same throughout. The study was not concerned with the attitudes and skills of general practitioners or consultants, and no attempt has been made to analyse the process of clinical problem-solving. The differences between the constant group and random group of general practitioners were minor. Consultants received questionnaires identical to those sent to general practitioners and were asked to answer them as they would expect a competent general practitioner to do; their answers suggested a more direct approach to the problem concerned than those given by general practitioners. The information obtained has implications for education for general practice and educational audit programmes. Areas for further research are suggested.</p>","PeriodicalId":76682,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners. Occasional paper","volume":" 27","pages":"1-28"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1984-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2573634/pdf/rcgpoccpaper00067-0006.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical knowledge and education for general practice.\",\"authors\":\"H W Acheson,&nbsp;M H Henley\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This project was concerned with the clinical knowledge reported by general practitioners in relation to the diagnosis and management of seven common clinical conditions: acute otitis media, jaundice, iron-deficiency anaemia, transient cerebral vascular insufficiency, infectious mononucleosis, pulmonary infarction, and carcinoma of the prostate. Postal questionnaires were sent to three groups of doctors: a constant group of experienced general practitioners who were or had been trainers, randomly selected groups of 200 general practitioners, and small groups of consultants who were specialists in each condition. The last two groups were changed for each of the chosen clinical conditions; the constant group remained the same throughout. The study was not concerned with the attitudes and skills of general practitioners or consultants, and no attempt has been made to analyse the process of clinical problem-solving. The differences between the constant group and random group of general practitioners were minor. Consultants received questionnaires identical to those sent to general practitioners and were asked to answer them as they would expect a competent general practitioner to do; their answers suggested a more direct approach to the problem concerned than those given by general practitioners. The information obtained has implications for education for general practice and educational audit programmes. Areas for further research are suggested.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":76682,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners. Occasional paper\",\"volume\":\" 27\",\"pages\":\"1-28\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1984-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2573634/pdf/rcgpoccpaper00067-0006.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners. Occasional paper\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners. Occasional paper","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本项目关注全科医生报告的与七种常见临床疾病的诊断和管理相关的临床知识:急性中耳炎、黄疸、缺铁性贫血、一过性脑血管功能不全、传染性单核细胞增多症、肺梗死和前列腺癌。邮寄调查问卷被发送给三组医生:一组是有经验的全科医生,他们是或曾经是培训师,随机选择的200名全科医生,以及每一种情况的专家顾问小组。最后两组根据所选的临床条件进行改变;不变组始终保持不变。该研究与全科医生或咨询师的态度和技能无关,也没有试图分析临床问题解决的过程。常规组和随机组全科医生之间的差异较小。咨询师收到的问卷与发给全科医生的问卷相同,并被要求按照他们对称职的全科医生的期望回答问题;他们的回答比全科医生给出的答案更直接地解决了相关问题。所获得的信息对普通执业教育和教育审计方案有影响。提出了进一步研究的领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Clinical knowledge and education for general practice.

This project was concerned with the clinical knowledge reported by general practitioners in relation to the diagnosis and management of seven common clinical conditions: acute otitis media, jaundice, iron-deficiency anaemia, transient cerebral vascular insufficiency, infectious mononucleosis, pulmonary infarction, and carcinoma of the prostate. Postal questionnaires were sent to three groups of doctors: a constant group of experienced general practitioners who were or had been trainers, randomly selected groups of 200 general practitioners, and small groups of consultants who were specialists in each condition. The last two groups were changed for each of the chosen clinical conditions; the constant group remained the same throughout. The study was not concerned with the attitudes and skills of general practitioners or consultants, and no attempt has been made to analyse the process of clinical problem-solving. The differences between the constant group and random group of general practitioners were minor. Consultants received questionnaires identical to those sent to general practitioners and were asked to answer them as they would expect a competent general practitioner to do; their answers suggested a more direct approach to the problem concerned than those given by general practitioners. The information obtained has implications for education for general practice and educational audit programmes. Areas for further research are suggested.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Practice activity analysis. The contribution of academic general practice to undergraduate medical education. Practice assessment and quality of care. Continuing education for general practitioners. Rating scales for vocational training in general practice 1988. Centre for Primary Care Research, Department of General Practice, University of Manchester.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1