大鼠微血管吻合口强度的实验评价。

C B Davis, B M Smith, P O Hagen, J R Urbaniak
{"title":"大鼠微血管吻合口强度的实验评价。","authors":"C B Davis,&nbsp;B M Smith,&nbsp;P O Hagen,&nbsp;J R Urbaniak","doi":"10.1002/micr.1920030306","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To determine the longitudinal strength of microvascular anastomoses during early healing, the left femoral arteries of 56 rats were divided and anastomosed with six interrupted sutures of 10-0 nylon. The right femoral arteries served as unoperated controls. The vessels were then harvested immediately, or 3, 7, 14, 21, 28, or 120-150 days after surgery. The cross-sectional surface area was measured and the force required to pull the vessels apart (burst strength) was determined with a tensiometer. Fifty-four of the 56 anastomosed vessels were patent at the time of harvest. All of the operated vessels ruptured at the site of anastomosis when the sutures pulled through the vessel wall. The mean burst strength of the anastomosed vessels was 44% of the contralateral unoperated controls immediately after surgery and did not significantly increase for four to five months. It was concluded that early mobilization of replanted parts is not limited by the strength of microarterial anastomoses.</p>","PeriodicalId":79226,"journal":{"name":"Journal of microsurgery","volume":"3 3","pages":"156-61"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1982-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/micr.1920030306","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The strength of microvascular anastomoses--an experimental evaluation in rats.\",\"authors\":\"C B Davis,&nbsp;B M Smith,&nbsp;P O Hagen,&nbsp;J R Urbaniak\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/micr.1920030306\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>To determine the longitudinal strength of microvascular anastomoses during early healing, the left femoral arteries of 56 rats were divided and anastomosed with six interrupted sutures of 10-0 nylon. The right femoral arteries served as unoperated controls. The vessels were then harvested immediately, or 3, 7, 14, 21, 28, or 120-150 days after surgery. The cross-sectional surface area was measured and the force required to pull the vessels apart (burst strength) was determined with a tensiometer. Fifty-four of the 56 anastomosed vessels were patent at the time of harvest. All of the operated vessels ruptured at the site of anastomosis when the sutures pulled through the vessel wall. The mean burst strength of the anastomosed vessels was 44% of the contralateral unoperated controls immediately after surgery and did not significantly increase for four to five months. It was concluded that early mobilization of replanted parts is not limited by the strength of microarterial anastomoses.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":79226,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of microsurgery\",\"volume\":\"3 3\",\"pages\":\"156-61\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1982-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/micr.1920030306\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of microsurgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/micr.1920030306\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of microsurgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/micr.1920030306","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

为测定愈合早期微血管吻合口的纵向强度,采用6条10-0尼龙间断缝合线对56只大鼠左股动脉进行分离吻合。右股动脉作为未手术对照。手术后立即或3、7、14、21、28或120-150天切除血管。测量了横截面表面积,并用张力计确定了将血管拉开所需的力(破裂强度)。56条吻合血管中有54条在收获时是通畅的。所有手术血管均在吻合处破裂,当缝合线穿过血管壁时。术后吻合血管的平均破裂强度为对侧未手术对照的44%,4 ~ 5个月无明显增加。结论:移植部位的早期活动不受微动脉吻合口强度的限制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The strength of microvascular anastomoses--an experimental evaluation in rats.

To determine the longitudinal strength of microvascular anastomoses during early healing, the left femoral arteries of 56 rats were divided and anastomosed with six interrupted sutures of 10-0 nylon. The right femoral arteries served as unoperated controls. The vessels were then harvested immediately, or 3, 7, 14, 21, 28, or 120-150 days after surgery. The cross-sectional surface area was measured and the force required to pull the vessels apart (burst strength) was determined with a tensiometer. Fifty-four of the 56 anastomosed vessels were patent at the time of harvest. All of the operated vessels ruptured at the site of anastomosis when the sutures pulled through the vessel wall. The mean burst strength of the anastomosed vessels was 44% of the contralateral unoperated controls immediately after surgery and did not significantly increase for four to five months. It was concluded that early mobilization of replanted parts is not limited by the strength of microarterial anastomoses.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Clinical and experimental microsurgery in China: an historical note. Quantitative analysis of plasminogen activator in small arteries by modified fibrin plates. Efforts to enhance survival of limb allografts by prior administration of whole blood in rats using a new survival end-point. Experimental carotid artery aneurysms in rats: a new model for microsurgical practice. Stenosis following end-in-end microarterial anastomosis: an angiographic comparison with the end-to-end technique.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1