A Markl, G Hasenfratz, B Mayr, U Fink, H Ingrisch, J Lissner
{"title":"[常规影像学、超声和计算机断层扫描在眼内异物术前定位中的比较]。","authors":"A Markl, G Hasenfratz, B Mayr, U Fink, H Ingrisch, J Lissner","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Three methods complementing each other are available for the preoperative intraocular localisation of foreign bodies. Basing on the results obtained, it is recommended, first of all, to localise the site of the foreign body by means of conventional x-ray film, followed by fine diagnosis via ultrasound and, finally, in problematic or doubtful cases, by means of computed tomography.</p>","PeriodicalId":79210,"journal":{"name":"Computertomographie","volume":"3 4","pages":"162-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1983-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Comparison of conventional radiology, ultrasound and computer tomography in the preoperative localization of intraocular foreign bodies].\",\"authors\":\"A Markl, G Hasenfratz, B Mayr, U Fink, H Ingrisch, J Lissner\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Three methods complementing each other are available for the preoperative intraocular localisation of foreign bodies. Basing on the results obtained, it is recommended, first of all, to localise the site of the foreign body by means of conventional x-ray film, followed by fine diagnosis via ultrasound and, finally, in problematic or doubtful cases, by means of computed tomography.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":79210,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Computertomographie\",\"volume\":\"3 4\",\"pages\":\"162-7\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1983-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Computertomographie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computertomographie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
[Comparison of conventional radiology, ultrasound and computer tomography in the preoperative localization of intraocular foreign bodies].
Three methods complementing each other are available for the preoperative intraocular localisation of foreign bodies. Basing on the results obtained, it is recommended, first of all, to localise the site of the foreign body by means of conventional x-ray film, followed by fine diagnosis via ultrasound and, finally, in problematic or doubtful cases, by means of computed tomography.