[口服抗生素的多中心评价:瑞士5个中心的耐药行为]。

W Cullmann, R Auckenthaler, J Bille, I Heinzer, J C Piffaretti, J Wüst
{"title":"[口服抗生素的多中心评价:瑞士5个中心的耐药行为]。","authors":"W Cullmann,&nbsp;R Auckenthaler,&nbsp;J Bille,&nbsp;I Heinzer,&nbsp;J C Piffaretti,&nbsp;J Wüst","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The susceptibility of 2196 fresh clinical isolates to twelve different oral compounds was assessed in five Swiss microbiology institutions during summer 1992. A standardized microdilution system including all other material necessary was employed to assess the antibacterial activity of penicillin G, ampicillin, ampicillin + sulbactam, amoxycillin + clavulanic acid, cefadroxil, cephalexin, cefaclor, cefuroxime, cefetamet, doxycycline, erythromycin and clindamycin. The aminopenicillins (including the beta-lactamase inhibitor combinations) were highly active against the streptococci, in combination with a beta-lactamase inhibitor they covered the majority of the bla+ E. coli and Proteus mirabilis and between 60 to 80% of the Klebsiella spp. and Proteus vulgaris isolates. All the cephalosporins exhibited good activity against the streptococci, they were active against Gram-negative fermentative rods to a varying degree. Cefetamet was also active against many cefaclor and cefuroxime-resistant isolates. A considerable part of the species studied exhibited resistance to doxycycline; the observed resistance of S. agalactia, P. mirabilis, and Morganella morganii agreed with previous findings. Most of the Streptococcus spp. were inhibited by erythromycin and clindamycin. There were only single penicillin resistant S. pneumoniae isolates in the five Swiss centers. Taking account of the above particulars the epidemiology of antimicrobial resistance in Switzerland can be considered satisfactory.</p>","PeriodicalId":21438,"journal":{"name":"Schweizerische Rundschau fur Medizin Praxis = Revue suisse de medecine Praxis","volume":"83 35","pages":"980-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1994-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Multicenter evaluation of oral antibiotics: resistance behavior in 5 Swiss centers].\",\"authors\":\"W Cullmann,&nbsp;R Auckenthaler,&nbsp;J Bille,&nbsp;I Heinzer,&nbsp;J C Piffaretti,&nbsp;J Wüst\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The susceptibility of 2196 fresh clinical isolates to twelve different oral compounds was assessed in five Swiss microbiology institutions during summer 1992. A standardized microdilution system including all other material necessary was employed to assess the antibacterial activity of penicillin G, ampicillin, ampicillin + sulbactam, amoxycillin + clavulanic acid, cefadroxil, cephalexin, cefaclor, cefuroxime, cefetamet, doxycycline, erythromycin and clindamycin. The aminopenicillins (including the beta-lactamase inhibitor combinations) were highly active against the streptococci, in combination with a beta-lactamase inhibitor they covered the majority of the bla+ E. coli and Proteus mirabilis and between 60 to 80% of the Klebsiella spp. and Proteus vulgaris isolates. All the cephalosporins exhibited good activity against the streptococci, they were active against Gram-negative fermentative rods to a varying degree. Cefetamet was also active against many cefaclor and cefuroxime-resistant isolates. A considerable part of the species studied exhibited resistance to doxycycline; the observed resistance of S. agalactia, P. mirabilis, and Morganella morganii agreed with previous findings. Most of the Streptococcus spp. were inhibited by erythromycin and clindamycin. There were only single penicillin resistant S. pneumoniae isolates in the five Swiss centers. Taking account of the above particulars the epidemiology of antimicrobial resistance in Switzerland can be considered satisfactory.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21438,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Schweizerische Rundschau fur Medizin Praxis = Revue suisse de medecine Praxis\",\"volume\":\"83 35\",\"pages\":\"980-6\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1994-08-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Schweizerische Rundschau fur Medizin Praxis = Revue suisse de medecine Praxis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Schweizerische Rundschau fur Medizin Praxis = Revue suisse de medecine Praxis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

1992年夏季,在瑞士5个微生物机构对2196个新鲜临床分离株对12种不同口服化合物的敏感性进行了评估。采用标准化的微量稀释系统,包括所有必要的其他材料,评估青霉素G、氨苄西林、氨苄西林+舒巴坦、阿莫西林+克拉维酸、头孢羟肟、头孢氨苄、头孢克洛、头孢呋辛、头孢他美、强力霉素、红霉素和克林霉素的抗菌活性。氨霉素(包括β -内酰胺酶抑制剂组合)对链球菌具有高度活性,与β -内酰胺酶抑制剂组合时,它们覆盖了大多数bla+大肠杆菌和奇异变形杆菌,以及60%至80%的克雷伯氏菌和普通变形杆菌分离株。所有头孢菌素均表现出良好的抗链球菌活性,对革兰氏阴性发酵棒均有不同程度的活性。头孢他胺对许多头孢克洛和头孢呋辛耐药菌株也有活性。相当一部分被研究的物种表现出对强力霉素的抗性;观察到的无乳链球菌、神奇链球菌和摩根氏菌的耐药性与先前的发现一致。红霉素和克林霉素对大部分链球菌均有抑制作用。在瑞士的5个中心中只有单一的青霉素耐药肺炎链球菌分离株。考虑到上述细节,瑞士抗菌素耐药性的流行病学可以被认为是令人满意的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[Multicenter evaluation of oral antibiotics: resistance behavior in 5 Swiss centers].

The susceptibility of 2196 fresh clinical isolates to twelve different oral compounds was assessed in five Swiss microbiology institutions during summer 1992. A standardized microdilution system including all other material necessary was employed to assess the antibacterial activity of penicillin G, ampicillin, ampicillin + sulbactam, amoxycillin + clavulanic acid, cefadroxil, cephalexin, cefaclor, cefuroxime, cefetamet, doxycycline, erythromycin and clindamycin. The aminopenicillins (including the beta-lactamase inhibitor combinations) were highly active against the streptococci, in combination with a beta-lactamase inhibitor they covered the majority of the bla+ E. coli and Proteus mirabilis and between 60 to 80% of the Klebsiella spp. and Proteus vulgaris isolates. All the cephalosporins exhibited good activity against the streptococci, they were active against Gram-negative fermentative rods to a varying degree. Cefetamet was also active against many cefaclor and cefuroxime-resistant isolates. A considerable part of the species studied exhibited resistance to doxycycline; the observed resistance of S. agalactia, P. mirabilis, and Morganella morganii agreed with previous findings. Most of the Streptococcus spp. were inhibited by erythromycin and clindamycin. There were only single penicillin resistant S. pneumoniae isolates in the five Swiss centers. Taking account of the above particulars the epidemiology of antimicrobial resistance in Switzerland can be considered satisfactory.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
[Interventional cardiology]. [Pallor]. [Leukopenia]. [In Process Citation] [What is your diagnosis? Henoch-Schoenlein rheumatoid purpura].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1