{"title":"【PSE/ catego系统诊断的可靠性和有效性(作者简介)】。","authors":"T Bronisch, W Schmid, M von Cranach","doi":"10.1007/BF00343297","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>An unselected series of 100 psychiatric inpatient admissions were interviewed at admission by a psychiatrist using the German version of the PSE (Present State Examination), with a second psychiatrist as an observer. The diagnostic agreement between the two project psychiatrists was considerably higher than the agreement between clinicians and CATEGO, a computerised diagnostic system based on PSE data. The disagreements are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":55482,"journal":{"name":"Archiv Fur Psychiatrie Und Nervenkrankheiten","volume":"231 3","pages":"269-81"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1982-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/BF00343297","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Diagnostic reliability and validity of the PSE/CATEGO-system (author's transl)].\",\"authors\":\"T Bronisch, W Schmid, M von Cranach\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/BF00343297\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>An unselected series of 100 psychiatric inpatient admissions were interviewed at admission by a psychiatrist using the German version of the PSE (Present State Examination), with a second psychiatrist as an observer. The diagnostic agreement between the two project psychiatrists was considerably higher than the agreement between clinicians and CATEGO, a computerised diagnostic system based on PSE data. The disagreements are discussed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55482,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archiv Fur Psychiatrie Und Nervenkrankheiten\",\"volume\":\"231 3\",\"pages\":\"269-81\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1982-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/BF00343297\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archiv Fur Psychiatrie Und Nervenkrankheiten\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00343297\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archiv Fur Psychiatrie Und Nervenkrankheiten","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00343297","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
[Diagnostic reliability and validity of the PSE/CATEGO-system (author's transl)].
An unselected series of 100 psychiatric inpatient admissions were interviewed at admission by a psychiatrist using the German version of the PSE (Present State Examination), with a second psychiatrist as an observer. The diagnostic agreement between the two project psychiatrists was considerably higher than the agreement between clinicians and CATEGO, a computerised diagnostic system based on PSE data. The disagreements are discussed.