[结合两种筛查方法对献血者和血浆者进行艾滋病毒筛查的模型计算:检测策略、效度、成本和效果]。

U Abel, S T Kiessig
{"title":"[结合两种筛查方法对献血者和血浆者进行艾滋病毒筛查的模型计算:检测策略、效度、成本和效果]。","authors":"U Abel,&nbsp;S T Kiessig","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The strategies for combining two screening tests for HIV infections in blood or plasma donors are formulated in biometric terms and analyzed with respect to their value, i.e. their validity, cost and effectiveness.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Biometrical modeling using assumptions on the validity of the single tests, the conditional correlations between them, as well as on the cost of testing and the consequences of false-negative or false-positive test results.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>If the test combination is defined as positive whenever at least one of the single tests is positive, then this rule (the 'believe the positive' rule, BTP), due to its lower specificity, has extremely low positive predictive values. In case of high prevalence rates of the infection (e.g. 1:1,000), the BTP rule leads to lower total cost than single testing, unless the latter has very high sensitivity (e.g. 99%). For smaller prevalence rates (< 1:50,000), which are more typical of the selected group of blood or plasma donors, combination testing is of little value because the extra cost of detecting one additional infection (compared with single testing) may reach several 100 million DM.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The cost for detecting additional cases of HIV infection by using combination instead of single testing in HIV screening is so high that this decision requires a public consensus.</p>","PeriodicalId":13632,"journal":{"name":"Infusionstherapie und Transfusionsmedizin","volume":"22 3","pages":"175-85"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1995-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Model calculations for HIV screening of blood and plasma donors with a combination of 2 screening tests: test strategies, validity, costs and effectiveness].\",\"authors\":\"U Abel,&nbsp;S T Kiessig\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The strategies for combining two screening tests for HIV infections in blood or plasma donors are formulated in biometric terms and analyzed with respect to their value, i.e. their validity, cost and effectiveness.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Biometrical modeling using assumptions on the validity of the single tests, the conditional correlations between them, as well as on the cost of testing and the consequences of false-negative or false-positive test results.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>If the test combination is defined as positive whenever at least one of the single tests is positive, then this rule (the 'believe the positive' rule, BTP), due to its lower specificity, has extremely low positive predictive values. In case of high prevalence rates of the infection (e.g. 1:1,000), the BTP rule leads to lower total cost than single testing, unless the latter has very high sensitivity (e.g. 99%). For smaller prevalence rates (< 1:50,000), which are more typical of the selected group of blood or plasma donors, combination testing is of little value because the extra cost of detecting one additional infection (compared with single testing) may reach several 100 million DM.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The cost for detecting additional cases of HIV infection by using combination instead of single testing in HIV screening is so high that this decision requires a public consensus.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13632,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Infusionstherapie und Transfusionsmedizin\",\"volume\":\"22 3\",\"pages\":\"175-85\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1995-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Infusionstherapie und Transfusionsmedizin\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infusionstherapie und Transfusionsmedizin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:结合两种血液或血浆献血者艾滋病毒感染筛查试验的策略,以生物计量学术语制定,并分析其价值,即其有效性、成本和有效性。设计:利用对单次测试的有效性、它们之间的条件相关性、测试成本和假阴性或假阳性测试结果的后果的假设进行生物计量建模。结果:如果当至少一项单项检测阳性时,该检测组合被定义为阳性,则该规则(“相信阳性”规则,BTP)由于其较低的特异性,具有极低的阳性预测值。在感染流行率较高的情况下(例如1:10 000),BTP规则比单一检测的总成本更低,除非后者具有非常高的灵敏度(例如99%)。对于更小的流行率(< 1:50 000),这是更典型的选定的血液或血浆献血者群体,联合检测几乎没有价值,因为检测一个额外的感染(与单一检测相比)的额外成本可能达到数亿dm。结论:在艾滋病毒筛查中使用联合检测而不是单一检测来检测额外的艾滋病毒感染病例的成本非常高,因此这一决定需要公众共识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[Model calculations for HIV screening of blood and plasma donors with a combination of 2 screening tests: test strategies, validity, costs and effectiveness].

Objective: The strategies for combining two screening tests for HIV infections in blood or plasma donors are formulated in biometric terms and analyzed with respect to their value, i.e. their validity, cost and effectiveness.

Design: Biometrical modeling using assumptions on the validity of the single tests, the conditional correlations between them, as well as on the cost of testing and the consequences of false-negative or false-positive test results.

Results: If the test combination is defined as positive whenever at least one of the single tests is positive, then this rule (the 'believe the positive' rule, BTP), due to its lower specificity, has extremely low positive predictive values. In case of high prevalence rates of the infection (e.g. 1:1,000), the BTP rule leads to lower total cost than single testing, unless the latter has very high sensitivity (e.g. 99%). For smaller prevalence rates (< 1:50,000), which are more typical of the selected group of blood or plasma donors, combination testing is of little value because the extra cost of detecting one additional infection (compared with single testing) may reach several 100 million DM.

Conclusion: The cost for detecting additional cases of HIV infection by using combination instead of single testing in HIV screening is so high that this decision requires a public consensus.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Platelet Concentrates from Automated Apheresis - Past, Present and Future Developments. Arificial Oxygen Carriers as Red Blood Cell Substitutes - Perfluorocarbons and Cell-Free Hemoglobin. Transfusion-Associated Infections with Cytomegalovirus and Other Human Herpesviruses. Comparison of Solvent/Detergent-Inactivated Plasma and Fresh Frozen Plasma under Routine Clinical Conditions. Coexisting Anti-I/i Plus Anti Pr Cold Agglutinins in Individual Sera.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1