{"title":"煤储层基质收缩影响渗透率演化和产气的双重机制:理论分析与数值模拟","authors":"Tiantian Zhao , Hao Xu , Dazhen Tang , Peng Zong","doi":"10.1016/j.jngse.2022.104844","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>Matrix shrinkage is a factor that must be considered in the dynamic permeability model of coal reservoirs. The mechanism of matrix shrinkage affecting confining pressure (confining pressure mechanism) has been modeled by analogy with thermal expansion, and it is widely used in permeability model construction. However, the mechanism of matrix shrinkage affecting porosity (porosity mechanism) has not been widely recognized and modeled, and this mechanism independently controls porosity even though neither confining pressure nor </span>pore pressure<span> changes (only the replacement of different adsorbed gases occurs). The porosity mechanism and a permeability model that takes into account the dual mechanism have been modeled recently. This study compares the two mechanisms of matrix shrinkage by theoretical analysis of the mathematic relations in the permeability models considering different mechanisms and by finite element numerical simulations of coalbed methane<span> development considering different mechanisms. Theoretical analysis shows that the effect of the porosity mechanism on permeability is more than 1.5 times that of the confining pressure mechanism. the numerical simulations results show that: considering the porosity mechanism and the confining pressure mechanism simultaneously allows for a larger and earlier improvement in permeability and a larger reservoir area to improve, and a significant improvement of 28% in gas production rate occurs compared with the case only the confining pressure mechanism were considered. This study reveals the importance of porosity mechanism in describing the dynamic evolution of reservoir permeability and production dynamics accurately, and provides a scientific basis for coalbed methane development.</span></span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":372,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering","volume":"108 ","pages":"Article 104844"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dual mechanisms of matrix shrinkage affecting permeability evolution and gas production in coal reservoirs: Theoretical analysis and numerical simulation\",\"authors\":\"Tiantian Zhao , Hao Xu , Dazhen Tang , Peng Zong\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jngse.2022.104844\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p><span>Matrix shrinkage is a factor that must be considered in the dynamic permeability model of coal reservoirs. The mechanism of matrix shrinkage affecting confining pressure (confining pressure mechanism) has been modeled by analogy with thermal expansion, and it is widely used in permeability model construction. However, the mechanism of matrix shrinkage affecting porosity (porosity mechanism) has not been widely recognized and modeled, and this mechanism independently controls porosity even though neither confining pressure nor </span>pore pressure<span> changes (only the replacement of different adsorbed gases occurs). The porosity mechanism and a permeability model that takes into account the dual mechanism have been modeled recently. This study compares the two mechanisms of matrix shrinkage by theoretical analysis of the mathematic relations in the permeability models considering different mechanisms and by finite element numerical simulations of coalbed methane<span> development considering different mechanisms. Theoretical analysis shows that the effect of the porosity mechanism on permeability is more than 1.5 times that of the confining pressure mechanism. the numerical simulations results show that: considering the porosity mechanism and the confining pressure mechanism simultaneously allows for a larger and earlier improvement in permeability and a larger reservoir area to improve, and a significant improvement of 28% in gas production rate occurs compared with the case only the confining pressure mechanism were considered. This study reveals the importance of porosity mechanism in describing the dynamic evolution of reservoir permeability and production dynamics accurately, and provides a scientific basis for coalbed methane development.</span></span></p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":372,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering\",\"volume\":\"108 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104844\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1875510022004309\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1875510022004309","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Dual mechanisms of matrix shrinkage affecting permeability evolution and gas production in coal reservoirs: Theoretical analysis and numerical simulation
Matrix shrinkage is a factor that must be considered in the dynamic permeability model of coal reservoirs. The mechanism of matrix shrinkage affecting confining pressure (confining pressure mechanism) has been modeled by analogy with thermal expansion, and it is widely used in permeability model construction. However, the mechanism of matrix shrinkage affecting porosity (porosity mechanism) has not been widely recognized and modeled, and this mechanism independently controls porosity even though neither confining pressure nor pore pressure changes (only the replacement of different adsorbed gases occurs). The porosity mechanism and a permeability model that takes into account the dual mechanism have been modeled recently. This study compares the two mechanisms of matrix shrinkage by theoretical analysis of the mathematic relations in the permeability models considering different mechanisms and by finite element numerical simulations of coalbed methane development considering different mechanisms. Theoretical analysis shows that the effect of the porosity mechanism on permeability is more than 1.5 times that of the confining pressure mechanism. the numerical simulations results show that: considering the porosity mechanism and the confining pressure mechanism simultaneously allows for a larger and earlier improvement in permeability and a larger reservoir area to improve, and a significant improvement of 28% in gas production rate occurs compared with the case only the confining pressure mechanism were considered. This study reveals the importance of porosity mechanism in describing the dynamic evolution of reservoir permeability and production dynamics accurately, and provides a scientific basis for coalbed methane development.
期刊介绍:
The objective of the Journal of Natural Gas Science & Engineering is to bridge the gap between the engineering and the science of natural gas by publishing explicitly written articles intelligible to scientists and engineers working in any field of natural gas science and engineering from the reservoir to the market.
An attempt is made in all issues to balance the subject matter and to appeal to a broad readership. The Journal of Natural Gas Science & Engineering covers the fields of natural gas exploration, production, processing and transmission in its broadest possible sense. Topics include: origin and accumulation of natural gas; natural gas geochemistry; gas-reservoir engineering; well logging, testing and evaluation; mathematical modelling; enhanced gas recovery; thermodynamics and phase behaviour, gas-reservoir modelling and simulation; natural gas production engineering; primary and enhanced production from unconventional gas resources, subsurface issues related to coalbed methane, tight gas, shale gas, and hydrate production, formation evaluation; exploration methods, multiphase flow and flow assurance issues, novel processing (e.g., subsea) techniques, raw gas transmission methods, gas processing/LNG technologies, sales gas transmission and storage. The Journal of Natural Gas Science & Engineering will also focus on economical, environmental, management and safety issues related to natural gas production, processing and transportation.