对比澳大利亚人、日本人和巴布亚新几内亚人与其他5个人群的79种DNA多态性。

A A Lin, J M Hebert, J L Mountain, L L Cavalli-Sforza
{"title":"对比澳大利亚人、日本人和巴布亚新几内亚人与其他5个人群的79种DNA多态性。","authors":"A A Lin,&nbsp;J M Hebert,&nbsp;J L Mountain,&nbsp;L L Cavalli-Sforza","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Seventy-nine DNA polymorphisms from 57 loci (28 genes and 29 anonymous DNA segments) have been typed in eight human populations. Here we present allele frequencies for three populations (Japanese, New Guineans, and Australians) as well as revised frequencies for a Chinese sample: allele frequencies for five additional populations (Biaka and Mbuti Pygmies, Melanesians, Chinese, and Europeans) were described previously [Bowcock et al 1991a]. Evaluation of Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium for these polymorphisms suggested that the New Guinean sample may be from a highly substructured population. Average FST value for the 79 markers (polymorphisms) was 0.147 +/- 0.011 across the eight populations: Fst values for some markers changed dramatically with the addition of three populations--in particular, Australians and New Guineans. Average heterozygosity for eight populations was 0.307 +/- 0.014. Genetic distances indicated that the Australian sample may have some European ancestry. An average linkage tree inferred from these distances suggested that the first split of modern humans was between Africans and non-Africans, while the second major split was between Australians/New Guineans and all other non-Africans. The neighbor-joining tree also separated the African populations from all others. European polymorphism ascertainment bias and European admixture appear to have influenced both estimation of population heterozygosity and tree inference.</p>","PeriodicalId":77141,"journal":{"name":"Gene geography : a computerized bulletin on human gene frequencies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1994-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of 79 DNA polymorphisms tested in Australians, Japanese and Papua New Guineans with those of five other human populations.\",\"authors\":\"A A Lin,&nbsp;J M Hebert,&nbsp;J L Mountain,&nbsp;L L Cavalli-Sforza\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Seventy-nine DNA polymorphisms from 57 loci (28 genes and 29 anonymous DNA segments) have been typed in eight human populations. Here we present allele frequencies for three populations (Japanese, New Guineans, and Australians) as well as revised frequencies for a Chinese sample: allele frequencies for five additional populations (Biaka and Mbuti Pygmies, Melanesians, Chinese, and Europeans) were described previously [Bowcock et al 1991a]. Evaluation of Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium for these polymorphisms suggested that the New Guinean sample may be from a highly substructured population. Average FST value for the 79 markers (polymorphisms) was 0.147 +/- 0.011 across the eight populations: Fst values for some markers changed dramatically with the addition of three populations--in particular, Australians and New Guineans. Average heterozygosity for eight populations was 0.307 +/- 0.014. Genetic distances indicated that the Australian sample may have some European ancestry. An average linkage tree inferred from these distances suggested that the first split of modern humans was between Africans and non-Africans, while the second major split was between Australians/New Guineans and all other non-Africans. The neighbor-joining tree also separated the African populations from all others. European polymorphism ascertainment bias and European admixture appear to have influenced both estimation of population heterozygosity and tree inference.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":77141,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gene geography : a computerized bulletin on human gene frequencies\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1994-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gene geography : a computerized bulletin on human gene frequencies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gene geography : a computerized bulletin on human gene frequencies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在8个人群中发现了来自57个位点(28个基因和29个匿名DNA片段)的79个DNA多态性。在这里,我们展示了三个人群(日本人、新几内亚人和澳大利亚人)的等位基因频率,以及一个中国样本的修正频率:另外五个人群(比阿卡和姆布提俾格米人、美拉尼西亚人、中国人和欧洲人)的等位基因频率在之前已经描述过[Bowcock et al . 1991a]。对这些多态性的Hardy-Weinberg平衡的评估表明,新几内亚样本可能来自一个高度亚结构的种群。在8个种群中,79个标记(多态性)的平均FST值为0.147 +/- 0.011;随着3个种群的增加,一些标记的FST值发生了巨大变化,特别是澳大利亚人和新几内亚人。8个群体的平均杂合度为0.307±0.014。遗传距离表明,澳大利亚样本可能有一些欧洲血统。从这些距离推断出的平均联系树表明,现代人的第一次分裂发生在非洲人和非非洲人之间,而第二次主要分裂发生在澳大利亚人/新几内亚人和所有其他非非洲人之间。邻居连接树也将非洲人与其他人种区分开来。欧洲多态性确定偏差和欧洲混合似乎对群体杂合度估计和树推断都有影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison of 79 DNA polymorphisms tested in Australians, Japanese and Papua New Guineans with those of five other human populations.

Seventy-nine DNA polymorphisms from 57 loci (28 genes and 29 anonymous DNA segments) have been typed in eight human populations. Here we present allele frequencies for three populations (Japanese, New Guineans, and Australians) as well as revised frequencies for a Chinese sample: allele frequencies for five additional populations (Biaka and Mbuti Pygmies, Melanesians, Chinese, and Europeans) were described previously [Bowcock et al 1991a]. Evaluation of Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium for these polymorphisms suggested that the New Guinean sample may be from a highly substructured population. Average FST value for the 79 markers (polymorphisms) was 0.147 +/- 0.011 across the eight populations: Fst values for some markers changed dramatically with the addition of three populations--in particular, Australians and New Guineans. Average heterozygosity for eight populations was 0.307 +/- 0.014. Genetic distances indicated that the Australian sample may have some European ancestry. An average linkage tree inferred from these distances suggested that the first split of modern humans was between Africans and non-Africans, while the second major split was between Australians/New Guineans and all other non-Africans. The neighbor-joining tree also separated the African populations from all others. European polymorphism ascertainment bias and European admixture appear to have influenced both estimation of population heterozygosity and tree inference.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Abbreviations Spectrum Sharing Index CONCLUSION Tables and Figures
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1