细胞分裂时细胞器的分裂。

C W Birky
{"title":"细胞分裂时细胞器的分裂。","authors":"C W Birky","doi":"10.1016/b978-0-12-364376-6.50009-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>When an organism has only one or two mitochondria or chloroplasts per cell, it is probable that their partitioning is always stringently controlled so that each daughter cell always receives half the organelles in the parent cell. When there are more copies of an organelle, the available data suggest that partitioning is stochastic but far from random, with a strong tendency toward equality. The molecular mechanisms that promote equal partitioning are not known in any case, but the great variety of organelle behavior suggests that many different mechanisms are involved in different organisms. As Wilson (1925) pointed out, the precision of partitioning of cytoplasmic organelles rarely if ever equals that of mitosis, but it is still an expression of selection for mechanisms that will ensure the hereditary continuity of the organelles. How cells compensate for unequal partitioning by controlling organelle replication is known for only one case. But when one considers that Tetrahymena and Paramecium use different methods to compensate for unequal partitioning of macronuclear DNA, it would not be surprising if organisms use a variety of different compensating replication modes for organelles as well. What is surprising is that so little attention has been paid to these problems. Nothing could be simpler than counting organelles in dividing cells, but this has been done on a large scale in only two systems. Quantitative techniques in cell biology have been developed to the point where such studies could be done even on cells that have too many organelles for direct counting. Molecular mechanisms of partitioning have scarcely been touched on. Much more has been done on the role of the cytoskeleton in determining cell shape, and some observations have been made on its role in positioning organelles in interphase cells, but these kinds of studies have not been extended to dividing cells. Some experiments and observations have been made on the role of microtubules and microfilaments in moving cytoplasmic organelles around the cell during interphase, but again nothing has been done on their possible role in partitioning organelles at cytokinesis. The major lesson of this article is how little has been done, and how much can be done. The partitioning of cytoplasmic organelles at cell division is a wide-open field for future research, and one of great importance for both genetics and cell biology.</p>","PeriodicalId":75946,"journal":{"name":"International review of cytology. Supplement","volume":"15 ","pages":"49-89"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1983-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/b978-0-12-364376-6.50009-0","citationCount":"96","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The partitioning of cytoplasmic organelles at cell division.\",\"authors\":\"C W Birky\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/b978-0-12-364376-6.50009-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>When an organism has only one or two mitochondria or chloroplasts per cell, it is probable that their partitioning is always stringently controlled so that each daughter cell always receives half the organelles in the parent cell. When there are more copies of an organelle, the available data suggest that partitioning is stochastic but far from random, with a strong tendency toward equality. The molecular mechanisms that promote equal partitioning are not known in any case, but the great variety of organelle behavior suggests that many different mechanisms are involved in different organisms. As Wilson (1925) pointed out, the precision of partitioning of cytoplasmic organelles rarely if ever equals that of mitosis, but it is still an expression of selection for mechanisms that will ensure the hereditary continuity of the organelles. How cells compensate for unequal partitioning by controlling organelle replication is known for only one case. But when one considers that Tetrahymena and Paramecium use different methods to compensate for unequal partitioning of macronuclear DNA, it would not be surprising if organisms use a variety of different compensating replication modes for organelles as well. What is surprising is that so little attention has been paid to these problems. Nothing could be simpler than counting organelles in dividing cells, but this has been done on a large scale in only two systems. Quantitative techniques in cell biology have been developed to the point where such studies could be done even on cells that have too many organelles for direct counting. Molecular mechanisms of partitioning have scarcely been touched on. Much more has been done on the role of the cytoskeleton in determining cell shape, and some observations have been made on its role in positioning organelles in interphase cells, but these kinds of studies have not been extended to dividing cells. Some experiments and observations have been made on the role of microtubules and microfilaments in moving cytoplasmic organelles around the cell during interphase, but again nothing has been done on their possible role in partitioning organelles at cytokinesis. The major lesson of this article is how little has been done, and how much can be done. The partitioning of cytoplasmic organelles at cell division is a wide-open field for future research, and one of great importance for both genetics and cell biology.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":75946,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International review of cytology. Supplement\",\"volume\":\"15 \",\"pages\":\"49-89\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1983-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/b978-0-12-364376-6.50009-0\",\"citationCount\":\"96\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International review of cytology. Supplement\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-364376-6.50009-0\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International review of cytology. Supplement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-364376-6.50009-0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 96

摘要

当一个生物体的每个细胞只有一个或两个线粒体或叶绿体时,它们的分配很可能总是受到严格控制,因此每个子细胞总是接收亲本细胞中一半的细胞器。当一个细胞器有更多的拷贝时,现有的数据表明,分裂是随机的,但远非随机的,有很强的相等倾向。促进均衡分配的分子机制在任何情况下都不为人所知,但细胞器行为的多样性表明,在不同的生物体中涉及许多不同的机制。正如Wilson(1925)所指出的那样,细胞质细胞器的分配精度很少与有丝分裂的精度相等,但它仍然是选择机制的一种表达,以确保细胞器的遗传连续性。细胞如何通过控制细胞器复制来补偿不均匀分配,目前只知道一种情况。但是当人们考虑到四膜虫和草履虫使用不同的方法来补偿大核DNA的不平等分配时,如果生物体也使用各种不同的补偿细胞器复制模式也就不足为奇了。令人惊讶的是,对这些问题的关注如此之少。没有什么比计数分裂细胞中的细胞器更简单的了,但这只在两个系统中大规模地完成了。细胞生物学中的定量技术已经发展到这样的程度,甚至可以在有太多细胞器而无法直接计数的细胞上进行这样的研究。分子分配机制几乎没有被触及。关于细胞骨架在决定细胞形状中的作用已经做了更多的研究,并对其在间期细胞中定位细胞器的作用进行了一些观察,但这些研究尚未扩展到分裂细胞。关于微管和微丝在细胞间期细胞器移动中的作用已经做了一些实验和观察,但它们在细胞器分裂中可能起的作用仍然没有做任何研究。本文的主要教训是,已经做的很少,而可以做的又有多少。细胞质细胞器在细胞分裂过程中的分裂是未来研究的一个广阔的领域,对遗传学和细胞生物学都具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The partitioning of cytoplasmic organelles at cell division.

When an organism has only one or two mitochondria or chloroplasts per cell, it is probable that their partitioning is always stringently controlled so that each daughter cell always receives half the organelles in the parent cell. When there are more copies of an organelle, the available data suggest that partitioning is stochastic but far from random, with a strong tendency toward equality. The molecular mechanisms that promote equal partitioning are not known in any case, but the great variety of organelle behavior suggests that many different mechanisms are involved in different organisms. As Wilson (1925) pointed out, the precision of partitioning of cytoplasmic organelles rarely if ever equals that of mitosis, but it is still an expression of selection for mechanisms that will ensure the hereditary continuity of the organelles. How cells compensate for unequal partitioning by controlling organelle replication is known for only one case. But when one considers that Tetrahymena and Paramecium use different methods to compensate for unequal partitioning of macronuclear DNA, it would not be surprising if organisms use a variety of different compensating replication modes for organelles as well. What is surprising is that so little attention has been paid to these problems. Nothing could be simpler than counting organelles in dividing cells, but this has been done on a large scale in only two systems. Quantitative techniques in cell biology have been developed to the point where such studies could be done even on cells that have too many organelles for direct counting. Molecular mechanisms of partitioning have scarcely been touched on. Much more has been done on the role of the cytoskeleton in determining cell shape, and some observations have been made on its role in positioning organelles in interphase cells, but these kinds of studies have not been extended to dividing cells. Some experiments and observations have been made on the role of microtubules and microfilaments in moving cytoplasmic organelles around the cell during interphase, but again nothing has been done on their possible role in partitioning organelles at cytokinesis. The major lesson of this article is how little has been done, and how much can be done. The partitioning of cytoplasmic organelles at cell division is a wide-open field for future research, and one of great importance for both genetics and cell biology.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Regulation of genetic activity by thyroid hormones. Viral carcinogenesis. The origin of viruses from cells. Cellular and molecular mechanisms of intracellular symbiosis in leishmaniasis. Symbiotic interactions between Legionella pneumophila and human leukocytes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1